Trad Gang
Main Boards => The Bowyer's Bench => Topic started by: Honest Jon on January 03, 2025, 05:51:41 PM
-
When tillering a bow (selfbow in my case), what do you use as the fulcrum point in the handle section of the bow. I lower the center point of the handle about 1-1.5 inches below the center point of the overall bow length. Should the tillering rope pull directly down from the center of the established handle, the center of the bow length ....or somewhere else.
Jon
-
I usually put my hook on the string and inch or two above center, approximately where the arrow nock is going to sit. That said, I've tillered bows from the center of the handle, and they worked out OK, so it probably isn't worth worrying about too much. Just makes a little more sense to me to put it where the arrow is going to be.
-
I start the tiller centered on the handle and middle if the string so pressures are balance to start an even bend. Once I get to about 6” shoot full draw I shift to center of the handle for a pressure point and there I intend my middle finger to be when drawing an arrow. The last couple inches I tiller in hand infront of a camera to see how it acts when drawn by hand.the last one you can do by feel and not need a camera but the camera makes it easier.
Kyle
-
On my bows, the center of the handle is the center of the bow and I center the handle on the tiller tree. When I get near full draw I make sure the bottom limb is slightly stiffer than the top limb.
-
what do you use as the fulcrum point in the handle section of the bow.
not anything that has so much contact that the bow cannot be free to tip side to side and not anything so pointy that the bow is hard to keep from tipping erratically
a soft leather or cork pad about an inch wide? (placement as per mo-coons advice)
I also have a small loop of string a couple of inches long that I can hitch to the tillering string that serves as a place to hook my pullrope. the hitched loop can slide on the tiller string with effort, but does not move without effort.
-
His picture shows well how I attach the bow to the tree. I use a loop of rope and a caribiner to clip to the scale.
Kyle
-
That's a good, non-static method, Kyle but the true view of the full draw tiller is on a hand held bow. That is a reason most of us like to see the back profile, the unbraced, the braced and the full draw hand held pics. The way the shooter holds the bow at full draw is the true picture of the full drawn bow...for that shooter.
-
His picture shows well how I attach the bow to the tree. I use a loop of rope and a caribiner to clip to the scale.
Kyle
Interesting setup, Kyle. It's almost the opposite of mine, which supports the bow with a wooden stand underneath and has the scale on the pull rope. I might like your way better. You have me thinking...
-
After using both ways there are a couple distinctions. With the fixed scale you have to accommodate the scales movement into the draw length. Which is why I can slide and move the yard stick. Lower poundage scales move more for the same draw weight but the heavier scales are harder to fine tune your poundage. Once the bow is hooked up to the scale I pull the bow itself to my intended poundage and see where the back of the bow ends up and move the yard stick there. But the scale is always in one spot for easy reference and if the bow snaps the scale doesn’t go flying to the ground.
Kyle
-
I don't mess with self bows much, but here is a couple photos of my tiller tree. i mounted the bow mount section on the wall with 6 heavy duty wood screws. Then i have pieces of rubber that are flat or rounded . I typically tiller my limbs before the riser block is shaped. like this
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
but i use the rounded piece for shaped risers.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
When i built my tiller tree it was years ago when i was doing a lot of prototype work and running DFC charts on the different designs. So i kind of went off the deep end here and built a section below the bow mount with a track and put a light in it... if you look real close you can see the holes in the black plastic that are spaced exactly 1 inch apart. There is another hole in the string hook block that the light shines through as you crank the bow down . that hook is shaped like fingers would hold the string.
here is the whole set up.
[ You are not allowed to view attachments ] [ You are not allowed to view attachments ] [ You are not allowed to view attachments ] [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
I mounted a boat wench on a wood pedestal and use a pulley at the bottom. I can use this with tje bracket hook, or just clip it to the string with a carbiner.
-
You can dynamically balance a bow quite well with the bow set solid and level by whatever means, then place the hook on the string where the center of your string hand fulcrum would be. For me, it's just below the middle of my middle finger.
That precise spot can be found with a few measurements taken from the edge of the bow cradle/handle/shelf location to locate the nock on the string(I set my arrow 1/8" above perpendicular to the shelf), then from there measure the thickness of the arrow nock, half the width of your middle finger, or whatever your deal is. Take your time and make sure this is all as accurate as possible. Then at that spot, your actual string fulcrum, draw a vertical plumb line on the wall under the tree to articulate perfect fulcrum travel straight down the wall.
If a bow's limbs are balanced relative to your hold on the string, the hook will follow the line down the wall exactly. If one limb is acting stronger than the other, relative to your hold, the hook will drift toward the stronger limb. It's easy to see just a tiny imbalance. Weaken it until the hook follows the line. When the hook follows the line to full draw, you're done. Balanced bow. You'll love how it shoots.
If you want to find exactly where the bow hand fulcrum is or attempt to move it one way or the other, you can set the bow up to pivot at the handle. I have this capability, and like to play with it, but honestly it's not necessary. The above method works great and makes for a fine shooting bow every time.
I've never tillered a bow by drawing from the center of the handle or center of the bow because it never made sense to me to tiller the bow while drawing the string from one spot, only to shoot it while drawing it from somewhere else.
-
Hey Bowjunkie good to see you chime in:) Its a strange beast to tame but I have always been intrigued by your method- Last order of business in my shop is to set up a new tiller tree- Based on the photo would you support the grip with a 2 3/4" flat spot?
-
I haven't done it that way but assume it would work fine. Since your static point of balance(bow center) and dynamic point of balance/fulcrum under the bow hand will both be within that 2-3/4" area the entire time, the bow should sit still on the tree while you tiller and balance limb strength.
If you understand that, and the line/balance method, hopefully you can see how it wouldn't matter if you supported that flat grip with a 2-3/4" flat cradle or a full 4" flat cradle to hold it. You're going to get the same feedback from the bow and tillering tree, and get the same final result in limb balance.
Make sure your handle area(not necessarily bow tips) is level in the tree cradle, your string fulcrum location accurately represents the center of your pressure on the string, and the line on the wall that represents its perpendicular movement down and away from the handle is plumb. Good to go.
-
Interesting. You guys have me rethinking my whole way of doing this...
-
The few times I’ve used a fixed bow mount on the tiller tree I’ve done the same as bowjunkie and it works quite well. I still like to finish the tillering with a video in the hand since you can change the balance with different hand pressure and different grip shapes can change how and where you apply pressure. Your generally just a few scrapes shift at this point vs in the tree. It’s not a lot and it won’t make a difference in the durability of the bow but does make a just noticeable difference in feel.
Kyle
-
Thanks Bowjunkie, makes sense on the grip contact area.
Moon-catcher, slo mo videos are a great tool to witness what the eye cant:)
-
Slow Mo videos are fun to watch. I wish I could pull an old video off my Facebook page to save into my phone again. By I have one from several years ago of a mikmak style double bow that jiggles like crazy when shot but feels pretty smooth and fast when shot.
Kyle
-
Bowjunkie was my mentor and I tiller just like he explained. The bows always shoot so smooth and quiet that way..
-
..... Then at that spot, your actual string fulcrum, draw a vertical plumb line on the wall under the tree to articulate perfect fulcrum travel straight down the wall.
should the pulley at the floor be aligned with this drawn line?
-
Yes.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXf3d24GsYA
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf7CnshkW7I
-
Yes.
thanks Roy, so unless your pulley and line is easily movable, "find the string fulcrum and draw a line" could be better stated as "adjust the seating of the bow handle such that the string fulcrum is directly above the line and pully" ?
-
Yes, my lower pulley is adjustable. I just slide it left or right then lock it down.
-
Yes, my lower pulley is adjustable. I just slide it left or right then lock it down.
is it neccesary that the bow sits perpendicular to the line?
-
Yes, level the handle first.
-
"so unless your pulley and line is easily movable, "find the string fulcrum and draw a line" could be better stated as "adjust the seating of the bow handle such that the string fulcrum is directly above the line and pully"
Yes, that would work just as well.
I have a lower pulley set up like Roy's, except mine has four pullies on it, so I can draw the bow as a split finger shooter or 3 under shooter, whether the top limb is facing right or left, all without moving a pulley. Being able to flip the bow around helps to verify that you have your tree setup properly as well as verify what the bow is doing, what you're seeing, and deal with some natural selfbow stave irregularities. With multiple pullies, I can change string position in 2 seconds.
-
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0BTNCY4DC/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=A3DDYVJT6VP8R&th=1https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00AKC3BTA/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?smid=A16NVWA9G6RLXM&psc=1
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B09JS83DDT/ref=ox_sc_act_title_3?smid=AR88GRBHPCMHU&th=1
Bowjunkie and Roy- This is how I plan to set my tree up. Comments?
-
Just saw your picture roy :)
-
Awesome:)
I ground a thin 2 inch flat spot on the lower pulley shaft so I could slide the pulley where I wanted it, then lock it down with the set screw..
-
Geeze Stag, 1"? That's heavy duty. I think mine is just 1/2". But there's no reason 1" wouldn't work. Just make sure you can get pulleys to fit it.
-
Im building 400lb bows :) I can size it down but there are very little to no savings in components :goldtooth:
-
Thanks Roy!
-
Maybe Ill get another pulley for 3 under-Gosh Im not smitten with 3-under:)
-
4x8 sheet of drywall against backdrop- Helps with looking at limb bend:)
-
As the original poster of this thread I want to thank all of you for your input! It sure helped me and expect it will help others too.
Honest Jon
-
400 pound bow huh?
Ya need me to come down and shoot it in for ya?:)
-
The trip down might hurt ya, Ill bring it up:)
-
400# bows?? Foot bows, crossbows or what?
-
Tongue in cheek Onetone-Got ribbed from bowjunkie about how beefy my tiller tree set up was :biglaugh:
-
LOL, why did you buy a 1 inch shaft anyways?:)
-
Hehe. Thanks. I missed that …
-
Same price as 1/2 “ and got it same day:) even the pillow blocks were the same.
-
I’m a little late to the party but might as well throw in my 2 cents. My current rack has a slightly curved rest for the bow to sit on and I usually pull from wherever the balance point is. My previous rack had a strap rest similar to Mocoon’s. The nice thing with that is that you get instant feedback on which limb is stronger.
However, I’m a big believer in finishing tillering (the last couple inches) by drawing in hand and photographing it. There are aspects that you can’t see necessarily but you can feel and I find that helpful.
-
I have that too. I made inserts that fit down in the cradle of the tillering tree that are shaped flat and others of various curves. I also have a short piece of a half-round file that I can place anywhere on the cradle to reveal the balance point, or allow the bow limbs to be balanced relative to that fulcrum point... to an extent, i.e. there's only so much we can do when it comes to moving the fulcrum under the bow hand because of bow design and geometry.
BUT, I've found those inserts almost entirely unnecessary. When I balance bows as described earlier, they balance perfectly during and up to full draw, and shoot an arrow dead straight away from the nock point location on the string that I originally intended, from the very first arrow.
When the bow is done on the tree, it's dynamically balanced, it feels finely balanced in the hand each and every time, no additional adjustment/tuning/corrections needed. The pictures I've taken at full draw revealed that balance. All I have to concern myself with after the bow is done is arrow spine. Work moves straightforward toward that first arrow launched, no backtracking, no guesswork, bows are inherently tuned. Nothing to fix, no discrepancies to try to overcome by moving nock point location, etc. This is the main benefit to tillering with focus on dynamic balance... it's the quickest & easiest, consistently reliable way to a balanced bow that I've found.
-
Bowjunkie Ive seen you post the nock height that you tiller at before...... 1/8" above 90Deg and nock above? This has always puzzled me since my knock point is higher :bigsmyl:
-
Bowjunkie Ive seen you post the nock height that you tiller at before...... 1/8" above 90Deg and nock above? This has always puzzled me since my knock point is higher :bigsmyl:
Your exact arrow knock location will vary from one archer to the next depending on where the pressure is applied to the grip, and your finger placement on the string. Balancing the limbs has a huge effect on hand shock and overall performance of the bow, but string knock location and arrow flight is dependent on set up.
With that being said…. There is a huge difference between tillering a self bow, and tillering a composite backed bow.
-
Stag, just to be clear, when I say that, I mean the back end of the arrow is raised 1/8" above perpendicular, and that would be measuring from the shelf to the bottom of the arrow nock(not the nocking point on the string). Assuming the arrow nock is 1/4" thick, which mine are, the bottom edge of the actual nocking point on the string is then 3/8" above perpendicular to the shelf.
Ultimately the arrow may be a wee bit less than 1/8 above perpendicular when everything is considered... arrow taper, arrow diameter vs arrow nock thickness, etc, but I'm fine with that.
Kirk, I balance limb strength in glass bows the same way I do with wooden bows. Due to the materials used, there's a difference between selfbows and glass bows in construction methods when it comes to 'tillering' the limbs for even flex or the curve wanted, but the physics is the same, and my practice in achieving dynamic balance is the same. I balance glass bows the same way as selfbows, boo backed, sinew backed, all of em. All nock points are set at the same place, then I balance the limbs as closely as I can relative to the archer. I mostly make bows for myself, but when I've made them for others, I collect as much pertinent info about their shooting idioms as possible and design and build the bow accordingly, and they've remarked on the shooting characteristics that come with such balance and appreciated not having to make adjustments to nock point height. There should be no need for that if we collaborated well and I do my part.
-
Stag, just to be clear, when I say that, I mean the back end of the arrow is raised 1/8" above perpendicular, and that would be measuring from the shelf to the bottom of the arrow nock(not the nocking point on the string). Assuming the arrow nock is 1/4" thick, which mine are, the bottom edge of the actual nocking point on the string is then 3/8" above perpendicular to the shelf.
Ultimately the arrow may be a wee bit less than 1/8 above perpendicular when everything is considered... arrow taper, arrow diameter vs arrow nock thickness, etc, but I'm fine with that.
Kirk, I balance limb strength in glass bows the same way I do with wooden bows. Due to the materials used, there's a difference between selfbows and glass bows in construction methods when it comes to 'tillering' the limbs for even flex or the curve wanted, but the physics is the same, and my practice in achieving dynamic balance is the same. I balance glass bows the same way as selfbows, boo backed, sinew backed, all of em. All nock points are set at the same place, then I balance the limbs as closely as I can relative to the archer. I mostly make bows for myself, but when I've made them for others, I collect as much pertinent info about their shooting idioms as possible and design and build the bow accordingly, and they've remarked on the shooting characteristics that come with such balance and appreciated not having to make adjustments to nock point height. There should be no need for that if we collaborated well and I do my part.
You are absolutely right about limb balance and the "tiller" being the same with self bows and glass bows. Only the tillering process is dramatically different. Most of your bow tiller adjustments in a composite bow is determined by your taper rates and wedge configurations in the limbs, and controlled by consistency in mill work and laying them up the same without anything shifting in the core. If everything is accurate, and your limb width profiles are the same, it's just a matter of sanding glass to balance things out, and maybe a little limb trapping.......
But.... i'd be willing to bet that 90% of the bowyers out there don't actually "tiller" a composite bow at all... they sand the glass to an even "Tiller Measurement" or 1/8" positive for 3 under, and just call it good.... There is a difference between adjusting the limbs to a set tiller measurement, and actually tillering the bow and balancing the limbs.
Now if something shifts slightly during lay up, things can get a bit more interesting trying to get things balanced and have the limbs bending the same. Kirk
-
But.... i'd be willing to bet that 90% of the bowyers out there don't actually "tiller" a composite bow at all... they sand the glass to an even "Tiller Measurement" or 1/8" positive for 3 under, and just call it good.... There is a difference between adjusting the limbs to a set tiller measurement, and actually tillering the bow and balancing the limbs.
Exactly, Kirk...
-
I agree that's what many do, set the brace height according to conventional 'wisdom', like 1/4" positive for split finger is a common practice... with many selfbow makers too unfortunately. It makes it quicker and easier for the bowyer... but doesn't result in the best bow.
-
I agree that's what many do, set the brace height according to conventional 'wisdom', like 1/4" positive for split finger is a common practice... with many selfbow makers too unfortunately. It makes it quicker and easier for the bowyer... but doesn't result in the best bow.
I’m curious where you came up with 1/4” positive tiller measurements is common practice for a split finger shooting application? You called that “conventional wisdom” ? Or was that tongue in cheek?
Btw…. There is a big difference between a seasoned bowyer, and someone that has just built a lot of bows. The season self bowyers that learn to manipulate natural materials and get longevity from their creations are what I would consider the masters in this trade. They understand how these things work a lot better than most glass bowyers do….. But…. It’s just too much heart break for me to indulge that much time and energy into myself. My hat is off to you masters out there.
Kirk
-
Yes, tongue in cheek. I call it conventional wisdom not because it's correct, it's not, no single predetermined tiller measurement is, but rather because it's indeed what many folks advocate. Bottom limb 1/8 to 1/4 stronger than the top at brace for split finger, with no other qualifiers or considerations. It's really crappy advice.
-
That's what i thought... Judging from your posts on other topics it seems to me like you have a pretty good feel for this stuff. its a real shame there is so much speculation, philosophy, and down right bogus info being spread on the internet.
But ......there are a lot of bowyers that truely want to build a better product out there. But how many of them that are willing to take the time and effort to actually do it are few and far between. It takes experience to get there. The knowledge i've accumulated has taken many years building a lot of different limb designs and documenting test results, materials used, and detailed lay up data in my log book. If i can share a few tips here and there to get the new bowyers off on the right track, i'm all in... Kirk
-
Still learning from this thread. This morning I put a selfbow on the rack and was concerned about funky horizontal torque. So, I cut an 11/16” arrow shaft to length, flattened on one side and stuck it over the “saddle”. Really free floating. [ You are not allowed to view attachments ] [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]
-
Wrap that baby with duct tape or leather and you wont scratch finished bows A 1 1/4" closet poll rod works well too with a flat spot.
-
That baby’s wrapped in oil tan leather.
-
That baby’s wrapped in oil tan leather.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
-
Bowjunkie thanks for responding. I guess with your tillering method you can choose the location of the nock point in advance of tillering- typically mine are 3/8 from center and I nock above- once I finish my tiller tree I might try a lower nock point. Btw you were right a 1” rod is too big and doesn’t fit the 1” blocks or pulley. I have to get it milled or find one a few thousands smaller :bigsmyl:
-
There are a ton of 1/2" rods on the market..
-
First time using pillow blocks and pulley- no issues using a 1/2 “ rod in a 1” hole?
-
:biglaugh: :laughing: :bigsmyl:
-
Set screws too short to secure pulley to bar 7/8 will work :goldtooth:
-
Why are you guys messing with pillow blocks anyway? a simple pully works just fine.
https://www.amazon.com/Pullies-Loading-Material-Handling-Project/dp/B09XDLWH2S/ref=sr_1_9?crid=W0EN5VGW0RZ6&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.Iny1n07ZrBEykCvTqwGFMmsp5qftMSeupZJoyJfXNh8Px1bDQ8N8ITCGvr6bkAd3cdwboSzNG5PV9dHFCBIt8I6wSvWpUepGshMaooXlOGjGOHpTBQy7vBFONPYPNybaulz1vTmrSs0Nz0itb8enntEsuB7_Smfqk3IZajqO9mtAYsEVRwHmakLJn8RKA2WumdFJdygQq1tuh-_pY0ZAxm5ZdUwSMjmKciu2un6HPjw.2R_86FLaOZerRhH1sKxuk9SxBx5NZ-aZj8L5GWz64Lo&dib_tag=se&keywords=pulleys&qid=1738434088&sprefix=pulleys%2Caps%2C177&sr=8-9&th=1
https://www.amazon.com/SHINICO-Stainless-Bearing-Equipment-Clothesline/dp/B092TC62BW/ref=sr_1_8?crid=W0EN5VGW0RZ6&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.Iny1n07ZrBEykCvTqwGFMmsp5qftMSeupZJoyJfXNh8Px1bDQ8N8ITCGvr6bkAd3cdwboSzNG5PV9dHFCBIt8I6wSvWpUepGshMaooXlOGjGOHpTBQy7vBFONPYPNybaulz1vTmrSs0Nz0itb8enntEsuB7_Smfqk3IZajqO9mtAYsEVRwHmakLJn8RKA2WumdFJdygQq1tuh-_pY0ZAxm5ZdUwSMjmKciu2un6HPjw.2R_86FLaOZerRhH1sKxuk9SxBx5NZ-aZj8L5GWz64Lo&dib_tag=se&keywords=pulleys&qid=1738434088&sprefix=pulleys%2Caps%2C177&sr=8-8&th=1
-
Because I want to easily and accurately move the pulley left and right to adjust string line travel for different tillers. Did you read any of Bowjunkies and Roy’s posts on their tiller tree setup?
-
Kirk, we wood bow guys are higher tech than those damn glass bow guys:) :biglaugh:
-
I get your drift guys..(Pun intended). I simply shift the bow one way or the other where it sets on the top for that, and center up the deepest part of the grip for tiller adjustments...
But.... i suppose that doesn't apply to guys that are heeling down on their flat shaped bow grips and gripping the the bow hard enough to choke a chicken with a bent arm so it doesn't rattle their teeth loose shooting it.
But you are right... You self bowyers are the masters...
-
:biglaugh: :laughing: :thumbsup:
-
Bowjunkie I’m playing around with your tiller method and it looks like I would have to negatively tiller my bows to get straight line travel which I’ve never seen done before.
Question ? Regardless of the fulcrum point established by the fingers at full draw at the moment of release and when the string stops released isn’t a “vee” formed in the string and all pressure shifts straight through the nock?
-
Negative tiller never hurt anything.
When tillering for equal limb timing, the tiller is just whatever it is when limbs are balanced.
-
My very first glueup i mixed up a lam stack from one set of plans with the curves of another set and was never able to get a string on it. I just started messing around with it this year after years of it sitting and staring at me had to narrow the limbs quite a bit to get it down to 60 pounds and in doing so i developed a half inch of negative tiller. These limbs are scary narrow from 1 inch at the fades to 3/8ths nocks and tracking perfectly down the center of the limbs. That all said i decided to shoot it quite a bit before moving forward and its really extreme but this 1/2" negative tiller has reliably cast the flattest arrow trajectory on a range of different weight and spined arrows. This is just anecdotal and wasnt on purpose but it has gotten me thinking.
-
My very first glueup i mixed up a lam stack from one set of plans with the curves of another set and was never able to get a string on it. I just started messing around with it this year after years of it sitting and staring at me had to narrow the limbs quite a bit to get it down to 60 pounds and in doing so i developed a half inch of negative tiller. These limbs are scary narrow from 1 inch at the fades to 3/8ths nocks and tracking perfectly down the center of the limbs. That all said i decided to shoot it quite a bit before moving forward and its really extreme but this 1/2" negative tiller has reliably cast the flattest arrow trajectory on a range of different weight and spined arrows. This is just anecdotal and wasnt on purpose but it has gotten me thinking.
Those ones that come in real heavy and are trimmed down skinny as a whip will always be fast. As far as tiller goes….
1/2” difference in tiller measurement says nothing of the limbs actually being tillered. Have you mapped the limbs to see if they are bending in the same spots?
-
Havent mapped them i did tiller for even tip bend at full draw. didnt have my tiller tree up so i used a tillering stick that i occasioanlly use for selfbows with a rounded top where the grip sits. mounted on a vice and sighted against my shop walls using the building legs to eyeball the tillering stick plumb and with the string set in the 28" groove the tips lined up on the same lip of siding. Again i havent finished the bow and i know its properly aside from common standards. It just amazed me that its throwing these lasers, and it is quite fast, im going to tinker with trying to purposely build this same skinny bow a few times and see what sort of stack height differences turn up from its 'original" cousin bows that come off this form.
-
Excellent! I’d much rather have a deeper core narrow limbs than a wider ones. But I still have a tendency to leave the tips an 1/8” wide for tip notch adjustment for tracking. Then narrow them up as I do the tip overlays.
Most guys building recurves build them much wider than they need to be, thinking it’s needed for stability. Kirk
-
I hear ya Roy! Guess I’m going to tiller a bow like that and see what happens. I still don’t understand why nock travel wouldn’t be calculated at the nock since all pressure in the string ends up there after the release and the end of the power stroke- anyone want to chime in is welcome:)
-
We aren't talking about nock travel, we are balancing the bow limbs per where we grip the string.
-
Wouldn't it a proper assumption that if you get a bow properly tillered that the result would be better nock travel?
-
I get it Roy it was a misnomer- fulcrum travel(finger pressure) not nock travel.
What I’m struggling to understand is this. At the moment of release all pressure shifts from wherever the pressure is initially exerted in the string to the “nock”.
So what is the significance of straight line travel at the fulcrum point?
-
https://youtu.be/0JCV33eocyY?si=yVs3V20wqUcX2hvD
I tried to convince myself the string does more than go flat to new string angle at the nock as your fingers release but this slow mo vid points to what stag is saying
-
So what is the significance of straight line travel at the fulcrum point?
I honestly don't believe there is any significance. The limbs timing, tiller, and balance as that string comes comes forward back to brace height, and what happens to those limbs after Elvis has left the building is more significant.
-
I get it Stag. I get caught up in the fine details as well. I would think the only way to get it down to the knats behind would be to use a D-loop and a release to shoot with. As long as you are shooting with fingers, 3 under/split or whatever, there is going to be inconsistancies from one shot to the next. Since everyone grabs the string in a different place because of their style of hook or the thickness of ones fingers, you have to choose somewhere to tiller from.
Maybe you can tiller some from the arrow nock and some from the finger fulcrum and see which methed produces the best and most consistant results.
I personally have always tillered to brace measurements and on occasian mapped a set of limbs, but never as Bowjunkie has described. This is the way I was told to do it when I learned a few years ago.
Trying this way of tillering on the next one.
-
So what is the significance of straight line travel at the fulcrum point?
That indicates the limbs are bending in sync.
Quiet smooth shooting bow.
-
Roy, since I have my tree set up Im going to give it a shot :bigsmyl:
I think it would be easier with equal limbed bows compared to mine that are 1.5 shorter lower limb. Typically they are 1/4" positive when first strung. Thats a ton of work to get the limb to go in the opposite direction :)
-
I'm really interested to see how this turns out Stag. If the purpose and function of tillering from the fulcrum is to indicate a synchronous draw then regardless of the tiller measurement at the fades it would be a smooth shooter and the limbs balanced if all holds true.
This is also provided you don't have a grip on the bow that will affect which limb gets more bend. I saw a photo in one of G.Fred Asbell books where the grip position was changed between two photos of the same bow and in one of the photos the lower limb bends about a 1/3rd more from hand placement.
-
This is also provided you don't have a grip on the bow that will affect which limb gets more bend. I saw a photo in one of G.Fred Asbell books where the grip position was changed between two photos of the same bow and in one of the photos the lower limb bends about a 1/3rd more from hand placement.
Modify message
That is possible on any bow, changing from a high to low grip changes the torque applied to either top or lower limb.