Trad Gang
Main Boards => Trad History/Collecting => Topic started by: 2fletch on March 29, 2018, 12:20:39 PM
-
I just got a very nice Bear Tamerlane that is 35# and is 69" in length. The guy that I got it from said that it had never had a string on it and had never been shot. Also, he said that it was a '67 model. I can't find a trace of anything indicating that the bow has been shot. The finish is like new, and there is no cracking in the finish.
Also, the word "DISPLAY" is stamped in the riser near the coin medallion. I'm really curious what this means. I have never seen that before. The riser is Brazilian Rosewood and Phenolic. The bow is to darn pretty for me to shoot and probably belongs in someone's nice Bear collection. Do any of you know the story behind the "DISPLAY' that is stamped into the wood? Thanks for your help.
-
If the serial number starts with a 7, it is a 67.
Sounds like you got a great one. I retrieved an old post with more info on Bear Display Bows.
-
I'm not sure about the "display" marking. Some bows were displayed just because, but others may have been marked "display" for more ominous reasons. I would do a very thorough inspection before stringing it up.
Also, I bought a '69 HC-300 Tamerlane without a mark on it. But after stringing it up and drawing it back, the finish on the limb backs cracked (cosmetic only) and in talking with the previous owner, he confirmed the bow had sat a very long time in a warm, dry location. The bow shoots fine, I'm just relaying this so you won't be surprised or disappointed if it happens.
S/N 7XXXXX does not guarantee yours is a '67. I sent you a pm with some info I wrote up regarding the Tamerlanes. Enjoy!
Here is a pic of my '64 Tamerlane...showing the SN beginning with a 7
(https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4533/26813278899_2ca82909bc_z.jpg)
-
Tamerlane HC-30 1965-1967
If it has phenolic and rosewood and serial starts with a 7, what else could it be?
The 70s models used future wood.
-
Tamerlane HC-30 1965-1967
If it has phenolic and rosewood and serial starts with a 7, what else could it be?
The 70s models used future wood.
Ah, I missed the "phenolic" part, Tony. Thanks for the heads-up.
-
The serial number is "5C32". I just looked at a 1965 catalogue and it appears that this may be the year it was made.
-
The serial number is "5C32". I just looked at a 1965 catalogue and it appears that this may be the year it was made.
Can you post some photos?
-
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
From the 1965 catalog
-
I'm going to try to post a photo.
https://i.imgur.com/nfalVvq.jpg
-
Here is the serial number.
https://i.imgur.com/JWphAwk.jpg
-
Oh, that is a sweetheart!
Drawing my HC-300 is like pushing a hot knife through butter.
-
From the 1965 catalog
I have a copy of that page, Tony. I don't have a Black Beauty (yet) but always keeping a watchful eye out. Thanks for posting. Anyone who has shot a Tamerlane is a fan for life.
-
Here is another photo. I laid gently on the grass for this.
https://i.imgur.com/y92b07o.jpg
-
Here is another photo. I laid gently on the grass for this.
https://i.imgur.com/y92b07o.jpg
Have you shot it yet?
These 69" bows can be somewhat of a bugger to string up, I use the large Selway Stringer and it works great. I have a Bear stringer that works on my HC-300 but the limb tips on the '64 are too thin and the leather cups just swallow them up.
-
Haven't shot it yet, and probably won't. I did put an old/new Bear string on it, just to hang it on the wall, but I haven't strung it. Supposedly, the bow has never been shot or even had a string on it. I'll probably enjoy looking at it for awhile and then see if a serious collector is interested in it.
-
Similar to my '66 I've owned since about '68. I used to shoot field and indoor with it.
(https://i.imgur.com/iYva2ZR.jpg)
-
Haven't shot it yet, and probably won't. I did put an old/new Bear string on it, just to hang it on the wall, but I haven't strung it. Supposedly, the bow has never been shot or even had a string on it. I'll probably enjoy looking at it for awhile and then see if a serious collector is interested in it.
Your choice, of course...and probably a sound one if you are planning on turning it. Me; I don't buy bows (or guns) to look at so I would have to string it up and shoot it, but that's just me. I will tell you this much; you don't know what you're missing!
-
The temptation is there, but I have shot several Tamerlanes. They all pulled out smooth and shot great. Because this bow is over 50yrs. old and hasn't been shot, I believe that I'll respect that tradition.
I have had a number of nice bows brought into the shop for sale, and ever now and then a gem. I'll probably have to sell it because I can't afford a nice Bear collection. Until then I'll just enjoy looking at it.
-
Ah, OK. You can feel free to take and post as many photos as you like of it here...I guarantee I'll look at them... :bigsmyl:
-
Wow! It's sure been tempting to shoot the Tamerlane. Several of the guys in our Tuesday night shoot group offered to pay to see it shot. Now I suppose I'll have to get another one to shoot. :archer2:
-
Wow! It's sure been tempting to shoot the Tamerlane. Several of the guys in our Tuesday night shoot group offered to pay to see it shot. Now I suppose I'll have to get another one to shoot. :archer2:
FWIW, the HC-30 you have is the heaviest of the three versions. My HC-300 is also heavier than my '64 T-lane but lighter draw and smoother-feeling (to me, anyway). Without a doubt, the woodwork on the early pre-HC T-lanes is the best in my eyes, but there seem to be fewer and fewer of these gems left that haven't been butchered, beat up or abused. Of the 3 models, I've seen more HC-300s on the auction sites which appear to be in far better condition; if you are searching for another, that's where I'd concentrate.
Did you get my PM regarding the T-lane links?
-
I can't remember who, but someone said that if it had three holes in the sight window then it was used to display 3 arrows on the bow. If that is true then wouldn't the bow have to have been strung? Any ideas? Right now there are what looks like 3 silver pins aligned along the sight bar.
-
Since I don't want to shoot this "display" model Tamerlane, it seemed a good idea to get another one. I just made payment on a HC-300 at 39#. I'll bet that it is going to be a shooter. :archer2: :deadhorse: :archer2:
-
I would hazard a guess you are right... :thumbsup:
-
Don, you cant go wrong getting a "backup" Tamerlane. Your 1965 is an inviting challenge for guys like me. Bear bows marked as "DISPLAY" were marked that way because something was found on final inspection that rendered the bow unsuitable for sale. Unlike some other manufacturers, Bear didnt sell "seconds" or "Blems" at a discount. (Browning sold their "seconds" as "Deluxe Laminate Bows"). It could be anything from a blemish in the finish to structural problem that was unsafe to shoot. The DISPLAY bows were given by distributors to dealers, primarily dedicated sporting good /tackle store, to promote sales, as most small dealers couldnt afford to keep a handful of Tamerlanes hanging in the store. So, careful inspection will eventually reveal why it is marked DISPLAY.
The three screws in the riser look to be for mounting a clicker. No Bear dealer would display a 1965 Tamerlane appearing to shoot three arrows. So maybe the "never shot" story is in question, perhaps because the shooter discovered the flaw as the result of stringing the bow to shoot. I recently bought a Fasco Decathalon II, a target bow of the same sort as a Tamerlane, and the first time I strung and shot it I noticed a fine vertical crack from the grip through the shelf and up into the sight window opening up under the stress....it is impossible to find with the bow unstrung. Some Loctite 420 and clamping for a few hours and that bow is stronger than new.
You will have difficulty getting a decent price for a Bear bow marked display as everyone will assume it is a structural weakness. Find the problem, fix it as needed and shoot that bow like you made it yourself!
Mark