Trad Gang

Main Boards => The Shooters FORM Board => Topic started by: mrjsl on September 23, 2011, 04:18:00 PM

Title: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: mrjsl on September 23, 2011, 04:18:00 PM
I've shot split for a long time, and can shoot pretty decent. But, recently I've had a sore index finger, and I have an old Bear I'm trying to tune up for a friend who shoots 3 under, and........

I'm afraid I may have crossed over to the dark side and don't wanna go back. After fiddling with it long enough to develop a somewhat consistent form, I may be too accurate!

Someone tell me why I shouldn't just shoot 3 under all the time? My recurve has a B50 string - can't tell where it's any louder. It's a quiet bow to start with.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: Green on September 23, 2011, 06:57:00 PM
I'm not going to tell you...lol.  I shot split most of 42 years.  Had been going back and forth over the past year....finally went over completely about six weeks ago.  Feel like I have just that much more control over my shot.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: Flingblade on September 23, 2011, 07:05:00 PM
I shoot 3 under because I am more accurate that way.  The only reason I can think of to shoot split is if you often shoot reverse cant, but really how often do you need to shoot reverse cant.  Welcome to the "dark side".
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: ber643 on September 23, 2011, 07:10:00 PM
I switched - and it certainly seems to help my consitency, which is what i was after. It still isn't as great as I "dream of" but it did improve. That being said, I also say, "different strokes for different folks."
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: on September 23, 2011, 07:57:00 PM
I’m not going to encourage you to go back to split—I’ve been shooting 3-under for over 40 years.

The reason you’re more accurate is because you’ve shortened your gap considerably, or if you prefer, narrowed the focus of your sight picture. :^)

As to your bow being quiet, I hear lots of folks remark that their bow is louder when shooting 3-under—never been my experience, but I don’t dismiss other’s opinions.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: DannyBows on September 23, 2011, 09:21:00 PM
Welcome to the Darkside.     :scared:    Don't fight it, just go with it. If it helps it's also called Apache Draw. Sounds cool huh?

The only drawback I've heard of is shooting long distance is easier with Split. If I shoot long distance it's only on targets, and for fun, so I don't care. I'm not shooting over 20 yards on Game, 10 or 15 even better.

Nock fit is more critical and I find two nock points work best. Keeps the arrow from sliding down on you.

Have fun!
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: chuckbow on September 23, 2011, 09:27:00 PM
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: RedShaft on September 23, 2011, 09:28:00 PM
its prob cause it moves the arrow closer to your eye and enables your body and mind to work better together.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: snakebit40 on September 23, 2011, 10:22:00 PM
:bigsmyl:  

I'm never going back to split.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: trad_in_cali on September 24, 2011, 11:07:00 AM
Switched 3 months ago. Done and done with split.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: kat on September 24, 2011, 02:18:00 PM
:thumbsup:  I shoot much more accurately with three under.  I tried to go back to split a while back for the heck of it.  It just felt so awkward, I couldn't do it.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: ber643 on September 24, 2011, 02:40:00 PM
Like DannyBow I also went (back) to two nock points - always liked them anyway, and they seem to make things easier with 3 under.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: Ranger75 on September 24, 2011, 03:04:00 PM
Not trying to hijack this, but is there a greater advantage to two nock points shooting 3-under vs. split?
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: on September 24, 2011, 07:42:00 PM
Ranger75,

You may want to watch the two video's and see what you think.

 http://picasaweb.google.com/116451859615119061133/AVIs?gsessionid=7bN-7uOVO6_dYECuSkPxkA
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: Sirius Black on September 25, 2011, 06:10:00 PM
I'm fairly new to trad archery, but I have played with both styles and came to prefer the 3 under. I have 2 nock locators on my string: top brass, bottom dental floss. I'm liking it.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: rmcpb on September 25, 2011, 07:04:00 PM
Another here who has gone to three under. Was trying to use split for longer shots but have found its better to anchor a bit lower (facewalk).
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: FightingCelt on September 26, 2011, 05:24:00 PM
I too am fairly new to trad archery.  I have found myself experimenting with both styles and it seems to be that I am naturally prone to using the 3 under draw.  I do find that my acurracy with instictive shooting superior with this style...just my .02cents
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: DannyBows on September 26, 2011, 09:36:00 PM
Ranger 75--Since you're not trapping the arrow nock between your fingers, as in split finger, the lower nock keeps the arrow from sliding down the string.

Also, if you butt your index finger against the nock, then draw to anchor, the increased string angle can cause undue upward pressure on the arrow nock. I found it could affect arrow flight for me at times.

By using 2 nock points I can keep my index finger 1/4" or so below, that way when the string angle increases near anchor I get no pinching on the nock.

I use 2 adjustable tied-on nock points. There are good directions for them in the How-To forum.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: reddogge on September 27, 2011, 08:32:00 PM
Why would I try to talk you into or out of an arrow holding method? Shoot how you like and are the most effective at.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: mrjsl on September 27, 2011, 10:37:00 PM
Well, I'm still hitting what I shoot at. Had to move my nocking point up a little as many have suggested, but it's working out pretty well.

The only problem is if I try to gap shoot at 30-40 yards I lose my form a little because I'm not used to noticing the arrow at all.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: Trad-Man on September 27, 2011, 10:41:00 PM
I use a brass nock set and an eliminator button...you know...one of those rubber techy thingys...
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: ishoot4thrills on September 28, 2011, 05:59:00 AM
Why do you call shooting 3-under the "dark side"??   :confused:   There's nothing "dark" about it.

Don't let the "trad police" or the "more trad than though" group tell you 3-under isn't trad.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: Earl Jeff on September 28, 2011, 09:39:00 AM
Shot split for 30+ years and I tried 3 under 2 years ago and never went back.  :archer:
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: mrjsl on September 28, 2011, 10:17:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by ishoot4thrills:
Why do you call shooting 3-under the "dark side"??    :confused:    There's nothing "dark" about it.

Don't let the "trad police" or the "more trad than though" group tell you 3-under isn't trad.
It's not that. I've been shooting a stick bow only for  more than 15 years now and got into it when no one was "trad" and there was no internet so you wouldn't know anyway

I call it the "dark side" because it was the "other" way that I never used.

Plus, almost every really good shooter I know shoots 3 under, and while occasionally I can beat them at shoots, typically they are more consistent. So in effect, I am giving up the fight and joining the "enemy".
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: Boester19 on September 28, 2011, 04:13:00 PM
Sounds like I need to start working with 3 under!
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: AKmud on October 03, 2011, 01:11:00 AM
A big +1 to two nock points!  My groups tightened up significantly when I put a second one on.  Watch the video and you will be convinced.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: Sticks2117 on October 04, 2011, 08:22:00 AM
I shoot three under because I have to I am one of those 6 in a hundred that can't shoot split finger. I fought with it for 15 years and finally just switched to three under, this year. I have become comfortable with it and shoot more accurate. I feel as though I have gained control of my shot.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: Stingray45 on October 04, 2011, 02:53:00 PM
Nothing wrong with 3 Under! haha. I feel like I get a cleaner release going 3 under versus shooting split finger, but that could be just me. I can definitely tell in arrow flight when I shoot 3 under versus split finger, so I think that proves, to myself at least, that I'm getting a cleaner release.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: grouseshooter002 on October 04, 2011, 03:49:00 PM
Guys,
    Where do I start with shooting 3under? I've been shooting split for around 60yrs, but would like to give it a try. All of my bows are tillered for split finger so how will this affect my nocking point and so on? Anyway it will have to wait until after hunting season before I attempt to switch. Thank you for any advice you can give an old fart like me.

Regards,
Rick
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: on October 04, 2011, 05:44:00 PM
Well.... you just start. :^) You may not have to change anything, but sometimes the nocking point needs to be raised 1/8"; in effect changing the tiller of the bow.  Anchor in the same place and same way you do now. You'll probably shoot low for a few days until you get used to it.  Give it an honest try for a month or so and see how it goes.
Title: Re: Stupid 3 under shooting
Post by: grouseshooter002 on October 04, 2011, 07:57:00 PM
Jim,
   Thank you and I will do just that.

Regards,
Rick