Trad Gang
Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: DawgDoc on June 15, 2023, 05:20:14 PM
-
I have never had a good set of binoculars to hunt with - does anyone have suggestions of a good pair and magnification recommended. I live in South Georgia so I would say sighting distance is usually short due to vegetation but would be nice to have a little larger binocular for when you can see several hundred yards.
-
Yes, no more than 8 power. Same here in N GA.
I'll be back in a bit to post what I'm gonna buy.
-
Funny you should ask. I recently did a test on quite few binoculars and ended up with Maven, since I am out west, I went with 10 x 42 but as Terry suggested 8 would work well in your situation.
-
Buy the best you can afford. Look at them as a long term investment. I bought a pair of Swarovski's 8x30 32 years ago and they are still going strong. So I'm at about $12 a year now.
I carry them on every hunt from whitetails to Texas javelina and hogs, mule deer out west and elk. Great for picking out that movement or spot at 50 yards in the whitetail woods.
-
check out the Hawke Endurance ED 8x32 or 8x42 :archer:
-
Leupold Yosemite 6x30 good size, just on the upper end of compact. Good for the occasional 75-80 yard appraisal.
:campfire: :coffee: :archer2: :campfire:
-
I have four pair of binoculars but my favorite are my Swarovski 8X30. They are a little pricey. :scared:
-
I've had Steiner, Nikon, Vortex, Optolyth, Leupold all have served well. Still use the Leupold for tight stuff and Vortex 10x42 for general hunting. The Optolyth are 8x56 and used when weight is not worried about.
:campfire: :coffee: :archer2: :campfire:
-
Some folks say Swarovski is the gold standard for bino's. I had a pair of SLC 8x30's that I bought almost 30 years ago and recently sold them for just a little less than I gave for them.
I wanted something a bit lighter that could go in a fanny pack to be used primarily in the dense vegetation of the southern swamps. I settled on the Swarovski CL pocket glasses in 8 x 25. They don't match the light gathering ability of SLC's but they are still darn good...and the price is a little more reasonable....sort of.
That said Swarovski products are very pricey and not many folks aren't going to need or want a set of glasses to that standard of quality. But...they are a lifetime investment that if you can justify the cost....you will never regret buying through the years.
-
I have a set of Zeiss 10x40 bino’s and a set of Zeiss 8x30 bino’s, both pair are about 25 years old and still going strong, I tend to use the 8x30’s a lot more than I do the 10x40’s. They were crazy expensive new, but I don’t regret buying them one bit.
-
My Steiners and Optolyth are clearer than some of the other, and I got them while in Germany. The Steiners I was able to go to the factory and buy a "second" ha-ha is that even a thing? Optolyth uses Zeiss lens and puts them in similar shaped bodies at 1/3 the price.
:campfire: :coffee: :archer2: :campfire:
-
I’m really partial to the Swarovski’s but keep the recommendations coming - I really at the point I want a lifetime pair. While we are discussing does anyone have a harness they like?
-
I'm not sure I have the much lifetime left to make Swarovski worth the investment!!!
:campfire: :coffee: :archer2: :campfire:
-
My four. Center Point 16X50. Steiner M22, 7X50. Swarovski 8X30. Vortex 10X28.
Bought the Steiners when I was stationed in West Germany with the U.S. Army.
-
I agree with buying the best you can afford. Most of my hunting is in the SE and midwest, and 8x is plenty for that terrain. I bought some Leica 8x32 over 20 years ago and consider them money well spent. They go with me on every hunt and are just as clear today as they were when I bought them.
-
I just went through the same thing. As I have gotten older, it is tougher for me to see in low light. After reading a lot of bino threads and watching even more comparison videos of YT, I decided to go for it and get the Swarovski EL 8.5x42. Only had them 4 days so far, but love them. All the articles and videos seemed to have the same conclusion, Sawro's are the best and brand X is almost as good. Maybe if it wasn't for my aging eyes, almost as good would have been fine and saved me $800-$1000. Warranty and customer service is also the best with Swaro's.
-
Mazven b3 8X30's on a rick young harness is hard to beat for what you need. If I wanted best bang for the buck and not be afraid to use and abuse them that's the route I'd go. I used that exact set up for a few year and really liked it. Since then I have upgraded to a pair of Zeiss Victory SF 8X32's in a small marsupial harness. I go and hunt a little bit of everything so the Zeiss 8X32 is a good middle of the road option that can handle about any situation. Very satisfied with that set up no doubt.
-
Buy the best you can afford and work the best for you.
I always have a set of 10x40 Leopold in my truck, and 10x40 in my wife’s car for looking at critters.
I had a Swarovski 8x30 for several years then bought a compact 10x25 Leica, hardly ever used the 8x30’s and sold them. I really like the lightweight 10x25’s and have used them for over 20 years.
I did breakdown and buy a set of Swarovski 10x42 NL PUR’s last year, they are about as good as they get. That said, Hunter has a set of range finding 10x42 Leica’s that are every bit as good as my Swarovski’s.
-
I have always used the best bino I could afford and right now I use Swarovski 10x50 EL. .
-
I bought a pair of Zeiss 20 years ago,and they look like the day I bought them. I like the Zeiss better than any other myself,but when you get to that price range they are all good,and you should go somewhere that you can look at them all. The big outdoor superstores will have them all,and you can compare them. I should have gone with some 8 by something instead of 10 power for what I do,but they serve the purpose.
-
I’ve tried a few and for general purposes I use my 8x30 Swarovski. I had 10x40 Leicas- beautiful glass, but too heavy for me.
Actually, when I am bowhunting I usually just leave a pair of 8x20 Zeiss in my Safari-Tuff quiver pouch they work well enough. I’ve used them to pick out a deer back in the foliage from my deer stand when I originally just saw movement.
-
For whitetail hunting in the east, I think the best configuration is a good pair of 7x42s. Unfortunately, not many companies are making that configuration. Most offer an 8x40 or 42s instead. Seven power is plenty of magnification for the east and the 6mm exit pupil is excellent in low light, better than 8x42s. My Leica 7x42s are excellent optically but are a little bulkier than they need be. The discontinued Zeiss Classic 7x42s were about ideal.
-
I have never had a good set of binoculars to hunt with - does anyone have suggestions of a good pair and magnification recommended. I live in South Georgia so I would say sighting distance is usually short due to vegetation but would be nice to have a little larger binocular for when you can see several hundred yards.
I would recommend 6-8x for the magnification for the denser hardwoods forest types of terrain. I hunt similar landscapes to GA here in AR and use the Swarovski 8x30 CL Companions. I chose these mostly because they were smaller and lighter than most other 8x binoculars and the only ones in a similar size were by Maven when I bought mine. I knew nothing of Maven customer service or long term support but Swaro should be there forever. They cost a good bit but I'll have them for a lifetime. My previous pair was some Leupold 6x Yosemite and while I liked them I found myself having eye strain through them that I don't get with the Swarovski glass but I also have a lot of eye issues and am more susceptible to eye strain than the average person.
-
It all comes back to the axiom, "Buy the best ones you can afford." Try out as many as you can in close to realistic conditions, not just under the lights in the store.
:campfire: :coffee: :archer2: :campfire:
-
I bought a pair of Kowa yf 8x30 last year and am very happy with them. I hunt similar terrain here in Missouri. They are compact and pick up light very well. The price point is also very good for the quality you get. If I had to glass hillsides all day I would get a different pair but I can rarely see more than a 100 yards even in the winter where I hunt.
-
Buy the best you can afford. Look at them as a long term investment. I bought a pair of Swarovski's 8x30 32 years ago and they are still going strong. So I'm at about $12 a year now.
I carry them on every hunt from whitetails to Texas javelina and hogs, mule deer out west and elk. Great for picking out that movement or spot at 50 yards in the whitetail woods.
YES! I have those cause I can use them anywhere, but I got a deal on some Vortex 10s years ago for out west. If I could only use one power for every thing, I would pic the 8s
-
I too got a super deal on aa pair of 10x42 Vortex Diamond back HDthat were out of box when I worked retail. Would like a pair of 8x40, if I ever came across them.
:campfire: :coffee: :archer2: :campfire:
-
Hunting I generally use my East German Zeiss Jenna. 7X40 A bit heavy but almost unbreakable. Quality glass with range finding
reticle.
Not good for birding or fast viewing changes, each side has focus/diopter
adjustment--I generally set them once I'm in my hunting spot and leave
'em.
Birding and general use my Optolyth. 8 X 40 Quality glass, light weight, harder to find in the USA these days--IF I could only have
one set from those I currently own, these would be it.
Travel when I still want some bino's Steiner's. 8 X24 Smallest I really like to go, could use for hunting-just have not, good quality
for price. Other uses as well, day trips in the canoe, birding, etc.
In the kitchen for backyard viewing--old Brunton's 7 X 42--first pair ever bought with earnings from first job outta college. Well
used
Tiny chinese cheapos in the middle, 8 X 21 I got in a gift box, live in the vehicle...actually used them on a backcountry trip when
I forgot a better set...I suppose better than nothing....
Buy the best glass you can afford---as you can see many people have more than one pair.
-
A small pair of Vortex 8x30 or 8x42 should be perfect for you and won't break the bank.
-
A small pair of Vortex 8x30 or 8x42 should be perfect for you and won't break the bank.
And yes, haven't seen you post back.... I had some Nikons once also, and they were great..... just too big for me, so I sold them.
I like this model because they are nice the the feature that they LOCK into your preferred position. Thinking about getting these for the future Laredo Tusk Roundups.....
These....
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1703347-REG/nikon_16770_8x30_prostaff_binocular.html
Or these for more light at low light and they lock...
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1703392-REG/nikon_16772_8x42_prostaff_p7_binocular.html
-
I have a few sets.
Nikon 8x42 monarchs (first gen) nice but big compared to rest
Steiner 8x32 Merlin, these are great but heavy
Vortex 8x32 by far my favs! Light and compact and amazing glass for the price and work great in the eastern thick timber and small fields we have.
So for me I’d recommend the vortex diamond back HD’s. Only ones I’d like to try are leica’s 8x32. Just no one in my town Carry’s them to try.
-
Like Tim I got a pair of Vortex 8x28 compacts. Was going to buy the 8x32's for better light gathering, but the tec I talked to said the 8x28's had more eye relief were better for eyeglass wears. I am very happy with them for bow hunting in Minn. swamps.
-
...8x is the sweet spot... nice field of view, steadier image, and faster to focus at closer ranges...
...I have a pair of 8x42 that will slip in and out of a coat pocket...
... one thing that needs mentioning is, things change, and choices narrow if you wear eyeglasses...
...check the specs for long eye relief, and collapsible eye cups...
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]