Trad Gang
Main Boards => The Bowyer's Bench => Topic started by: Buggs on August 19, 2022, 10:58:16 AM
-
Something I have thought about doing for years, is making a laminated, glassed ELB. I have not seen an example of one and have been curious if anyone has made one? I can see some challenges in design and aesthetics trying to stay true to the traditional shape and tiller. The glass on the belly side handle area and horn nocks need some thought. As does getting a true D shape without rounding off all the glass.
I know ELB's are not very popular. I have not had one for years. Any one piece bows I have made in the past take a nasty set after being well used. But they are fun to shoot! Nothing like watching your entire arrow flight in slow motion, while your limbs are still oscillating like a tuning fork :biglaugh:
-
I made one about 10 years ago ( I found the old post but pics were not loading). https://www.tradgang.com/tgsmf/index.php?topic=150135.msg2606775#msg2606775
I did include my lay up and stack thickness formula on the post, but if I made another one I would use .010 of taper per inch instead of the .008 per inch in my original. I made a barrel tapered lam sled such that I could use full length, unspliced laminations. It was a cool bow...weighed much less than 1 lb in total.
Would love to see one if you make it.
-
Brad!! How ya been buddy?
I can see the pics but they have the p bucket logo plastered across em.
-
Hi Kenny, been great buddy! I glued up 8 bows with all my remaining laminations/glass, etc...in 2020...I figured I might as well get them in bow form as they have been sitting for nearly a decade in tubes. I finished a few of those that I glued up, but mostly have been in that knife shop!!
I stop in on the bowyers bench every now and then to see what is going on and glad to see so many others have not lost that passion! You all are continuing to make some awesome stuff.
-
Buggs I'm thinking you been eating too many carrots:)
-
Interesting :thumbsup:
-
Buggs I'm thinking you been eating too many carrots:)
Funny thing, thats what my Doc said too :laugh:
Hey bjansen, thanks for posting that link :thumbsup: Nice looking laminated ELB. Those specs are very helpful. Any info is helpful when you are experimenting!
I had calculated .009" per inch for a 68-70" bow, from old archery books I have. Of course thats for a stave bow. I was glad to see your take on the taper. Did you decided on the .010 taper because of the tip bend?
-
Yes. I kept my bow super thin (width) and it did not have the ideal curve I was looking for at full draw…the tips needed a bit more whip at .008 per inch. I would try .010 as I think that may be ideal.
-
Anything else you would do different next time?
I like to try and think of everything that could go wrong before I start a new project. :deadhorse:
-
ELB Eastern long bow?
-
Keep going east till you reach the UK
-
Not too much else I would do different!
-
Since I was in the mood, I decided to start working on a double taper sled. I soon remembered why I don't have any on hand. They are a pain to make! Got creative with the shimming real fast. Just going to do one side and will have to flip ends of the lams when grinding. Going to use MDF for the actual sled.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
The advantage of many lams becomes apparent when building a .005" dual taper sled
-
If you with a double taper sled mean a sled that can grind full lenght lams tapering to both sides, there is an easy way to make one. Make a very excact full lenght parallel lam about 1/4 inch thick, use jointer/planer or thickness sander. Seal it with finish so it will not warp or twist. Now glue tapered lams with your desired taper on that parallel lam with the thin ends butting in the middle. I sealed the tapered lams before gluing since I used water based contact glue. I used a small short haired roller to spread the glue. Since the tapered lams I used was 36 inches and I wanted a longer sled, I laid a parallel 6 inch piece in the middle with the same thickness as the thinnest end of the lams. The one I made is very exact.
-
I have also made sleds that make a lam with a .002 or .003 forward taper that goes into a .004 reverse taper, to make kind of an integrated tip wedge. To do this use same method as mentioned in my other post, but now butt the tapered lams with the thick ends meeting.
-
Another way
https://www.tradgang.com/tgsmf/index.php?topic=164696.msg2830300#msg2830300
-
Hey Buemaker, thanks for the suggestions :thumbsup: I thought about stacking some lams, but it was going to take 4 or more to get the taper I was looking for. I decided it would be easier and more accurate to use the stacked tape method. I have only done .002" or less stacking tape. I got to inch #12 of 29, and started looking thru the scrap bin for shims.
I slapped a piece of aluminum on top of my shimmed sled and that will suffice for this one project.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
-
I have done it the same way but use scrap piece's of wood and my hog sander.
It's a push threw sander, I push about 1-1/2" in a pull it back out and measure thickness and cut it off, I do this over and over. And like buggs I lay a parallel on top with super thin double sided tape.
I've made several super lam sleds, .002 change in to .005 and so forth like bue said.
-
I had to give the sled a run, so I grabbed a 6' piece of Maple and ran it thru the sander. Swapped ends and did it again. Worked good! Checked thickness in a few spots and they were consistent to .002", end to end.
I was shooting for .005" per inch taper and got .0048", so no complaints there either.
I figured this piece would be the back.
I knew it was as scrap piece of stained Maple trim, I didn't know it was Tiger stripped!
Might have to rethink my glass selection and go with clear :dunno:
The dark marks in the center are the saw marks from me not wanting to swap out the crosscut blade :knothead:
-
Curly Maple always looks good :bigsmyl:
Saw marks = character
-
The saw mark side will be erased and covered in glue! They did provide a good reference for grinding.
I think I have decided on the wood combos. It was pretty easy considering I have a small selection of full length lam material. I'm going with the Maple back, a .100" parallel lam of Purpleheart and 2 belly lams of Osage. My Osage is not the best. They were rejects, too narrow and a bit of grain runout. Should be OK, the belly will be trapped and rounded to a small profile.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Probably don't need the Purpleheart, but purple and yellow(Osage) look awesome together!
-
Looking nice Buggs.
-
Hey, thanks Roy! What started out as a curiosity, is becoming a reality.
I was so pleased how the sled worked out, I decided cut and grind the other lams.
That Maple is really white! I want it to look more like Yew sap wood, so here is a trick to antique just about any wood
(The right side of the scrap is washing soda, the left is the original stain and toner on the wood.)
Sodium carbonate. It reacts with tannin in the wood, even wood with minimal tannin like Maple. I used full concentration on this sample. I don't want it that dark, so I will thin it down about 75%.
I have done this before and know it will not affect the glue line. Still, the carbonate is very alkaline and I do neutralize it before layup. I noticed once when spraying a seal coat of shellac on some chem dyed wood, that the non neutralized carbonate turned the shellac a reddish tone. Actually looked good, but it was not the look I was going for.
-
I decided to goof around with the soda on different woods. I know there are a few bowyers here that like to play with color, so I thought I would post the results.
The full strength soda on Maple took on a green tone, looks a lot like Tulip Poplar. Not too many green woods in nature and it looks fairly natural.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
I also put some on Purpleheart, Osage and Yew
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
The Yew looks like dark Mahogany, the Purpleheart looks like Black Palm and the Osage got crazy bright!
I sanded down the maple to get an idea of the penetration. It was around .015" Not bad for a quick swipe!
-
I decided to glue up in two stages, purely out of fear of failure! I don't mind having some fancy firewood, but trash glass is a no no. The only woods I have ever had adhesion issues with are Osage and Purpleheart.
My pre-glue prep includes no solvent wipe. I block sand with 80grit, then 120grit and blow it off with clean, dry compressed air. I even put one of those can filters on the blow gun for extra insurance.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
-
I decided to goof around with the soda on different woods.
I appreciate all the experimentation you are posting Buggs.
I sanded down the maple to get an idea of the penetration. It was around .015" Not bad for a quick swipe!
I was about to ask about this when I got to the end of your post. That is pretty good penetration but the wipe definitely needs to be done close to final sanding. I may try this on the next bow I do just for something different. The maple looks very cool with that greenish tint. Do you find the washing soda at the grocery store or is it more of a specialty thing?
Mark
-
I like to experiment! And it adds to the general knowledge base, hopefully!
You are correct about timing the application, it's water based and will raise the grain slightly. Which is exactly why I checked the depth of penetration. I got this at the dollar store, but I have seen it in many grocery stores.
I use distilled water to mix. Don't know if the minerals in some tap water will affect the color. Our water is very hard, with dissolved calcium and magnesium, so I don't take chances.
It looks almost exactly like the green toned Yellow Poplar. I really like the color
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
-
Guess this has become a build along :cheesy: It would have been a lot easier just to post a screen shot of a bow, that actually build one! Oh well, now I'm committed. So I did the first phase of glue up. I have this EA-40 that seems to be the bottomless can. I don't use it much. Don't know if that the manufacturer date, or expiration date, but either way it's old!
Its also just fine for glueing up a bow. Visually looks good. Part B had the smell, so I timed how long it took to dissipate the ammonia smell. Less than 5 minutes.
(fume detector)
I know it is a point of much contention, but from experience, I can say epoxy rarely goes "bad"
These are all slow hardeners. They all have some degree of the caustic smell and they are all fine to use
If its not OK to use for a bow, then its not Ok for overlays or any other secondary uses. Throw it away, or send it to me :bigsmyl:
Glue up time, epoxy is catalyzed, the slow clock is ticking. Purple glue.
Pulled the extra glue out after 3hrs at 130deg. It's hard as a rock. I mixed 110grams and had 32grams extra.
It looks like there is enough in the cans for one more bow!
-
Sweet.
-
Something I have thought about doing for years, is making a laminated, glassed ELB. I have not seen an example of one and have been curious if anyone has made one? I can see some challenges in design and aesthetics trying to stay true to the traditional shape and tiller. The glass on the belly side handle area and horn nocks need some thought. As does getting a true D shape without rounding off all the glass.
I know ELB's are not very popular. I have not had one for years. Any one piece bows I have made in the past take a nasty set after being well used. But they are fun to shoot! Nothing like watching your entire arrow flight in slow motion, while your limbs are still oscillating like a tuning fork :biglaugh:
I would use 2 layers of .050 glass on the belly and start rounding over the belly and check the tiller until I got what I wanted, the glass May only be 3/4” or so wide.
That may solve your problems with the tips too :dunno:
-
Thats an idea that might work :thumbsup: The only problem, at least for me, would be putting $36 worth of glass
(plus shipping) on and then grinding most of it off. I figure on having to do a rounded full depth trapezoid profile, to be able to have enough belly to glass.
There is another option that I have been chewing on.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Glassing with fiberglass sleeve over the entire bow after rounding the belly into the traditional "D" shape and then grinding off the back and re-laminating with some unidirectional.
-
I chewed on it enough. I'm going to sleeve the bow. For anyone who is not familiar with biaxial braided sleeve, it like the Chinese handcuffs toy or a snake that just had a big meal. It conforms to the shape of its core. This is a piece of carbon sleeve, I'm going to use glass.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
I am also rethinking the grinding of the back and laminating unidirectional on. I might just leave the sleeve intact. It would be like a wound tube with a wood core. The braided tube is the same material a lot of fishing rod blanks are made from. Think about the bend those things can withstand, especially Fly rods whipping back and forth. It would also simplify any extra handle material added on because the sleeve would expand to accommodate.
Has anyone built, or even heard of someone building torsion box limbs?
I put some release tape on to protect the Maple back, which I was thinking was also a good idea to simplify the grinding stage later. I have a little time to change my mind if it’s coming off because I had to order the fiberglass sleeve.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Of course its transparent green. I like the green Maple!
This could end up being a green, purple and yellow bow
-
This is pretty wild using a raw glass fiber tube or sleeve. Do you have any idea how heavy this thing is going to turn out doing this? You might end up with an English war bow of 200#, or a fancy pry bar….. but …..I’m enjoying your mad scientist endeavors. :goldtooth:
I’ll be interested in seeing how you tiller this sleeved bow without sanding through the glass. Kirk
-
I'm really not sure how heavy this thing will turn out to be! I am following some old ELB measurements for a Lemmonwood bow in old style target weights of 40-45# range. Pretty sure it going to come in a little heaver that that. Tillering is definitely going to be the challenge. There is no way to tiller after its sleeved, so I am going to have to tiller it in its unglassed form. Going be dicey, getting a deep enough bend without blowing up.
Fortunately the sleeve comes in different thickness. The stuff I ordered should wet out to around .010" or so.
-
I'm really not sure how heavy this thing will turn out to be! I am following some old ELB measurements for a Lemmonwood bow in old style target weights of 40-45# range. Pretty sure it going to come in a little heaver that that. Tillering is definitely going to be the challenge. There is no way to tiller after its sleeved, so I am going to have to tiller it in its unglassed form. Going be dicey, getting a deep enough bend without blowing up.
Fortunately the sleeve comes in different thickness. The stuff I ordered should wet out to around .010" or so.
Interesting stuff right here 🤔.
One thing that struck me when you mentioned wrapping the whole pre- tillered bow is how that will relate to your description of the glass tube as similar to the finger traps. Will the characteristics of the glass change dimensionally as it is collapsed around the limb? Also, the deep limbs of an ELB will put more tension and compression demand on the glass which in turn might increase draw weight well beyond expectations and also might change the tiller as it stretches and collapses ong the length of the limb.
You are entering a new area of untracked forest. Gonna be entertaining and educational.
-
Buggs you could rip a piece of fiberglass end to end and double it up on the belly like I said before.
In my tool and Die days the KISS factor (Keep It Simple Stupid) was always the way we built things. :thumbsup:
You would need 2" wide glass more than likely. Just saying
-
I’ll be curious how she comes out…..
Years ago I did some experiments with building laminated arrow shafts using poplar, Douglas fir, and hickory. I laid up different combinations with a hickory core . 3 lams in the .200 range, then turned them….. unfortunately the weight and spine differed a lot and I had a tough time getting a matched set. I even tried some bamboo combos with similar results.
Then I tried just using two lams with a glass cloth core. It really stiffened up the shaft a lot in one direction, but these things were impossible to straighten and have them stay straight.
All in all I failed miserably…. But it was a fun endeavor. But seeing these glass and carbon sleeves, it makes me wonder if they could be used on an arrow shaft?
Might make some great fishing arrows.
Kirk
-
You are entering a new area of untracked forest. Gonna be entertaining and educational.
Thats for sure!. I have never seen reference to anybody doing a sleeve or torsion box style bow. New frontier or big mistake :laugh:
Then again, you could say the same about anything attempted for the first time. Somebody had to take a chance!
The sleeve will definitely change fiber orientation as it compresses and stretched over the bow blank. But the nature of the fibers will mean that in the small diameter sections, it will become denser and more elongated.
I am counting on the consistent tapering to provide a progressive resistance effect.
Mad Max, I was thinking the same thing after your last suggestion. That would reduce the waste and cost.
I'm thinking I really want to do a traditional round belly profile, but that won't allow for flat glass application.
Kirk, you could definitely use the sleeve on arrow shafts. It comes in different diameters, so you would need to calculate the density of the weave and thickness of the sleeve relative to the stiffness of the wood being used.
I'm thinking you would want an extremely light weight wood. If you had a teflon rod, you could just make your own fiberglass or carbon arrows, using the rod as a mandrel. Then again if you had a teflon rod, you would be a superhero and would not need any stinking arrows :saywhat:
-
Waiting for my glass sleeve to arrive. :jumper: I have done some work, "D" shaping the belly. Hard to get a good pic.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
I realized at some point along the way that after tapering the lams, establishing the side profile and rounding the belly, that it was not going to be possible to do much, if any tillering in a traditional manner. So I left the Maple back fat, so I could remove material to get my bends. I have to say it has been fun work so far. It's like working with the perfect stave that requires only rectilinear material removal, no compensating for knots or twists.
-
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
(solar collector)
Don't know if this qualifies me to post in the "Primitive" forum or not :dunno: Maybe just rednek.
Decided to build up a small handle area rather than have a fat grip wrap. If I'm shooting off a knuckle, I'll be wearing a glove, so I'm thinking a thinner grip is preferable.
-
Agree, a narrow arrow pass is preferable.
-
Did some more work on the bow. Got the belly fully D shaped and it was still too stout!
I left the Maple back fat to have material to remove. Having pre-tapered the lams, I knew once the side profile and D shape were established, tillering and weight reduction was going to happen on the back, mostly.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Been taking .040" off at a time. I also can trap the belly side a little bit. I am taking it slow and walking away after every step. Never tillered from the back before! The other funky factor is the floor tillering. This bow is not intended to be drawn in its unbacked state. I am worried about bending it too far and splintering some runout grain.
I'm thinking its around 60# right now. Want to get it down to around 40# or so. I don't know how much draw weight the glass sleeve will add?
-
Just asking
Why can’t you tiller the belly?
A block of wood concave shaped like the belly with sandpaper on it.
I was at the Tennessee classic one year and a guy had a sanding block like that for finishing the tiller.
I hope you hit your weight :thumbsup:
-
I’m not very experienced at building many board bows, but I’ve always assumed the tillering should be done after the backing.I would think That the backing is going to add draw weight and will throw the tiller off. Am I wrong about that?
What kind of backing are you using? Kirk
-
What kind of backing are you using? Kirk
Short attention span? I'm using fiberglass sleeve.
So I could tiller the belly, but since it's pre-tapered and the bow is unglassed at this point, I would be risking a terminal failure if the belly is reduced to much, as it's being tillered.
The sleeve will certainly add some weight, how much is unknown. Considering the nature of the reinforcement, it should provide consistent and modulated strength along the length of the limbs. Of course this is all speculation if this has never been done before ;)
-
It looks to me the maple backing it way too thick. I didn't see how thick it is but 1/8" or a little less is usually plenty for most wood backings. Also, I don't use FG on bows but I would imaging that by adding the FG sleeve you will be adding considerable weight. I guess the only way to find out is to do it. You might do a test with a section of glued up woods and test the bend before and after the FG is added.
-
I was meaning before the glass is put on.
I don’t know anything about that kind of bow.
You have a hard challenge for yourself :thumbsup:
I’m having a hard time texting on my phone today, I use my laptop mostly
-
I forgot to ask about that fancy tool.
That’s for scribing lines?
-
Maybe I missed reading something or misread something, but what are you trying to accomplish by using this f/g sleeve?? Is it this torsion box thing?? Are you hoping for added performance or something along that nature?? Do you know there is a chance the fibers will fracture or separate and turn white when the bow is flexed?? Do you also know that the sleeve will be adding a good bit of weight to the limbs??
Just my 2 cents...
In any account I suggest you add at least a 3/16" radius to any corners so that the glass lays flat...
-
The Maple backing is way too thick. By design, thats how I'm reducing weight.
The fancy tool is a fine adjust marking gauge wheel, makes it easy to see and feel when I've removed a tiny bit.
I am trying to accomplish something new and different. Why? Why not! I'm using the F/G sleeve because I could not think of another way to glass the "D" shaped belly. There is a good chance that all those things and more could happen. Only one way to find out. It's kind of fun venturing into the unknown.
My original idea, and one that I might revisit, is to glass with the sleeve, grind off the back portion and reglass with some uni. As of right now there is no established protocol to follow, so everything is on the table!
-
10-4... Hope it all works for yah...
-
What kind of backing are you using? Kirk
Short attention span? I'm using fiberglass sleeve.
So I could tiller the belly, but since it's pre-tapered and the bow is unglassed at this point, I would be risking a terminal failure if the belly is reduced to much, as it's being tillered.
The sleeve will certainly add some weight, how much is unknown. Considering the nature of the reinforcement, it should provide consistent and modulated strength along the length of the limbs. Of course this is all speculation if this has never been done before ;)
Oooops! Guilty as charged with the backing question.
It will be interesting to see your exact weight gain after putting this glass sleeve on it. I think you will be looking at about 30% increase. A 40# bow will become 60#, and your current 60#, a 90#….
Keep us in the loop on this. I’m curious how it goes. Kirk
-
Glass sleeve came in the mail today. Nice and thin. Should not wet out to more than .020" and I will loose some of that thickness during smoothing.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Another interesting property of this biaxial sleeve is that it can be effectively pre-tensioned.
-
It will be interesting to see your exact weight gain after putting this glass sleeve on it. I think you will be looking at about 30% increase. A 40# bow will become 60#, and your current 60#, a 90#….
Umm, 40# to 60# and 60# to 90# are both 50% increases, not 30%... That aside, I am also interested in seeing what adding the sleeve does to things.
Buggs, what are you using for the resin? Make sure you take some pictures of how the bow core is bending before you add the sleeve and then the same after the sleeve is on.
Mark
-
Well in my head I was thinking in thirds…. 20,40, 60 but screwed up the percentage increase. :dunno: :knothead:
Shredd has a bunch of glass experience that I’ve never dabbled in. His estimate would most likely be much closer than mine. I’ve still got a few sticks of his colored glass he laid up years ago that I’ve never used that I’d be willing to give to to someone that wants to play with it… it’s a wild looking electric green color.
Kirk
-
Mark, this is a description of the epoxy I will be using; [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Kirk, I am wondering how you came up that 30% figure, not knowing the thickness of the fabric and resulting laminate layer?
-
Mark, this is a description of the epoxy I will be using;
Kirk, I am wondering how you came up that 30% figure, not knowing the thickness of the fabric and resulting laminate layer?
My ball park 30% comes from building a lot of glass backed bows. Sanding glass reduces draw weight about 1# for .002 of glass. on a 40# wood bow adding .040 worth of glass would give you an additional 20#.... Plus... this glass runs around the sides too.... It may be more than that....Who knows?
You will find out soon enough... I'll be curios.... Kirk
-
I have been considering what to do for the nocks on this bow. I have some nice Horn [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
But since its not traditional ELB, I was thinking non trad tips might not look too funky. I keep seeing pictures of dyed Tagua nuts and really like the colors, so I got some good old Rit dye at the grocery and commenced to experimenting.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
It works real good!
I was wanting a Jade color, but they only had a few color options locally. Rit has a formula chart for all kinds of colors, so I should be able to get close to the green I want. I did a hot dye bath in the mini Crock pot. Soaked for an hour and then added some washing soda to fix the color and let that soak for another hour. Then it got dropped in a bucket of detergent water and soaked over night. Almost no color came out in the final soak.
Here is a before pic. [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Lots of tool marks, no point to polishing it before this. Carved, polished and dyed, I think it could make some cool looking tips.
-
it’s a wild looking electric green color
You got any close up pics, Kirk?
-
Here is that green glass Shredd laid up years ago. it's .060 -.065 and seriously heavy in weight. If this is what he was using building bows it's no wonder he was struggling to get 190 FPS out of his testing. I have no use for it myself and would gladly send it to you Buggs.... btw... its 1.5" X 38.5"
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ] [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
-
Here is that green glass Shredd laid up years ago. it's .060 -.065 and seriously heavy in weight. If this is what he was using building bows it's no wonder he was struggling to get 190 FPS out of his testing. I have no use for it myself and would gladly send it to you Buggs.... btw... its 1.5" X 38.5"
Making glass was just something he wanted to do :thumbsup:
He’s been trying to give it away to anyone
-
Thanks for the offer Kirk, but I'll pass. Heavy hand laid glass like that has a bad fiber to resin ratio. Slow moving mass. I was mostly curious about the color. You could always do a burn test with it and find the true ratio ;)
I'll give him credit for all the time and effort that it must have took, making that laminate.
-
Thanks for the offer Kirk, but I'll pass. Heavy hand laid glass like that has a bad fiber to resin ratio. Slow moving mass. I was mostly curious about the color. You could always do a burn test with it and find the true ratio ;)
I'll give him credit for all the time and effort that it must have took, making that laminate.
I could use it on a kids bow for it’s indestructible quality at low draw weight. I’ve had it for years and every time I consider using it, I talk myself out of it.
Kirk
-
I went ahead and made a gizmo after seeing Pat B. using one. What a great little tool!
Simple, effective, ingenuity :notworthy:
It's definitely designed for a flat belly bow, it was hard to keep it on the ridge of this round belly ELB.
I came up with a self centering mod.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ] [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
If I were going to make more of these style bows, I would figure out something more permanent.
The other mod I would make to the gizmo is a different marking device. Don't like that the distance the pencil protrudes out the bottom changes as the lead wears away. A non-permanent roller ball pen would work, just have to figure out how to adjust it.
-
Been picking away at it.
Thats as far as I'm drawing it, 19" Scares me every time I do it :scared: I'm not done tillering, but thats as far I'm pulling on it. So it weighs in at 12.5kg@19" I checked another straight limbed bow for comparison, 50#@28" equaled 14kg@19"
Check out my swanky shop floor scale. It's carpeted and it weighs in kilos and Stones!
-
With many bows it's about 3# per inch of pull so you can estimate draw weight out to full draw length. :thumbsup:
The bow looks a bit stiff at the inner 1/3 of both limbs. Traditional ELBs have a stiff handle area, out a couple of inches then start bending. The European war bows were tillered to the arc of a circle but at 100#+ they needed the whole bow to share the strain.
-
With many bows it's about 3# per inch of pull so you can estimate draw weight out to full draw length. :thumbsup:
The bow looks a bit stiff at the inner 1/3 of both limbs. Traditional ELBs have a stiff handle area, out a couple of inches then start bending. The European war bows were tillered to the arc of a circle but at 100#+ they needed the whole bow to share the strain.
That’s really interesting Pat. Could you tell me what the advantages are for having the limb start bending out a couple inches from the handle rather than the outer portion?
The reason I ask is …..that I spent a lot of time designing different take down limbs and pushing the working portion out further was always beneficial.
I’m sincerely interested in your thoughts on this. Kirk
-
Thanks for the feedback Pat. I agree, its stiffener the handle. Going to be working on that.
One thing I do have to consider is that the glass sleeve density will get progressively more pronounced as it is pulled tight down toward the tips. Which makes me think I should tiller with a weaker tip than normal :dunno:
Kirk, Pat will have a better answer than I, but I believe without glass protecting the back and belly, a bow need to be tillered to take advantage of the maximum amount of working limb to distribute the strain. Look at Bue's flight bow as an example.
-
Kirk, the traditional ELBs were sporting/target bows back in the Victorian times, 1800s. Most were relatively light in draw weight because both women and men participated. I think the stiff handle area made the bows more forgiving and smoother shooting for the general public participating. In those days they were shooting what was known as a York round;a men's round in archery consisting of 72 arrows fired at 100 yards, 48 at 80 yards, and 24 at 60 yards. The women's round weren't as many shots and not as long a distance.
-
That’s really interesting Pat. Could you tell me what the advantages are for having the limb start bending out a couple inches from the handle rather than the outer portion?
The reason I ask is …..that I spent a lot of time designing different take down limbs and pushing the working portion out further was always beneficial.
I’m sincerely interested in your thoughts on this. Kirk
The reason you can't push the bending portion out so far is that ELB's are wood bows and you need as much limb bending as possible to carry the strain. With FG limbs you can concentrate the bend in a much smaller portion of the limb without blowing it up.
Mark
-
Exactly Mark...
-
That’s really interesting Pat. Could you tell me what the advantages are for having the limb start bending out a couple inches from the handle rather than the outer portion?
The reason I ask is …..that I spent a lot of time designing different take down limbs and pushing the working portion out further was always beneficial.
I’m sincerely interested in your thoughts on this. Kirk
The reason you can't push the bending portion out so far is that ELB's are wood bows and you need as much limb bending as possible to carry the strain. With FG limbs you can concentrate the bend in a much smaller portion of the limb without blowing it up.
Mark
That makes sense to me ….. but… in this case Buggs is going to use this fiberglass sleeve. I think having the working limb out further might be beneficial. Maybe not… I have very little experience with these type bows. I was truly curious…. You Never stop learning in this trade…. I’ll be interested in seeing how this plays out.
Kirk
-
Kirk, the traditional ELBs were sporting/target bows back in the Victorian times, 1800s. Most were relatively light in draw weight because both women and men participated. I think the stiff handle area made the bows more forgiving and smoother shooting for the general public participating. In those days they were shooting what was known as a York round;a men's round in archery consisting of 72 arrows fired at 100 yards, 48 at 80 yards, and 24 at 60 yards. The women's round weren't as many shots and not as long a distance.
I’ve actually seen the York Round competitions before. I grew up in a town named Sherwood, in western Oregon. Each year at the Robin Hood festival an archery team from England would travel there to compete. It was an awesome archery display. Some of those guys were amazing with those stick bows…. Kirk
-
I don't build glass bows or understand all the engineering aspects of them. When I build a wood bow I basically take everything off that doesn't look like a bow. Not really quite that simple but my goal in "primitive" archery has always been to make it as simple as possible but still be effective.
-
I'm a firm believer of maximum working limb bows. You got potential energy storing mass, might as well take advantage of it.
The reason you can't push the bending portion out so far is that ELB's are wood bows and you need as much limb bending as possible to carry the strain. With FG limbs you can concentrate the bend in a much smaller portion of the limb without blowing it up.
Mark
Yeah, exactly. I think I said the same thing :thumbsup:
-
I think there must be something to that with self bows and board bow with more limb travel and longer area storing energy. While these will not be as efficient using lighter weight shafts due to much lower preload at brace, they will in fact launch a heavier shaft with authority….
I Was amazed at seeing one of the ASL designs with a B-55 string get better performance rating using heavier shafts than a fast flight string using lighter shafts….I didn’t believe it until I tested it myself. It kind of blew my preload theory all to smithereenies . I think the momentum of the heavier shaft must have something to do with it…. :dunno: I couldn’t tell ya… Kirk
-
Folks diss on slow bows, but hey would you rather get smacked with a baseball going 100mph or a bowling ball going 50mph?
-
Since I only make all wood bows, speed was never a factor in my designs.
I made a bow for a guy that chronograph it at 175 fps out of a 53 pound all wood bow.
I thought that was pretty decent.
-
Folks diss on slow bows, but hey would you rather get smacked with a baseball going 100mph or a bowling ball going 50mph?
Neither one actually... :biglaugh: Both of them would get the job done nicely and probably be fatal.
Since I only make all wood bows, speed was never a factor in my designs.
I made a bow for a guy that chronograph it at 175 fps out of a 53 pound all wood bow.
I thought that was pretty decent.
175 is a pretty flat shooting bow, and at typical hunting yardage would be hard to tell the difference vs 190 fps.
The faster shooting bows hold their flat trajectory longer further down range. For competitive 3D archers shooting unmarked yardage it's a serious advantage, but it comes in real handy hunting in brushy areas too where you are shooting though small windows. Bottom line is hitting your mark. To each his own..... Kirk
-
Folks diss on slow bows, but hey would you rather get smacked with a baseball going 100mph or a bowling ball going 50mph?
So, if one were hit by each simultaneously from each side which way would you fall? 🤔
-
Down...
-
How long is this gonna take, Buggys-Boy?
Tapping toes waiting here...
-
Folks diss on slow bows, but hey would you rather get smacked with a baseball going 100mph or a bowling ball going 50mph?
So, if one were hit by each simultaneously from each side which way would you fall? 🤔
I think thats pretty obvious. A baseball player rarely falls down after being hit by an errant pitch.
How long is this gonna take, Buggys-Boy?
Tapping toes waiting here...
Considering I move like a glacier, I'll probably melt before I get it done :laughing:
-
You would fall down, doesn’t matter which side you fall on once on the ground.
Learned that from a few Bar fights while getting smacked in the head from two sides at the same time.!!!,
Read between the lines and you’ll get the moral of the story. !!!lol
-
I was getting frustrated using the gizmo on the round, skinny belly, and I had an idea.......
Here it is, Gizmo V2 or the Gizmod; [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Its 9/16" wide and the hole is stepped for a very tight friction fit of the marker. The narrow width is so much easier to keep on the spine of the belly and the marker does not wear away and change the depth of indication.
-
Make a gizmo like this boy:)
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
-
When I use a Gizmo on a rounded belly I don't just use it down the center of the limb but also alone both sides of the belly. It also shows limb twist doing it this way.
-
My first thought was also a "V" groove or concave contact surface, but I quickly realized with a mock up that as the limb widened, it lost contact with the belly.
-
If ya would lay off the Tequila before ya work on a bow, the Gizmo might track down the center of a rounded belly. :laughing: :thumbsup:
-
How did you know I like Tequilla? :wavey:
-
Good guess:)
-
Why do you guys use those gismos for tillering anyway? Something wrong with yer eyeballs? :dunno:
Kirk
-
With selfbows the Gizmo is a big help because of the irregularities with staves.
-
Why do you guys use those gismos for tillering anyway? Something wrong with yer eyeballs? :dunno:
Kirk
Gizmo, it no lie. Plus it keeps you from getting too rambunctious and removing too much too fast. For me that is a big plus!
-
Had to step away from this for a while. There are a few challenges with a bow that has to be pre-tillered and I needed to think on it, rather than just go for it. The lams I am using all have grain runout in two directions and were never meant to be drawn with out glass backing. Makes it difficult to put any bend into it without fear of a fracture or explosion!
This is as far as I dare bend it unglassed
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Thats 6", about brace height. When a quarter turn of the Gizmo marker is the difference between no markings and a continuous line on the limb, the limit has been reached.
I put a little reflex into it at glue up and am pleased to see that it has retained 1/4". Thought that would have pulled out by now. I think the round, fat Osage belly has something to do with that.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
Now I need to sand this blank smooth as glass so I can slip the braided sleeve over without snagging!
-
Good to see this build-along back in motion! :shaka:
-
Thanks onetone, this is partially your fault now :biglaugh:
-
:goldtooth:
-
Sanded the crap out of it yesterday, down to 400. I have not done a lot with Osage, always have a challenge with the stuff. I had to be careful sanding, or the Osage would stain the Maple! As I was sanding, I was thinking about coloring the Tiger stripe and I did mess around with a bunch of dyes. In the end I decided it might not be worth doing a three step process, especially not knowing how ugly its going to be with the sleeve, or even if it going to work! I ended up just doing a wipe with washing soda, gives it a little age. You can see its like a sun tan, compared to some untouched Maple
The other thing I have been thinking on, is how to press the epoxy soaked sleeve onto the bow?
I could pull the sleeve real tight and leave it open to the air, but it would have to be on a spit to keep the epoxy from sagging
I have some heat shrink tape which would work, but its 1" wide and there is no way I'm going to spiral wrap 6' of bow with 1/2" overlap. Plus I would still need the spit to spiral wrap.
I also have some antique shrink wrap left over from my wife's retail business, but I could not get it to suck up tight enough before it started to melt. Pallet wrap would probably work, but I cant get a small quantity.
Then I had the light bulb moment!
Heat shrink tube. Its thin wall polyolefin, so epoxy won't stick. It shrinks 2/1 so I need two sizes and unfortunately my supply house only had the 3/4" in stock. Hopefully the 1.5" will be here soon :laughing:
-
Why mess with the epoxy sleeve at all?…. Just use the heat shrink tubing, and call er good! :biglaugh:
I’ll be interested to see what kind of draw weight you get out of this thing Buggs…
Id bet she’s going to be seriously heavy.
What kind of draw weight have you got targeted?
-
A vacuum pump and plastic sleeve comes to mind … but I don’t know if that would work and more tooling would be required. :dunno:
-
A vacuum pump and plastic sleeve comes to mind … but I don’t know if that would work and more tooling would be required. :dunno:
Foodsaver! :biglaugh:
I used it when I was messing around with hex mat. It worked.
-
Why mess with the epoxy sleeve at all?…. Just use the heat shrink tubing, and call er good! :biglaugh:
I’ll be interested to see what kind of draw weight you get out of this thing Buggs…
Id bet she’s going to be seriously heavy.
What kind of draw weight have you got targeted?
Thats an interesting idea.......But I think the tubing gets too brittle after its shrunk, to have any longevity.
I was thinking a draw weight of 50-60lbs would be nice :dunno: If it turns out heavy, I will give it to someone younger and stronger than me :)
-
I could not resist doing a dry run with the sleeve. Good thing, I was planning on sizing the bow with a thin layer of epoxy before slipping :laughing: the sleeve on. No way in hell is that going to happen. This sleeve auto constricts!
It only goes on by one method, but once its on its like it sucks itself on like a Boa constrictor.
I know it will get squirmy when it's wet out, but dry its like Chinese handcuffs. At this point I am dying to know how this might turn out. Its serious torsion box construction. It could be a beast, but the glass is thin. Wet out it should be around .015"-.020", so hopefully not too stiff. I plan on using the most elastic epoxy I have.
-
All ahead full! :thumbsup:
-
Your best bet is going to be using a bag and vacuum on that Baby Buggs. A small vacuum pump is not real expensive either....
I'm afraid you are going to end up with small voids and an inconsistent pressure doing it any other way. I know you are champing at the bit to do this, but a bit more invested might yield a better product.
Check these out... there is a wide range of small pumps that would work for you...
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=vacuum+pumps+for+laminations&crid=1XFJAE60AWEC4&sprefix=vacuum+pumps+for+laminations%2Caps%2C168&ref=nb_sb_noss_2
Here is some good info and a source for bags....
https://www.fibreglast.com/product/vacuum-bagging-equipment-and-techniques-for-room-temp-applications/learning_center
-
Well, Kirk Daddy-O, that is a good idea and I had thought about it. I do have a vac pump [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
The one problem is that with a vac bag, the finish surface is the tool, or pattern side. In this case that would be the wood surface, which leaves the bag side a bit ratty. The shrink tube should leave a smooth surface. I really don't want to spend much time sanding on this!
-
I was hopeful the shrink tube would get here yesterday, but no such luck. Looks like Monday. I'm getting itchy fingers! Dying to know if this will work or be a bust! I do have some trepidation about the Osage. This bow is only the second success glueing the stuff. Any recommendations from Osage lovers for prep?
-
Why couldn't you shrink tube it.... Then bag it under vacuum ? Win - Win me thinks...
I'm curious how this baby comes out too. :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
-
I appreciate all the ideas. As this is uncharted territory, I would be a fool not to consider all observations!
Kirk, are you thinking about the vacuum as a tool to extract all the free air? I thought about doing a resin infusion, but some fabrics don't wick very well under vacuum and I don't know about this biaxial sleeve?
Have not found an example of someone doing a infusion
-
I was hoping to get this thing glassed, but it's been sub-zero and I cant get my shop much over 50deg. Too cold for epoxy work. Supposed to be warmer Friday. I certainly hope so, it was -20deg this morning when me and the dog went out!
-
-20 isn't bad:)
:laughing: :wavey:
-
-20 isn't bad:)
:laughing: :wavey:
If your a mummy :bigsmyl: Me, I'm composed of 60% water and move like old molasses when it gets this cold
-
Hiya, I had a similar itch a few years back.
I also ended up speaking to “bjansen”.
He was incredibly helpful.
I built a form and built some bows on it.
I made the form so I can build them either with string follow or with backset.
I built the handle (belly side only) up with a layer of leather so it didn’t impede the working handle, shaped to comfort and then a leather handle wrap.
Horn nocks.
It came in right at around 46#.
This one was built with all yew lams.
It’s not the very fastest bow, but still quite reasonable considering the length (68”ntn) the design and the built in string follow.
I will hunt with it with confidence!
-
Very nice, Wayne. :thumbsup:
-
No kidding, that is very nice! Sweet, round tiller :thumbsup:
-
Nice looking bend to that bow Wayne!
I'm sorry to hear your are having to keep your brass monkey indoors Buggs.... We have got a Pineapple express series of storms coming out of the south pacific and its 50 degrees and wet here..... Well wet may be an understatement. Down right soggy is more like it.... But the ducks are jazzed, and i can easily keep my shop at 70 degrees without running the ball bearing off my heater.
Looking forward to seeing how this bow comes out with the glass tube.... Yes... I believe that vacuum will pull out the air pockets and infuse the resin into the glass with no voids. i think that is important. Kirk
-
I think I will take your advice Kirk and vac the whole shebang after it gets tubular. Can't cause any problems and it might be beneficial like you suggest. :thumbsup:
-
Well looks like our pineapples will be frozen by Saturday…… none of that -20 stuff here, but possibly 17 degrees on Sunday morning with a few snow days to follow.
When it starts getting that cold, I gather up anything that can freeze and put it in my spray booth and keep the lights on, and don’t bother trying to heat the shop. Fortunately it never lasts too long around here, and we’ll be back to rain again.
Looking forward to seeing how this bow of yours comes out. Hopefully it isn’t a 90# monster bow. Kirk