Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: PastorSteveHill on July 26, 2009, 05:14:00 PM

Title: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: PastorSteveHill on July 26, 2009, 05:14:00 PM
Wondering what the verdict is on the new WW elite broadheads?  I have read the post, some don't like because they whistle.  

How true do they spin?

How hard are they to sharpen/ as opposed to the original woodsmans?  Some thought they were hard to sharpen also...  

Thank you in advance...
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: flyfish1 on July 26, 2009, 08:00:00 PM
I think they are made well but havent shot them yet. They are smaller than I like and will stick with snuffers or at times the originals. Like lazer ray said ,the originals are fine for me.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: PastorSteveHill on July 26, 2009, 08:44:00 PM
Looking to shoot a 3 blade 150 gr. head.. these seem to fit the bill. Plus they should be tuff, no? Being made of a single piece of steel, that sounds good to me...
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: SteveMcD on July 26, 2009, 08:45:00 PM
I haven't yet finished my arrows yet. But the "Elite" is one cool Broadhaed. As stated on the package,   :thumbsup:  they come "factory" sharp, but with some additional sharpening and honing. They are easy to sharpen. I think the size and one piece construction make for one nasty broadhead. I can hardly wait to test them out and hunt with them. So far, I am impressed.   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: fountain on July 26, 2009, 09:30:00 PM
i have seen a lot of them pop up for sale for them to be so new and so great--they got me wondering.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: PastorSteveHill on July 26, 2009, 09:49:00 PM
last two post... Good points on each side... Anybody use them yet?
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: SlowBowinMO on July 26, 2009, 09:58:00 PM
I have been testing some, the screw in version, and I am mighty impressed.  Mine do hiss loudly, which bothers some people, others could care less but it is the ONLY potential draw back on them I can find.  Super strong, very high quality and excellent grind, fly laser straight man do they get sharp.

I'll be messing with some glue ons next, I believe they are worth checking out.  I'm curious to see if the differences in the ferrules has any bearing on the hissing.  I also want to further experiment and determine if arrow set up has any effect on noise.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: PastorSteveHill on July 26, 2009, 10:43:00 PM
Slowbow, please post your results.  Thanks

Steve
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: jonsimoneau on July 26, 2009, 10:45:00 PM
In my opinion, it is the best 3 blade head you can get.  I have not seen the elite in person, but I bet it is good.  I had a couple of batches of the old ones recently that were not so good, and could have sent them back to 3 rivers but chose not to.  3 rivers has always been very good to me. And when you are changing things, a few errors are bound to happen.  I'm sure they will prove to be an excellent head.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: arrow flynn on August 05, 2009, 01:45:00 AM
arn,t they just a longer version of a snuffer/
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Steelhead on August 05, 2009, 03:16:00 AM
Nope
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: vtmtnman on August 05, 2009, 05:08:00 AM
I find it hard to believe the old ones didn't whistle.I've shot a few vented BH's to try them out and they all whistled.Whistling is the nature of the beast.Just have to live with it.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: d. ward on August 05, 2009, 06:32:00 AM
I got a WWE off Uncle Barry in Que'bec this spring and I did not get it to shoot.I wanted to check how well there made ??? Machined from a solid block with no welds or weak links.I gotta tell you guy's that one heck of a strong broadhead.
If you shoot a broadhead with vent holes and your arrow is spining I believe those two factors could cause a whistling sound with any broadhead.bd   (http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii175/bowdocsarchery/ww1001.jpg)
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Benny Nganabbarru on August 05, 2009, 06:33:00 AM
None of mine, old or new, have ever whistled.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: James Wrenn on August 05, 2009, 07:46:00 AM
I was excited when it came out untill I saw they had downsized it.Just too small for my needs now.I always considered the original a small head.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: DanDaMan on August 05, 2009, 07:58:00 AM
I myself love them.  They will be on my arrows for elk, deer, and speed goats.  I have not seen any noise when I have shot them.  They fly like darts.  Look to be as tough as nails.  There is absolutely no weak spots on the head.  I am able to get them spooky sharp in a short time and with little effort.  As far as the size, yes they are just a tad shorter than the original, but I really dont think that will be an issue.  It is still long and I feel that it will not be hampered at all at being .4 of an inch shorter than the original.  
Dan
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Don Stokes on August 05, 2009, 09:50:00 AM
Now if they will just make a glue-on heavier than 125...
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Jason Jelinek on August 05, 2009, 10:08:00 AM
Don, you can use the Woody weights to bump up the weight of the 125 glue-ons.  They (woody weights) fit tight and seem very strong.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: martin guy on August 05, 2009, 02:02:00 PM
Don,

check out the internal point wt. system from Braveheart or 3Rivers, adds wt. and strength.
Ben Klenig has just done a review on it, should be on the main page of Pow Wow.

Andy
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Don Stokes on August 05, 2009, 04:08:00 PM
Thanks guys, but I'm a firm believer in Murphy's Law, and I only want a straight glue-on. Until they make them heavier, I'll stick with my Snuffers. The attractive thing to me about the WW's is the better length/width ratio than the Snuffers, but I'm not willing to give up the weight, or use adapters to get where I already am with the Snuffers. My FOC with the 160's on my barreled shafts is about 17%, which is plenty enough to suit me.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: J-KID on August 05, 2009, 04:55:00 PM
I've been shooting three of them for a month now and I will be hunting with them this season.  I do not hear any hissing or whistling sounds and they fly as good as any broadhead I've ever shot.  I'm impressed with the quality.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Gary Logsdon on August 06, 2009, 12:11:00 AM
OK, here goes, I finallly got a hold of a 3-pack of glue ons.  Stuck a 100 gr. steel insert in one which bumped the head up to 225 gr, so with a 100 gr brass HIT insert I have 325 grs up front and a pretty good FOC. setup. The arrows check spin perfectly and are tuned to the bow.  I get no sound from the head, period.  Flies like a dart.  As far as sharpening, they weren't ready to hunt with out of the package, however a minute on a flat DMT diamond hone took care of that.  Well-built head.  The only criticism I have is the width which is a bit narrow; the "Elite" is barely legal in KY . . . I mean by a hair!  If a guy gets too file happy he would be putting an illegal broadhead in his quiver here.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Boomerang on August 06, 2009, 10:31:00 AM
"The only criticism I have is the width which is a bit narrow; the "Elite" is barely legal in KY . . . I mean by a hair! If a guy gets too file happy he would be putting an illegal broadhead in his quiver here."

You have to measure diameter. Not the distance across two of the blades. The cutting diameter is 1".
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: SlowBowinMO on August 06, 2009, 10:50:00 AM
I've already given the screw ins a hard look, but got some glue ons in yesterday to test.  I immediately noticed the vents are significantly smaller on the glue on due to the ferrule.  I can't help but wonder if the conflicting reports regarding hiss is a result of Glue on versus screw in head differences.

In my testing thus far arrow set ups seem make a difference too...
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Terry Green on August 06, 2009, 11:14:00 AM
The are very well made....and spin true....I REALLY like the construction.  The come pretty dang sharp....and only a few licks on a diamond stick and they are razor ready.

Like stated above...I just wish they were the same exact specs as the originals.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Gary Logsdon on August 06, 2009, 04:54:00 PM
Sorry to disagree with you on this one Jeff, but that's not how KY has written or apparently interprets it's regulation. I have thoroughly checked this out before posting here. One of my best clients is a veteran KDFW conservation officer from central KY and one of my cousins is the state biologist in charge of the KY elk restoration project. Two men definitely on "the inside" in Frankfort!. A few months ago I gave the broadhead reg. question to both of them to obtain a definitive interpretation . . . and got one.  KY measures "edge-to-edge broadhead width", not the "cutting diameter" (Like Alaska and some other states.  I explained to them that some states consider the "hole" diameter, or what you obtain when you draw a circle with a compass by connecting the outside edges of a three blade head, IOW, "cutting diameter".  Both men agreed that if the current reg. was ever rewritten then it should be changed, BUT, that's not in effect now, so I guess the "outdated" reg. trumps common sense right now, and that equals a citation in 2009 IF those edges don't measure at least 7/8" apart.  SO, the Ws Elites I measured, directly from the package, are barely legal under the present interpretation of the KY regulation. As a prudent person I'm concerned about what might happen if my quiver is ever checked by a local CO, and I'm paying attention to what they say!
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Gary Logsdon on August 06, 2009, 05:06:00 PM
Forgot to mention that one of the COs told me that "ground hole gages were too costly in today's economy" so the reg may take years to be rewritten":^(  So, be happy that they are legal now . . . although KY guys need to watch the filing.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Gary Logsdon on August 06, 2009, 05:37:00 PM
Here's what causes some of the confusion guys.  If in doubt about how things are interpreted by COs in your area, do like I did and talk to several before going afield.  Here are two quotes; the first is posted (verbatim) from the Alaskan bowhunting reg. sheet and the second from Kentucky's.  Notice the inclusion of the words "cutting diameter" in the first one, but not the next:

Alaska: "broadhead" means an arrowhead with two or more sharp cutting edges having a minimum cutting diameter of not less than seven-eighths inch (7/8").

Kentucky: "Legal Longbows, recurve bows, compound bows and crossbows (during crossbow season)
Broadheads at least 7/8” wide
Any draw weight (no minimum)

Illegal
Barbed broadheads
Broadheads smaller than 7/8” wide
Arrows with chemical treatments or attachments containing chemicals"

This will be my last post on this, just wanted to publish my findings.  I was a International Bowhunter Education Master Instructor back in the 80s and still have a thing for making sure guys keep alert and stay out of trouble:^):^)
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Widowbender on August 07, 2009, 09:46:00 AM
Good Post, Gary...
As they say "The devil's in the details"...

David
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Schultzy on August 07, 2009, 10:00:00 AM
My brother Is going to give the 125 Elites a try this fall. His whistle a tad too out of his longbow but so do my 160 grain glue on Snuffers.

I really like the construction of them, the solid one piece head Is awesome. The cutting diameter kind of disappointments me some though. But then again a person might get more of a hole then a slit with these broadheads, might be the cats meow too everyone. We'll see!
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: dino on August 07, 2009, 10:10:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Gary Logsdon:
Forgot to mention that one of the COs told me that "ground hole gages were too costly in today's economy" so the reg may take years to be rewritten":^(  So, be happy that they are legal now . . . although KY guys need to watch the filing.
Gary,
Not arguing with the law and some good info there to be aware of but to that CO's point  back to what Gene or Barry (can't remember which) put in an earlier post about this... take a 7/8" paddle bit and drill a hole in a piece of wood...if it drops thru it illegal if it doesn't it has to be larger than 7/8".  If they can't afford that guage, I don't know what then.  dino
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Paul WA on August 07, 2009, 11:52:00 AM
Havent tried them yet but sure like the old model glue on...PR
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Gary Logsdon on August 07, 2009, 06:32:00 PM
Dean, the COs said that in jest, and were simply making a joke about what might happen if the law was ever rewritten:^) The current KY law has nothing to do with "cutting diameter", only the "width" measured edge-to-edge.  If it's a 2 blade, then it's measured edge-to-edge and the same with a 3 blade. Now, in state such as AK the reg. reads "cutting diameter", so there are probably a lot of boat paddles to go around up there!  I wish I was wrong on this as I'd prefer they use "cutting diameter" as that's more indicative of what the 3 blade will do.  I was disappointed to find out how they wrote and interpret the law.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Terry Green on August 07, 2009, 07:14:00 PM
Gary....I'm sure there are wider versions coming....just hold on!
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: HATCHCHASER on August 18, 2009, 09:34:00 PM
You think the wider ones might be here by September?   :bigsmyl:
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Terry Green on August 19, 2009, 01:36:00 PM
Uh.........no comment   ;)
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Morning Star on August 19, 2009, 02:21:00 PM
Quote
Shape of things to come.
Man, looks like we're getting close to the perfect broadhead.  ;)
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: J-dog on August 19, 2009, 02:31:00 PM
No whistle there! looks good
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: flatlander37 on August 19, 2009, 03:00:00 PM
James, you gonna have them in a 250 grain screw in?
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: James Wrenn on August 19, 2009, 04:07:00 PM
They are not something I have anything to do with so am not sure when or what will be available.Just some prototypes someone sent me to try out since I made the comment about wishing they had stuck with the regular size as the original heads.I don't know when or IF they will marketed by 3 Rivers.I just know they will fit the bill for what some of us are looking for and wanted to what others thought of them.

These are original size 200gn heads but I think there is a wider vented version in the works that weighs 250gns.I have played with these a few days and like them.No noise at all and I have been shooting them with 2.5" feathers so they fly just like my feild points.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: jonsimoneau on August 19, 2009, 06:36:00 PM
THAT looks great! I hope they make them!
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Blasterjdh on August 20, 2009, 10:44:00 AM
:pray:    :pray:    :pray:
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Morning Star on August 20, 2009, 02:17:00 PM
Quote
These are original size 200gn heads  
Beautiful, they need to be in the catolog like....now.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Last of the Breed on August 20, 2009, 03:23:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by jonsimoneau:
THAT looks great! I hope they make them!
And soon!!!!!!
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: GregD on August 20, 2009, 09:45:00 PM
Is there any chance we might see theese this year?
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Terry Green on August 21, 2009, 07:41:00 AM
There are some heads still in the works....some are the Original specs of the ORIGINAL Woodsman, some vented, and some not,....some glue on and some screw one......lets see what they say when they are ready....So, what they look like are original Woodsmans....and then a screw on version.

This was stated by them earlier on another thread...so lets not steal their thunder....lets just cheer them on for their efforts...   :)
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: HATCHCHASER on August 21, 2009, 04:36:00 PM
:bigsmyl:
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: James Wrenn on August 21, 2009, 07:10:00 PM
Sorry guys.Did not know I was breaking rules when I posted the pictures.
Title: Re: Wensel Woodsman/ What is the Verdict?
Post by: Buckhorn47 on August 22, 2009, 08:17:00 AM
I have the new Elites - glue-on - used with wood.
High burn parabolic,RW, whistles. Pope & Young fletched RW, slight offset diagonal, no whistle. In both case fly exactly like field points. Using 40 and 50lb recurve and longbow, 50-55 spine wt.I like 'em and I'm a two-blade shooter.