Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: kennym on December 15, 2010, 07:33:00 PM

Title: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: kennym on December 15, 2010, 07:33:00 PM
Newspaper read today 104 #er killed in Carrol Co.,60 miles south of me.

Checked by MDC , they said definitely a yote,not a wolf.

Wolf in Grundy Co,35 miles NW of me a few years back killed by bowhunter weighed 80#

They also say most yote from 18 to 30 # in MO


What say ye?

I say if one of that stature comes by me,I'm puttin one in im!  :scared:  

Long walk to truck in dark with longbow and 104# yotes!!  :biglaugh:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Wannabe1 on December 15, 2010, 07:38:00 PM
What did he eat just before dying?!   :laughing:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: The Vanilla Gorilla on December 15, 2010, 07:42:00 PM
I saw that pic.  If they hadn't have dna tested it, I woulda laid odds that the hunter greased somebodys pet Husky.

When I trapped, a coyote of average size in my area would be around 20lbs.  I wonder what that pelt woulda fetched him!?

I bet when that yote threw his head back and howled, the rest shut up and laid down!

But, if it were me, I woulda held out for a big one.   Haha!
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: gorillabows on December 15, 2010, 07:42:00 PM
LOL.........I think that is great. I have to imagine that it should be a wolf, or even a bigger dog mixed with yote or siberian or something.

"Long walk to truck in dark with longbow and 104# yotes!! "

Yes it would be!!!
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: SEMO_HUNTER on December 15, 2010, 07:47:00 PM
I saw that this morning, my buddy sent me the link in an email.

It's a scientific fact that wolves and coyotes are very closely related and share the same DNA.
They will also interbreed and the offspring are called Timber wolves. The old timers used to call the coyote "The little brush wolf" or the "Little Timber Wolf" so if they both share the same DNA how can they say that it's not at least a hybrid coyote/wolf??

True coyotes just don't get that big without some help.....Yikes....Mega Yote!!
I think it's a hybrid and they just don't want to alarm the public.
There has been confirmed wolf sightings and even trail cam pics of them in Illinois......that's just across the river......so believe it or don't.....it's a hybrid.

My biggest coyote to date weighed 45lbs. and I can tell you that dude was plenty big! I dang sure wouldn't want one that size on me!
I just can't imagine how big a 108 pounder would look like up close? I would have shot that sonofa&%*$ too!

They also said the same thing about mountain lions in Missouri.....they routinely denied it everytime somebody spotted one.
Until one was captured on video camera carrying a deer carcass off. Now the MDC admits that we have a "Small" population of mountain lions.   :rolleyes:    "[dntthnk]"
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Friend on December 15, 2010, 07:49:00 PM
DNA tests have confirmed that a 104-pound canine shot by a hunter in Carroll County Nov. 13 was an unusually large coyote.

Information came from a Charlseton Gazette posting as of 18 hrs ago.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: on December 15, 2010, 07:51:00 PM
i wonder if theres a land fill near by?  :eek:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: koger on December 15, 2010, 07:53:00 PM
I have killed right at 100 yotes over the past 20 years, all rifle kills. Last 4 years have been my biggest, #35-40 dogs! I know some were crossed with husky's, collies etc., exact same markings. #40 is my biggest, weighed.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: SEMO_HUNTER on December 15, 2010, 07:57:00 PM
I don't care what they "Claim" that DNA testing has proved......that ain't no coyote like I have ever seen! Did you all notice the color on that "Coyote"???
I don't ever remember a coyote being grey/black/whitish silver around the muzzle??
I call BS on that thing being a coyote......even though MDC is one of the best conservation dept. in any state around, I guarantee that they aren't above fudging the truth to keep from alarming the public. After all......they Are a government agency.   :rolleyes:    :readit:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: bolong on December 15, 2010, 08:01:00 PM
I've killed some that might of went 60 or 65, didn't weigh them though. 104 is hard to beleive.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: on December 15, 2010, 08:02:00 PM
where can i see a picture at?
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: SEMO_HUNTER on December 15, 2010, 08:04:00 PM
Here's the link to MDC's report on it.
   http://mdc.mo.gov/newsroom/hunter-shoots-unusually-large-coyote-northwest-missouri  

Notice how they also mention that Wolves are "Protected" in the state of Missouri.
If we don't have any wolves, then why to they need protecting?
Hmmmmmm........that's kinda weird?     :rolleyes:  

Quote from article.....
"Wolves are a protected species in Missouri......."
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: wildgame on December 15, 2010, 08:10:00 PM
i would believe maybe a coy dog!the bigeast i ever seen was a 52pounder that had yote-chow mixed!
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: SEMO_HUNTER on December 15, 2010, 08:11:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by wildgame:
i would believe maybe a coy dog!the bigeast i ever seen was a 52pounder that had yote-chow mixed!
Boy...either the Yote decided to go "Up Town" or the Chow was slummin'??   :laughing:    :nono:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: on December 15, 2010, 08:12:00 PM
yeh, it doesent have the usual brown coleration that a coyote has...
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: $bowhunter$ on December 15, 2010, 08:14:00 PM
never seen a cyote look like that thats for sure
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: vtmtnman on December 15, 2010, 08:14:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SEMO_HUNTER:
Here's the link to MDC's report on it.
     http://mdc.mo.gov/newsroom/hunter-shoots-unusually-large-coyote-northwest-missouri    

Notice how they also mention that Wolves are "Protected" in the state of Missouri.
If we don't have any wolves, then why to they need protecting?
Hmmmmmm........that's kinda weird?       :rolleyes:    

Quote from article.....
"Wolves are a protected species in Missouri......."
That's along the same lines of there's no Catamounts in Vermont yet it says right in the game law book no open season on eastern mountain lion,lynx,or Marten.

Vermont and Missouri law makers must've drank the same kool aid..   :rolleyes:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Wannabe1 on December 15, 2010, 08:18:00 PM
Looks more like a wolf than a 'yote to me.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Hess on December 15, 2010, 08:20:00 PM
Poor Fido,

Somebody has lost there pet...I'm surprised there is no collar with tags on it.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: ishiwannabe on December 15, 2010, 08:23:00 PM
Looks like more husky than yote to me.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Bonebuster on December 15, 2010, 08:24:00 PM
I killed a 47 lb coyote in the winter of '05, I would have bet good money it was much heavier.

I can only imagine what a true 104 lb coyote would look like.

What we have when we find a 104 lb coyote, is evolution before our very eyes!
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: dragon rider on December 15, 2010, 08:26:00 PM
Man, it's been a while since I saw Catamount used for mountain lion.  Mountain lion, cougar, panther, puma all seem common but Catamount takes me back to the old Daniel Boone stories and such.

FWIW, that big dog looks like pure unadulterated coyote to me - just one who found himself a landfill or a bunch of dumpsters somewhere around.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: on December 15, 2010, 08:28:00 PM
you know how big a 100 lb deer is ,just think about that...
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: DannyBows on December 15, 2010, 08:29:00 PM
That one must have been hanging out near a Nuclear Power Plant! I'll bet he glows in the dark too.   :laughing:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: on December 15, 2010, 08:32:00 PM
there is one in missouri, and you can hunt around it......
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Mechslasher on December 15, 2010, 08:36:00 PM
as bonebuster said, evolution.  it is a rule in biology that "mother nature" hates vacuums and evolution is the tool she uses to fill it.  with the eradication of wolves, something will evolve to fill the void.  coyotes are the closest niche animal and over time you will see bigger and bigger yotes in the coming years.  you will also see a change in hunting behavior with yotes going after larger and larger game.  most likey forming more of a pack society to become more successful in hunting larger game.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: macksdad on December 15, 2010, 08:43:00 PM
That is a big coyote !!!
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: SEMO_HUNTER on December 15, 2010, 08:46:00 PM
Coyotes have already killed people in Canada and other places where they get huge, and are sharing the same strain of DNA that wolves have.
The Eastern coyotes like they have in NH, and Maine are very closely related to wolves.

I'm doing my part when I can.......I waged an all out war on coyotes here around my place about 4 years ago. I got tired of not seeing any rabbits, and when I read some articles about how big a part of a coyote's diet is newborn fawns.....that made me even more furious.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Friend on December 15, 2010, 09:02:00 PM
Possibly MO has a better coyote management program where most of the yotes harvested are above 1 1/2 years old.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: YORNOC on December 15, 2010, 09:03:00 PM
Coyotes are like bears, when somebody says they killed a 300 pounder it can often be closer to 200. Just like fishing, etc. Exaggeration often creeps in to make a good story better. I'm no biologist and I only know New England coyotes, and anything that hits 50 pounds would be a MONSTER around here.
A trapper friend in Maine shot(actually his wife shot) a 55 pound coyote. I saw it weighed with my own eyes and the thing was enormous, especially in its winter fur. In his whole life the next biggest he or his wife had ever taken was 42 and most were 20 to 35 pounds.
 If that coyote is legitimate, looks like maybe that gigantism condition like the wrestler Andre The Giant had? Or the 400# Hinkley whitetail from Maine....etc. etc,
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: swampmaster on December 15, 2010, 09:08:00 PM
thats funny semo
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: kennym on December 15, 2010, 09:23:00 PM
I think the weight is legit,but I'm having trouble with the species determination.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Dave Bowers on December 15, 2010, 09:33:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by wildgame:
i would believe maybe a coy dog!the bigeast i ever seen was a 52pounder that had yote-chow mixed!
Thats what i was thinking..coy dog.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: kennym on December 15, 2010, 09:38:00 PM
I just clicked on the pic and went to pic #2, no yote as far as I'm concerned. Think how long his legs are weighing 104, a coyote weighin in at 104 would be built more like me.......  :D
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: The Vanilla Gorilla on December 15, 2010, 09:40:00 PM
Chupacabra.

End of story.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Bjorn on December 15, 2010, 09:40:00 PM
That's as authentic as the 300 pound mountain lion killed last year! Or the 1100 pound wild boar for that matter.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: kennym on December 15, 2010, 09:41:00 PM
Authentic or not, that is what the MDC says, I haven't seen the critter.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: bgremill on December 15, 2010, 09:51:00 PM
I'm calling BS!
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Thumper Dunker on December 15, 2010, 09:56:00 PM
Thats no coyote thats a dog .And its not that old teeth are nice and white and they look too short to be a coyote or a wolf.Has a short muzle also, rounded ears . Feral dogie.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: on December 15, 2010, 10:00:00 PM
(http://i958.photobucket.com/albums/ae69/arrow30_photos/big_coyote_2.jpg)
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: vermonster13 on December 15, 2010, 10:01:00 PM
There is a 83# one stuffed in the state house here and they do run in packs here also. Black, grey, reddish colors are all common. Have Timber Wolf genes mixed in a lot of them.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Orion on December 15, 2010, 10:13:00 PM
I'm with Semo and a few others on this one.  That critter is a hybrid.  Doesn't even look like a coyote. I'm talking conformation more than color phase.   :readit:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: elkbreath on December 15, 2010, 10:19:00 PM
Thumper, thats what I'm thinking.  Every yote over 3 or so starts have some serious wear.  One old enough to reach this size would be ground down to the gums I would suppose.  Its legs are too long to, looks like a wolf to me, not a coyote. wouldn't be too incredible if a pup took off and ran down the Missouri river from Montana.  Stranger things have happened.  


of course, hes a small one.
    (http://bikesafe.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/big-bad-wolf.jpg)
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: bad arrow on December 15, 2010, 10:29:00 PM
His back end and legs have the coloration of a coyote but he sure looks wolflike in the front half and face....Phil
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: on December 15, 2010, 10:37:00 PM
wow!   how much did that guy weigh?
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Living_waters on December 15, 2010, 11:06:00 PM
I have a tanned yote shoulder mount in the deep frig that I havent found a form for yet. You can stick a basket ball inside the cape where the skull should be   ;)   . Like a dummy I didn't keep the jaw to match it up it was twice the size of a medium yote plastic jaw (that I had)
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: J-dog on December 15, 2010, 11:24:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Wannabe1:
What did he eat just before dying?!    :laughing:  
That is hillarious! and I agree - whatever that is it has more than yote.

J
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Fischman on December 15, 2010, 11:35:00 PM
I'm throwing the bs flag also that things not a yote.. I've killed hundreds of coyotes and they just don't get that big, it looks like a dog or a dog wolf cross. Them guys must think we all smoke wacky weed to try and convince anyone its a yote! Or maybe they are smoking wacky weed down there!!! LOL
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: motorhead7963 on December 16, 2010, 12:04:00 AM
Yeahhhh!! I would be questioning the accuracy of the scale and the credibility of those making the claim!! THAT AINT NO COYOTE!!!!
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: elknutz on December 16, 2010, 12:11:00 AM
Guess we now know where my daughters dog ended up!

 (http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb356/elknutz/Doggysitting015.jpg)
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: FerretWYO on December 16, 2010, 12:44:00 AM
Man and I thought that the one that I got out there with you was a big one.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Longbow Jake on December 16, 2010, 01:11:00 AM
Okay we are all thinkin it I'll just come on out and say it and we will all sleep better tonight you ready?.............................Its a.....WEREYOTE!!! watch your backs fellas   :scared:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Sixby on December 16, 2010, 02:12:00 AM
Not a coyote and from that pic it looks like a lot less weight than they are saying. I hunted coyotes for 7 years for a living and the largest I ever killed was about 55 lb and that is in big open sage coyote country where everything is big. They are called prime Montanas in the fur trade. I don't know how many coyotes my brother and son and I took in that time but it was way more than enough to get a good sampling of what a coyote is. Most matures yotes would go about 30 lbs for males and 25 for females. A forty lb dog was considered exceptional.
This pup is either a cross breed wolf dog or a wolf and not in too good of shape from the pic. I would say possibly a young male wolf that was kicked out of a pack and started traveling.

God Bless you all and Merry Christmas, Steve
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: T Lail on December 16, 2010, 06:38:00 AM
did they test him for steroids ??????? that is one big yote........  :dunno:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: wollelybugger on December 16, 2010, 07:16:00 AM
We have some Coy dogs here in Pa. that get big but not that big. We have all kinds of color combos, from black to blond.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: swp on December 16, 2010, 07:27:00 AM
Have steroids invaded the coyote world now???  :)
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: bornagainbowhunter on December 16, 2010, 08:32:00 AM
I killed a monster yote earlier this year and I would be willing to bet (never weighed) that it did not break 50#.  The critter in the pic don't look like a yote to me.  If I saw it in the woods I likely would not have shot it because I would not want to kill Fluffy.

It really looks like a timber wolf I used to have.  Mine was 98% timber wolf and 2% Malamute.  I think its a pet or ferel.

God Bless,
Nathan
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Mint on December 16, 2010, 09:13:00 AM
Sure doesn't look like a coyote to me. I readsomewhere that red wolves are basically large coyotes but there shouldn't be any in MO.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: J-dog on December 16, 2010, 09:39:00 AM
Red wolves I have seen are basically the same size as a yote. They run around Pungo and I have had the pleasure of a couple up close encounters. Take this word from a NON biologist for what it is worth (default staement! LOL)

I would be scared to predator hunt where red wolves are located!

J
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: snag on December 16, 2010, 09:49:00 AM
I wonder if it wasn't a wolf/yote mix? There are some in Oregon that say this is occurring here.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: -Achilles- on December 16, 2010, 10:22:00 AM
Well I have been seeing a huge dog(or what I thought was a dog) where I hunt in missouri.I've seen it at least once a year the last few years.I always thought it was an alaskan malamute but now I may reconsider.The thing is HUGE and very wide bodied.100 pounds for sure.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: TommyBoy on December 16, 2010, 11:23:00 AM
While we are on the topic of coyotes, does anybody else in MO notice them getting alot bolder? I have been walking my bird dogs on MDC land in the evenings to give them some exercise for the past 12 years. Usually in the winter, so it's always at night.  I've always heard coyotes around me in the past, but this year there's a lot more AND THEY ARE HOLDING THEIR GROUND - not running away like normal. Eventually they take off, but we are right on top of them before they do (within 30 yards). Even had one growl menacingly at us.  My dogs are always off-leash, so this made me take notice. In fact, we had a couple coyotes flanking us on the other side of a windbreak. They paralleled our steps for more than a quarter mile.

Anyone else notice behavior like this. It's got me concerned enough that I carry a pistol on my walks now. Never did that in 12 years.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: TDHunter on December 16, 2010, 11:32:00 AM
Looks like my old dog!   The DNA test may have been smoking something special
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on December 16, 2010, 11:42:00 AM
Thats a wolf or husky mix. No way is that a coyote
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: TommyBoy on December 16, 2010, 11:52:00 AM
It was DNA tested Roger. It's a yote.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Jeremy on December 16, 2010, 11:54:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by TommyBoy:
AND THEY ARE HOLDING THEIR GROUND...Anyone else notice behavior like this.
They're getting that bold here in CT too.  I've talked to two people who have lost their dogs, presumably to coyotes.  Same story in both cases: out walking the dogs in the woods with occasional glimpses of coyotes.  'yote eventually gets in closer and draws the dog off - dog never seen again.  Can't really confirm their stories, but hearing the same thing from two sources has my attention.

I've seen larger coyotes the last few years, but not close to 100# - more like a small to medium sized german shepherd.  The fact that they're standing still to watch me rather than running off before I see them is troubling.

Nothing good can happen when a predator loses its fear of man.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: waknstak IL on December 16, 2010, 11:56:00 AM
The MDC can say what they want. I'm not buying that being a pure coyote either.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: TxAg on December 16, 2010, 12:03:00 PM
BS flag is up.

Can claim it was DNA tested all they want, still doesn't mean they're telling the truth.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Huntschool on December 16, 2010, 12:09:00 PM
I am not going to solve this debate but here are some things to consider.. (this is professional commentary...  don't shoot me!

1. Color has nothing to do with anything.  There are color phases in all living biota.

2. Size, as well, is not fixed.  Bergman’s Law states basically that over North to South distribution of a species the northern most will be heavier and somewhat larger than those in the south. This has to do with climate and species adaptation.  Look at our deer.  Borealis (northern most sub species) are huge compared to Texanus sub species...  and I have not added Key deer. Not that there are not specific individuals in any sub species that break the rules.

3. DNA analysis has come a long way.  I had quail blind tested, by a lab, that had been in the wild for four generations and the lab found pen reared markers in their examination.  I knew it and was checking the effectiveness of their analysis.

4. As biological professionals we have come a long way in determining ancestry and species lines.  This shows itself even in RMEF provision for reintroduction as well as NWTF.

I am not defending The MO Department, however, they have a great reputation and I truly doubt they would do anything to change that.

I know there are "one off's" that can contradict almost anything but in general coyotes in a pack enjoy a bit of dog for lunch.  There are stories all over about this type of thing.  Wolves are the same. I can only recall one instance of a crossbred coyote being confirmed and for the life of me I am unable to find that in my data files. Check with some of the upland guys that have been grouse and woodcock hunting in MN the past two years.

Personally, in both pictures, I do not see a wolf muzzle on this beast.  His head and facial structure look like coyote to me....

I am going to defer to the DNA lab……
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: TommyBoy on December 16, 2010, 12:18:00 PM
Jeremy,

Ya, when they lose their fear of man, things change. When I start to hear them calling, I call my dogs back in within 30 yards. They are shorthairs, so they are wide ranging - especially the little 45lb female. I'm just afraid the yotes are going to do a "rope a dope" - a single getting one of my dogs to chase him back to the pack.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Jeff Strubberg on December 16, 2010, 12:36:00 PM
That is one very well groomed coyote.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Ken Taylor on December 16, 2010, 12:57:00 PM
Huntschool, I am with you on this one.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: snag on December 16, 2010, 01:07:00 PM
I love those coyotes that are "bolder". Gives me a chance to reach out "touch" one!    :thumbsup:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Jesse Minish on December 16, 2010, 02:11:00 PM
If they say its a coyote fine. To me it looks more like the wolves Ive seen in Alaska and Canada but that doesn't really matter. Here is a pic I took bear hunting in Canada of a about a 60# wolf. Most people thought it was a coyote when they first looked at it...
 (http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg106/jesseminish/100_0414.jpg)
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Blackhawk on December 16, 2010, 03:51:00 PM
Very interesting comments here.  

That’s an amazing weight for a coyote, and from the picture, I’d say wolf-coyote mix.  The unusually large coyotes of eastern Canada, Newfoundland and New England are now considered a hybred with more coyote than wolf genes.  

I see where some experts are also stating that the wolf of eastern North America should be a distinct species from Grey wolves.  This is certainly possible since the so-called Eastern Timber wolf looks a lot like the Red wolves.  The so-called Manitoba wolf is considered more aligned with the Red Wolf than grey.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: bad arrow on December 16, 2010, 04:29:00 PM
One more if I may. I saw a very large wild dog that looked exactly like a husky/coyote mix a couple years back. He was too big to be coyote in my opinion. Darn near identical to the one pictured....Phil
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: SEMO_HUNTER on December 16, 2010, 05:21:00 PM
Well, one final word on the subject and I'll leave it alone.
Maybe I'm just a green horn, maybe I don't have a clue what a coyote looks like, and I know there are exceptions to every rule.
And it's just completely out of the question that our own beloved department of conservation would ever go so far as to lie to us or even stretch the truth.....  :rolleyes:    :saywhat:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Friend on December 16, 2010, 05:27:00 PM
Critters that are enormously large may take on characteristics quite different from what we have been accustomed to seeing. One analogy, possibly a poor one, is that most every fisherman is quite familiar with the profile of a two pound bass. A ten pound bass here in KY is rare and actually looks like a different species. Fishermen don’t question its visual appearance because we have seen mounts and photos as well as plentiful coverage by the media. I once had the fortune to catch an 18” six pound KY. My partner and I question whether this was actually a bass or not. Another analogy is that deer in KY are quite plentiful and may attain respectable weight. I had prepared three years for a hunt in western Iowa and as soon as I got there and saw 200# does up close, I knew I was ill prepared. Numerous photos, films and literature didn’t replace seeing these deer in person. The dramatic size difference took me at least four days to acclimate.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: 30coupe on December 16, 2010, 05:34:00 PM
Hmmm, three times the weight of a coyote, ears rounder than that of a coyote, muzzle broader than a coyote, legs longer than most coyotes...yup, it must be a coyote. No government agency would give false information. We didn't have mountain lions in Iowa either, until a couple of them got shot. Pictures, tracks and scat didn't convince our DNR that there were mountain lions here. If there were mountain lions, the DNR would have to manage them.

Nope that's definitely not a wolf. It just resembles one in size and shape, but it can't be a wolf because the Missouri DNR says it's not a wolf. Wolves are protected in Missouri because there aren't any.

Oh, did I mention I have a large tract of beach front property just north of Phoenix that I would like to sell?

Sorry, but my BS detector went off on that one.     "[dntthnk]"

I am in complete agreement with Semo on this one. I've hunted them in Iowa for 40+ years and have never seen one that large. I did see a wolf in Minnesota though and the similarities to those pictures is truly striking.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: jsweka on December 16, 2010, 05:48:00 PM
I have to agree with Huntschool on the previous page.  There is a lot of variation in the phenotype of species (what they look like).

Here's an example.
 (http://i954.photobucket.com/albums/ae23/jsweka/WorldTallestManMeetsWorldShortestManhGsuJnWXDMFl.jpg)

Would you argue that these two individuals are of different species?  They sure look different.  I'm pretty sure genetic analysis would say they are both Homo sapiens. But that DNA black magic has to be wrong because they look so different.  -Bull.

Genetic analysis is the best way to identify a species.  If MDC had the analysis done and it says it's a coyote, I have to believe it.  I agree it doesn't look like any coyote I've ever seen, but as I said above you can't always go by what a critter looks like.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: -Achilles- on December 16, 2010, 06:01:00 PM
Badarrow...That is what I seen.I didnt shoot it because I thought it was a husky dog.It is at least 100 pound dog its huge.

Alot of coyote (Canis latrans) experts on here.LOL...But

Lets not forget redwolves(Canis rufus).They are just like a coyote just a lil bigger and can weigh close to 100 pounds and I'm pretty sure they have been known to breed with grey wolves as it seems like I read that some where.They are endangered.Some of you probably shot 1 and thought it was a big coyote.

So there is another possibility.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Mark Baker on December 16, 2010, 06:47:00 PM
I'm saying BS too!   While our wildlife agencies are good, they are known to mask truth in various ways that fit their political needs, or longterm goals.   Montana as well.  

For years here officials denied wolves were living in Yellowstone (before the reintroduction and long after they were trapped and killed out earlier in the 1900's) and yet several sightings routinely occured every year.  As a local and young zoology major, I saw a wolf in Yellowstone in the 70's.   There is no mistaking wolves from coyotes here....but the agenda was to get wolves reintroduced.   Of course that injected a lot of $$$$ into their USFWS coffers and gave several folks lifetime careers here did'nt it?  The truth is they could'nt reintroduce this species if they acknowledged the return of wolves "naturally" to the ecosystem.  It's all about agendas and money, or at least a lot of it is.  

Like a lot of you, I've killed quite a few coyotes, and never seen one ever approach 100lbs....even the biggest ones killed by me or by my friends.  And last I checked, MT is about as far north as you can get in the lower 48.  

100 pounds...truth be told...is actually about as big as most wolves will get.  Some get bigger, but that is a big dog.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Bobby Urban on December 16, 2010, 07:36:00 PM
I am on the BS train with most of you.  I agree there are anomolies in all species that are larger - sometimes much larger that usual but come on...  This would be more than 3 times larger than average and double the largest anyone posted here - or anyone has even heard of here.  Take any species you can think of and think of it 3 times larger than known average and double a giant of the species.  We are talking about a 600lb whitetail or a 15-1800lb black bear or a griz pushing 4G.  Or maybe a 100lb northern pike or a 30-40lb bass.  Just beyond realistic and I am thinking there is an agenda.  I would like an independent lab to perform the DNA test before I could believe this dog is 100% coyote if it is coyote at all.  

As far as coyotes taking dogs - I was stump shooting with my dog one time and we came upon a lone coyote.  It saw my dog first and they stood watching each other for a few seconds like two dogs do - kind of sizing eash other up from about 20yards.  Then the coyote started away slowly with a limping, wounded gate.  I watched as my dog started after it and quickly yelled to call him off.  This is the first the coyote saw or knew of me being there and he took off like a shot - no limp at all.  I am absolutely convinced his plan was to lure my dog into a pack or group and take him out.  This all took 60-90 seconds and was a real eye opener for me.  

Bob Urban
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: 30coupe on December 16, 2010, 07:45:00 PM
jsweka,

Let's do a little math here. The tallest human EVER was Robert Wadlow, an amazing 8'11.1" tall. The average male is 5'9.7" tall, so Wadlow was 53.5% taller than average.

The average coyote weighs 18-46 pounds. So if we use the 46 pound weight, this rather lean "coyote" was 226% larger than average. The largest coyote on record weighed 74.75 pounds. That means this specimen was about 39% heavier that the LARGEST known coyote. If we were to use your human example we'd have a man (or woman) who was roughly 12'5" tall. Wouldn't the NBA scouts go nuts over that one! If our hypothetical human were as much larger than the average human male as this critter is to the average coyote he/she would be just over 13'1" tall. The coyote equivalent or Robert Waldow would weigh between 28 and 70 pounds, so the 74.75 pounder was a real monster.

Are you starting to grasp why some of us are a bit skeptical of the identification of that critter as a coyote?

MDC better be in contact with the Guiness Book of World Records because they just smashed one. Maybe Ripley's Believe It or Not would be more appropriate.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: jsweka on December 16, 2010, 08:06:00 PM
30coupe - I gave that example just to illustrate that there is a lot of variation in the size of a species.  Yes, a 104# coyote is way larger than average and very hard to believe.  Maybe the dang thing had a pituitary gland abnormality which caused it to over produce growth hormone and that's the reason why it's so big and doesn't look like your typical coyote. But if the genetic analysis idicates that it is a coyote, I have to believe it is a coyote.  We sentence people to death or set them free based on DNA analysis and the labratory procedures are exactly the same whether it is a human,bird, fish, or coyote in this case.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: on December 16, 2010, 08:07:00 PM
if i was the guy that shot it i would want it back! its a leagal coyote, wright? acording to mo dept of cons. its a coyote!!!! so he should get the credit due, what ever that may be.....
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: SEMO_HUNTER on December 16, 2010, 08:16:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by 30coupe:
jsweka,

Let's do a little math here. The tallest human EVER was Robert Wadlow, an amazing 8'11.1" tall. The average male is 5'9.7" tall, so Wadlow was 53.5% taller than average.

The average coyote weighs 18-46 pounds. So if we use the 46 pound weight, this rather lean "coyote" was 226% larger than average. The largest coyote on record weighed 74.75 pounds. That means this specimen was about 39% heavier that the LARGEST known coyote. If we were to use your human example we'd have a man (or woman) who was roughly 12'5" tall. Wouldn't the NBA scouts go nuts over that one! If our hypothetical human were as much larger than the average human male as this critter is to the average coyote he/she would be just over 13'1" tall. The coyote equivalent or Robert Waldow would weigh between 28 and 70 pounds, so the 74.75 pounder was a real monster.

Are you starting to grasp why some of us are a bit skeptical of the identification of that critter as a coyote?

MDC better be in contact with the Guiness Book of World Records because they just smashed one. Maybe Ripley's Believe It or Not would be more appropriate.
Amen!! Perfect Analogy.....Thank You!!   :clapper:  

Now......Who else wants to call BS?? Anybody?

If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck.......well then it must be a Wolf?
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: 30coupe on December 16, 2010, 08:17:00 PM
jsweka,

I don't disbelieve DNA evidence. I do disbelieve government agencies. If you read the article it is full of contradictory information. Also, if you do some research on canis rufus (red wolf) you will find that DNA test on them come back as coyote most of the time and grey wolf some of the time, indicative of hybridization. Even the MDC article mentions speculation that this is a hybrid. So they come out and call it a coyote, then they admit it might not be a true coyote in their own article.

Since wolves are protected in MO (even though they aren't there) they would have had to charge the hunter with killing a protected species. Calling it a coyote means no charges need be filed, so everybody is happy. It's BS, but everybody's happy.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Covey on December 16, 2010, 08:17:00 PM
Dang, That's one big dog!! Jason
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: SEMO_HUNTER on December 16, 2010, 08:19:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by jsweka:
30coupe - I gave that example just to illustrate that there is a lot of variation in the size of a species.  Yes, a 104# coyote is way larger than average and very hard to believe.  Maybe the dang thing had a pituitary gland abnormality which caused it to over produce growth hormone and that's the reason why it's so big and doesn't look like your typical coyote. But if the genetic analysis idicates that it is a coyote, I have to believe it is a coyote.  We sentence people to death or set them free based on DNA analysis and the labratory procedures are exactly the same whether it is a human,bird, fish, or coyote in this case.
Dude we are talking about a coyote versus a wolf, not a murder trial. Just because the state government claims the DNA test confirmed it's a coyote doesn't mean it's the gospel.
Well......in a perfect world....yes it would be.

I would ask for the "coyote" back myself and then call Ripley's......and the Guiness Book!!
Get me a paycheck!   :jumper:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: SEMO_HUNTER on December 16, 2010, 08:22:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by 30coupe:
jsweka,

I don't disbelieve DNA evidence. I do disbelieve government agencies. If you read the article it is full of contradictory information. Also, if you do some research on canis rufus (red wolf) you will find that DNA test on them come back as coyote most of the time and grey wolf some of the time, indicative of hybridization. Even the MDC article mentions speculation that this is a hybrid. So they come out and call it a coyote, then they admit it might not be a true coyote in their own article.

Since wolves are protected in MO (even though they aren't there) they would have had to charge the hunter with killing a protected species. Calling it a coyote means no charges need be filed, so everybody is happy. It's BS, but everybody's happy.
Wow, man you are on a roll! Once again....you just smacked the nail right on the head!  :knothead:  
I'll just shut up and let you handle the particulars from now on.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: -Achilles- on December 16, 2010, 08:27:00 PM
I'd have shot it too.I know that.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: on December 16, 2010, 08:29:00 PM
i woulda shot even if it was a wolf !
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: kennym on December 16, 2010, 09:55:00 PM
I see almost everyone thinks a 104# yote is a stretch,that is my thought also.

There could be several reasons to downplay the issue,probably the most important is to keep the public panic down.

At any rate,if I happen to shoot a 104#er,I plan to take many pics,run a metal detector over it, then a geiger counter,then call the MDC to see if it is truly a yote.  :D  

Now then..........  :archer2:
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Hot Hap on December 17, 2010, 02:17:00 AM
I don't believe that any DNA lab would allow anyone to lie about the results of any test that they have done. They would be out of business in a heartbeat. Hap
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Don Stokes on December 17, 2010, 06:25:00 AM
DNA results would have to be ambiguous in the dog/wolf/coyote clan, because of cross-species interbreeding that has been going on forever where ranges overlap. To my knowledge, there has been no such cross-species breeding in the human/ape population, which is the closest comparison we can make for ourselves. Human DNA analysis would be much more reliable than anything done with the canine group.

Whatever it is called, that is one big canine!
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: dirtguy on December 17, 2010, 06:31:00 AM
On the other hand, if we are talking about weight, the heaviest humans have been over 1000 lbs.  That more than 4 times my weight, and I ain't skinny! 4 times 30lbs is 120 lbs!

In every species there are extreme examples of size.

Not impossible that it was a coyote.  


In terms of them getting bolder - they are around here.  A couple of years ago I found one eating a fawn in my neighbor's driveway just after sunrise.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Bonebuster on December 17, 2010, 07:07:00 AM
If this animal IS a coyote according to DNA testing, it is amazing.

If the MDC is relaying ANYTHING but the TRUTH to the public on ANY aspect of this story, it is truely SCARY.

Anything but the TRUTH told to the public leaves us where?
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: 30coupe on December 17, 2010, 07:26:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Bonebuster:
If this animal IS a coyote according to DNA testing, it is amazing.

If the MDC is relaying ANYTHING but the TRUTH to the public on ANY aspect of this story, it is truely SCARY.

Anything but the TRUTH told to the public leaves us where?
It leaves us where we were in Iowa when we didn't have mountain lions...according to the DNR. That was in spite of sightings, tracks, and scat. We don't have a lot of them, but we do have them. If the critter in Missouri is a red wolf type of hybrid, the DNA could very well come back as coyote. If that is the case MDC isn't entirely lying. They just aren't telling the truth. Even their own article is crafted in such a way as to leave room for doubt.

Weight is not the entire equation in this case. The pictures show a relatively thin or rangy animal. If its weight was truly 104 pounds, it had to be MUCH taller than a coyote. That thing wasn't obese. Not in the least! Nor did it appear to suffer from any of the maladies normally associated with giantism in humans (note the crutch in the posted picture).

Heaven help us if we all begin to believe everything coming from a government agency is the truth!
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Mudd on December 17, 2010, 07:35:00 AM
If we are going to have yotes of this size showing up here in Missouri maybe they need to be moved into the "Big Game" category...lol

There is a Red Wolf project that's been going on here for years now. They have a special enclosure for them somewhere near St Louis( a little south and west of there)I wish my memory was better so I could give you more concrete details.

Even as the crow flies it's a long ways from where this "yote" was shot.

God bless,Mudd

PS:Check this out,http://www.wildcanidcenter.org/Home/default.htm
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: on December 17, 2010, 09:22:00 AM
mudd, its called( tyson research park ). my cousin says he can here them howling sometimes if the wind is rite,its next to lone elk park...if thats any help,......and i would think that the dept. of conservation has there own labs for dna and stuff like that,..just guessing though,i know they use dna to catch poachers,an agent (freind) told me that.......(big game list)....thats a booner!
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Benha on December 17, 2010, 12:14:00 PM
Looks like a Southern Kentucky cheek snapper to me. Have to retest the DNA to be sure though.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: flungonin on December 17, 2010, 07:57:00 PM
Missouri just might be doing all of you a favor. By calling it a Coyote they are legally allowing these to be shot. Whats wrong with that? It's better than the northern states that have their hands tied and can't shoot the "coyote" that is devastating the wildgame herds at an alarming rate. Almost everyone on here with thier many years of experience and expertise agree on what this is thats called a coyote. Most would shoot it, be happy that DNR is really working on your side. This is a blessing in disguise. Loadem up boys and get you a doggy. I would go along with the Coyote theory/claim and shoot as many of those as possible. Because once the DNR claims Wolf, watch your wildgame numbers deplete and the politicians drag thier feet for years on getting them (WOLFS) delisted while wildgame goes down to enreturnable numbers.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: -Achilles- on December 18, 2010, 12:29:00 AM
Legal or not I don't know any hunters that don't shoot coyotes in season or not.They would have to be endangered before I wouldnt shoot one.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: SEMO_HUNTER on December 18, 2010, 12:39:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by -Achilles-:
Legal or not I don't know any hunters that don't shoot coyotes in season or not.They would have to be endangered before I wouldnt shoot one.
Coyote season is only closed for a short while during spring turkey season, then opens right back up immediately afterward.
That's doesn't stop anybody from killing them during turkey season though. That's when lots of them are shot just because so many hunters are in the woods at that time.......same goes for deer season, more hunters in the woods with guns and bows.
There are still a few of us die hards that go out during fall, winter, and even summer specifically to hunt for the mangy, deer killin' critters.
Studies have shown that coyote eat more newborn fawns than originally expected, they also destroy the spring hatch for ground nesting birds.....the eat more eggs than birds.
I like my turkey, deer, and rabbits........so coyote are always on my to do list.
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Longbow Jake on December 18, 2010, 06:54:00 AM
Yeah Mudd I heard about something like that awhile back where they were trying to kill off all mixed coyote mixed with red wolves, cause pure red wolves were dang near gone We thinking of the same thing?
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: Precurve on December 18, 2010, 07:15:00 AM
I saw two of these in our recent gun deer season and they all looked exactly like this 104# "coyote".  Up here we call them Grey Wolves.

Dave
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: highpoint forge on December 18, 2010, 02:02:00 PM
Ummmm....there's about four of those in my neighborhood, all on leashes.

Can you say pissed off dog owner?
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: buckeye_hunter on December 18, 2010, 02:12:00 PM
I went to the article online and looked at the picture. I expected to see a large coyote.

I have seen many coyotes and NEVER one that looked like that. He looked like a wolf to me..... Just sayin'

If I had shot that, I would honestly say I shot a wolf or someone's mix breed.

Just my 2 cents.. Did you guys get to see the pic? Here is the link.

  http://www.kmbc.com/r/26121874/detail.html
Title: Re: 104 # yote in MO??
Post by: highpoint forge on December 18, 2010, 02:22:00 PM
Last fishing trip on the Gallatin and Soda Butte Rivers in MT I had a white wolf come up within 50 yds of me and was just watching me (I had no idea he was there), according to my fishing buddy who told me to turn around. I did. That thing ran off and went straight up a steep hill leading up a mountain. It was freakin' big.