posted
Ive had a Rinehart deer since the first of the year and am just on the verge of getting pass throughs... Very disappointed in it. BUT I have left it out the whole time and it has been in may drenching downpours.. I also shot it when it was wet and arrow penetration was almost double.. I really like that the arrows are easy to pull... Guess I need to take better care of the next one..
Posts: 1955 | From: Texas | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Rinehart by far. Our archery club has 400+ members and we have tried all the different targets. Rinehart wins hands down. McKensie just doesn't hold up and neither does Delta.
-------------------- The Constitution shall never be construed... to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.
Samuel Adams Posts: 963 | From: Long Island, NY | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
+1 for rhineharts, glen del did not hold up for me at all! Got a blemished woodland buck from Big Jims for 99.99 + 29.99 shipping awesome targets.
Posts: 763 | From: North Branch, Michigan | Registered: May 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
The one you can replace the kill zone insert on.
-------------------- "If I had tried a little harder and practiced a little more, by now I could have been average"...Me Posts: 1511 | From: Macon, Ga. | Registered: May 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
I purchased a rhinehart feeding doe back in 2007 (I think) and it lasted for about 4 years. I bought another one last year and the quality is not what it used to be compared to my older deer target. The body is made from much cheaper foam than my target from 5 years ago. Only the removable kill zone is made from the nice self healing foam. Not sure what I will do when this target runs its course, but doubtful if I will buy another rhinehart.
Posts: 345 | From: McDonough, Georgia | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |