Trad Gang

Main Boards => Hunting Legislation & Policies => Topic started by: Yelperhelper on October 10, 2008, 07:29:00 PM

Title: Oklahoma SQ # 742
Post by: Yelperhelper on October 10, 2008, 07:29:00 PM
A vote of yes on this question next month will make your right to hunt, fish and trap protected by a constitional amendment. I've been seein several blogs asking the semi-educated to vote NO! So the ANTI's are working to take hold here lets show them we are united and tell ever logically minded person you know in Oklahoma to VOTE YES to keep our activities protected and remain under guidance of the OK Wildlife Dept.
Time To Rally
Title: Re: Oklahoma SQ # 742
Post by: bloodyarrow on October 21, 2008, 04:54:00 PM
ttt
Title: Re: Oklahoma SQ # 742
Post by: rbbhunt on November 05, 2008, 11:03:00 AM
It passed by a long shot!!!!!  At least we did something right!
Title: Re: Oklahoma SQ # 742
Post by: goldflinger on November 05, 2008, 03:36:00 PM
Amen, I told everyone I know to vote yes and explained why it was important. Glad to see the overwelming majority!!
Title: Re: Oklahoma SQ # 742
Post by: OkKeith on November 05, 2008, 04:13:00 PM
Bryce!

You knucklehead, I didn't know you visited here.

OkKeith (Keith Owen)
Title: Re: Oklahoma SQ # 742
Post by: Michael Arnette on November 07, 2008, 02:11:00 PM
I voted no. The second amendment and right to bare arms croud will be much easier to defeat if they are split in half. I figured it would pass though.
Title: Re: Oklahoma SQ # 742
Post by: vermonster13 on November 07, 2008, 03:36:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Michael Arnette:
I voted no. The second amendment and right to bare arms croud will be much easier to defeat if they are split in half. I figured it would pass though.
What exactly do you mean by this?