posted
I've read some threads that addressed this topic to some degree, but I thought it would be useful to get concrete input from some of the guys who have shot them both. I'm currently saving for what will likely be one of the two of these brands as I feel the need to get another D-bow after giving up my Hill Tembo this spring.
I've shot Hills but never a Bama. So how much of a difference is there? I'm concerned mostly about smoothness and silence. Is there really $125 worth of difference in smoothness and silence when going with an Ekin hill vs. Steele's Bama? I've heard great things about the Bama's, but again how do they compare directly with the hills that I have shot so much of?
-------------------- I Corinthians 9 24-25 ...run in such a way so as to obtain the prize! Posts: 1196 | From: Stewartstown, Pa | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ill go ahead and be the first knuckle head to say Ive never shot a Hill bow but I do own a Bama and the design and shaping of the handle and arrow shelf are much more ergonomic compared to what Ive seen of Hill bows. The grip is perfect and the arrow shelf is much more recessed and radiused than a Hill. As I said Ive never shot an actual Hill bow but I do own Hill style bows and the Bama shoots a lot straighter and much more consistently, which I attribute to the more comfortable grip and, for lack of a better word, buttery arrow shelf.
Posts: 225 | From: Pennsylvania | Registered: Mar 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
I've shot and owned both. My first Semi-Longbow was an Ekin Hill "Sirocco" limited edition. This bow is absolutely gorgeous. Unfortunately, when I first bought it I couldn't even pull it.
So I decided to hold onto the Hill and order a lightweight BamaBow. Nate has a great reputation and makes a gorgeous looking and serious shooting longbow. I had an Elite Classic T/D and it was excellent. Shot great, very quiet, no thumping (with B-50). Fit and finish was very high quality. I only sold it because I went up in weight. Now that "Sirocco" is right in my wheelhouse and shoots with authority. Glad I didn't sell it. I've also shot Miller Longbows and Pete George "Timberline" Longbows.
Bottom line I don't think you can go wrong with either. I would own another BamaBow if it was a true "Hill-style" American Semi-Longbow. I just like the old style better. But Nate's design is certainly comfortable and shoots great. If $$ is an issue go to Nate with confidence. If it isn't and you really want a Howard Hill Archery longbow, then go for it.
-------------------- "...and last of all I leave to you thrill of life and the joy of youth that throbs a moment in a well bent bow, then leaps forth in the flight of an arrow." - Saxton Pope Posts: 690 | From: Tabernacle, NJ | Registered: Feb 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
Bama isn't considered a true hill style? Is this because of the larger riser?
-------------------- I Corinthians 9 24-25 ...run in such a way so as to obtain the prize! Posts: 1196 | From: Stewartstown, Pa | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
The limbs are a little wider, locator grip, and more center shot than the Hill style.
Posts: 335 | From: Bartlesville OK | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- I Corinthians 9 24-25 ...run in such a way so as to obtain the prize! Posts: 1196 | From: Stewartstown, Pa | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have many HIll Bows and one Bama bow. The Hill bows are more of the classics straight limb or string follow bow, classic american longbow. The Bama is considered a Hybrid longbow, being a reflex/deflex bow. Both bows after tuning, and matching arrows are great shooting bows. I just prefer the Hill style over any hybrid, but that is becasue I shoot more of the Hill method than just a straight arm longbow style, but if just starting and getting into tradtional a Bama is a good bow. By the way shot two deer with my bama this year to get it bloody.
Posts: 1010 | From: Decatur, illinois | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Never shot a Hill style bow. But my Bama was soo easy to shoot, it shocked me.
Posts: 693 | From: North Dakota | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I was under the impression that the hunter was a d shaped bow so was in the hill style unlike the expedition which is the R/D.
-------------------- I Corinthians 9 24-25 ...run in such a way so as to obtain the prize! Posts: 1196 | From: Stewartstown, Pa | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by khardrunner: I was under the impression that the hunter was a d shaped bow so was in the hill style unlike the expedition which is the R/D.
Now i am no expert at all, but i have been looking at Bamas a ton and just ordered one, so with that said you are right. The hunter and nicer models of the hunter are D shaped and his other style is the Expidition and it is a R/D longbow.
-------------------- >>>---TGMM Family of the Bow---> Posts: 689 | From: Montana | Registered: Apr 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
Just being D-shaped when strung is not the only thing that makes a "Hill-style" American Semi-Longbow/American Flatbow. There are mild, moderate and even radical reflex/deflex bows that brace in a true D-shape. "Hill-style" brace to a D-shape and always have straight limbs. They can be either backset, straight or string follow (bellyset) in profile.
Though Nate's bows are American Semi-Longs/Flatbows, they are not built in the "Hill-style" because the limbs are slightly flatter and wider, not "deep-cored" and narrow like Hill-style limbs.
Now I had a takedown Bama, so I can't really speak to the grip shape of one piece bows. My grip was big because of the carbon fiber sleeve. This is the only thing I did not like about the bow. It just didn't fit my hand well. I think it was a reverse teardrop, being wider in the heel and narrowing toward the toe of the grip. None of my Hill-style bows have a grip like that. Most are moderate to very deep (up to 2.25"). Some are more oval in shape, while others are very narrow, almost rectangular or teardrop (wide at toe narrowing toward the heel). From what I've seen this is what Howard's bows were like.
-------------------- "...and last of all I leave to you thrill of life and the joy of youth that throbs a moment in a well bent bow, then leaps forth in the flight of an arrow." - Saxton Pope Posts: 690 | From: Tabernacle, NJ | Registered: Feb 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by khardrunner: I was under the impression that the hunter was a d shaped bow so was in the hill style unlike the expedition which is the R/D.
Now i am no expert at all, but i have been looking at Bamas a ton and just ordered one, so with that said you are right. The hunter and nicer models of the hunter are D shaped and his other style is the Expidition and it is a R/D longbow.
Just so you know I'm not an expert either. Let's clear that up. I'm learning right along with the rest of us
Yes, the Bama "Expedition" is an aggressive, forward-riser, reflex/deflex longbow. It does not brace to a D-shape.
But like I said in my previous post, bracing to a "D" alone does not make a longbow a "Hill-style" longbow. There's more to it than that.
And I'm pretty sure that Nate's Elite Classic has VERY SLIGHTLY reflexed limbs. It's not straight limbed like a "Hill-style" longbow. I believe the Hunter model is straight limbed. Not sure about the Royal though.
-------------------- "...and last of all I leave to you thrill of life and the joy of youth that throbs a moment in a well bent bow, then leaps forth in the flight of an arrow." - Saxton Pope Posts: 690 | From: Tabernacle, NJ | Registered: Feb 2011
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- "Always feel the wind, and walk just like the leaves". ("LongBow Country"--Chad Slagle, "High, Wild, and Free"). Posts: 3961 | From: Sayreville, New Jersey | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ok so after reading this stuff again I think we are stumbling over nomenclature here. I just read Rob D's thread about his Bama. I remember reading it when it was originally posted as a matter of fact. To quote Rob, "In essence, this is an AFL (American Flat Longbow) in the Howard Hill style." I think here and in khardrunner's post that "in the Hill style" is more of an aesthetic term, referring to the way the bow looks, the D-shape.
Now I use the term "Hill-style" above to describe the way in which the bow is constructed. The limb design, the riser shape, etc. Yes, Nate's bows "look" like the bows that Howard Hill, John Schulz and Bob Swinehart (the MAN, by the way) shot. But when you get close they are constructed quite differently. Rob also said that his Hunter showed just a shade of reflex to the limbs.
Just to reiterate, Nate builds a wonderful bow, no matter what style or name we call it.
-------------------- "...and last of all I leave to you thrill of life and the joy of youth that throbs a moment in a well bent bow, then leaps forth in the flight of an arrow." - Saxton Pope Posts: 690 | From: Tabernacle, NJ | Registered: Feb 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm certainly looking for the same style bow I grew up shooting, the AFL or hill style bow. In that sense I'm thinking D shape, straight limb and grip, long and slender, smooth as butter, silent, great cast and the like.
I'm not looking for a bow with wider, flatter limbs which I guess I would consider a flat bow. Nothing against them, that's just not the style I'm looking at right this moment.
As I said before, I don't know whether the Bama fits the former or later category here as I have never seen one in person and it is hard to tell from pics. It seems like they are wonderful bows, I just don't know how they will compare to my old Tembo.
All these darn terms... we need a trad archery dictionary, complete with pictures!
So I guess the question remains, how do the bama's shoot as compared to the hill I used to have?
-------------------- I Corinthians 9 24-25 ...run in such a way so as to obtain the prize! Posts: 1196 | From: Stewartstown, Pa | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[archer]](graemlins/archer.gif)
