Trad Gang
Main Boards => The Shooters FORM Board => Topic started by: valkyrie.rider on July 15, 2013, 06:42:00 PM
-
Hope this question qualifies for this forum. I just got a short (52") recurve. Havent shot it yet but have been hearing that short bows are inherantly difficult to shoot accurately. Would appreciate opinions and tips for short bows. Thanks
-
I think it is largely in the grip. I have a 56" Wes Wallace that shoots every bit as smoothly as its 62" cousin. As long as it fits your hand properly and has some weight to it, you should be fine.
-
Can't really answer. Your draw length has a lot to do with it. Short limbs can move more simply because they are short and have less inertia than longer limbed bows (not talking about limb recovery when shooting the arrow but that a short stick is easier to swing around than a long stick), finger pinch CAN become an issue for some, stacking can be a problem, or none of the above. Everyone is different and you just have to try and see if it works for you. That last statement is true though out archery.
Arne
-
Generally speaking, if people are shooting purely for accuracy, such as in the Olympics, they will choose a longer bow. Many people prefer shorter bows for hunting. I picked a shorter 58" bow for my hunting this year rather than the 62" bow that I had been shooting previously, just because I think it shoots better, aside from any advantages it may give me in the brush or a treestand. However, after hunting season when I go back to shooting 3D, I'll use my lighter draw weight 64" bow.
-
I have a 52" recurve that shoots every bit as well and as accurately as my 62" bows and I have had shorter bows in the 56-58" range that did not shoot as well. My experience has been that the individual bow or design is the factor as opposed to a problem with all bows of a certain length.
Short bows have some advantages in the field. I can shoot my 52" recurve while sitting flat on the ground with no problem while I have to worry about limb clearance with the 62". I'm interested to hear your opinion after you have had the opportunity to shoot your bow and experiment a bit. Keep us posted.
John
-
My thoughts, short bows are just as accurate as longer bows, and should be just as nice to shoot (pending design and draw length). However, they are less forgiving than longer bows, thus, giving the illusion that they are harder to shoot. Flaws will likely be accentuated with a shorter bow.
-
There was a video here of a guy shooting a Bear Kodiak Mag (52"), I believe the bow was. From 45 to 15 yards, nice tight bunch of arrows at the target.
No doubt others can do the same, so it can be done.
I like a short bow and will hopefully have a Tolke Kestral (52") before too long. My accuracy will remain to be seen...
-
I recently shot a friend's 52" Kodiak Magnum and although I could hit with it I found it twitchy and unpleasant to shoot. I'd never own one myself. Perhaps if you were in a real cramped blind and needed a short bow it would be OK but not for general shooting.