Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: mmisciag on August 18, 2011, 12:47:00 PM

Title: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: mmisciag on August 18, 2011, 12:47:00 PM
OK, I'm heading to Lancaster Archery tomorrow for the big sale. I want to buy a climbing tree stand. I have narrowed it to two models but need to make a decision. Lone Wolf hand climber or the Summit Open shot? There is about $100+ difference in cost. Lone Wolf being more expensive. I weigh 250# so I am at the limit usually for these things.

Opinions needed. (:

Martin
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: Shawn Leonard on August 18, 2011, 01:01:00 PM
Lone Wolf without a doubt, try standing on the very edge(attched a foot off the ground for safty reasons) of the Summit towards one side with both feet. It will scare you, not the LW, very stable even when you have to move into an awkward position to shoot. Also much quieter climbing and sitting in as well! Shawn
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: Kyle Lancaster on August 18, 2011, 01:05:00 PM
I agree with Shawn. I own both stands (older summit).
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: LV2HUNT on August 18, 2011, 01:13:00 PM
Lone Wolf. It is better in every single area except for one which would be seat comfort. The difference in that though is so small as to not even matter. Try to use or at least see them setup.

The only negative to the Lone Wolf hand climber is comfort otherwise it is close to perfect. For me the sit and climb was not any more comfortable (like the middle seat of an airplane) and was not nearly as versatile as the hand climber.
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: 59Alaskan on August 18, 2011, 01:24:00 PM
I have never tried the LW.  I have no major complaint about my Open Shot.  I like it.
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: Shawn Leonard on August 18, 2011, 02:19:00 PM
Yup, handclimber is the way to go! If you are gonnasit all day get a hang on, but for sits of 4 hours or so, the LW will get ya thru and you can bring a small cushion to help. The summit(I owned a few) is not a bad stand and I did not mean to imply that, but the LW is far superior! Shawn
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: m midd on August 18, 2011, 02:50:00 PM
I prefer the open shot.. Im 6'1" 250# and have had both.. I trust the cable a little more than a belt..
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: mmisciag on August 18, 2011, 03:18:00 PM
I was leaning toward the LW becuase it is so compact. Weight wise they are close to the same. I have owned a Summit in the past. I was 29 lbs and I should have never sold it. It did have a bar around the front of it which made it difficult to shoot from. However, I could sit and climb.

Cable or belt? I think that the belt would be a bit more quite. I have used the cable and that did make some noise going into the metal holder. Not bad but I always had to be careful. I ride a motorcycle and know that some bikes come with a belt drive. I know that they can be built very sturdy. But you do bring up a good point.

Well, I only have a few more hours to make a decision. Tomorrow is coming fast...

Thanks for all the input.

Martin
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: Dave Thaxton on August 18, 2011, 03:20:00 PM
Never been on a LW...once I used my Summitt I saw no need to look further for THE climber
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: Longspur77 on August 18, 2011, 03:26:00 PM
used both and my go to stand is Treewalker. It is set up like an ol man but you can climb a metal telephone pole and it wont slip. You just got to shoot over the front rail(i shoot a 60 in shawnee)They also make one with out the front rail.
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: Easykeeper on August 18, 2011, 03:32:00 PM
I've only used the Lone Wolf hand climber, mainly because it does everything I want a climber to do.  Packs flat, super quiet, versatile.  The seat alone makes a nice little place for your butt when hunting from makeshift ground blinds.
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: LV2HUNT on August 18, 2011, 04:22:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by mmisciag:
I was leaning toward the LW becuase it is so compact. Weight wise they are close to the same. I have owned a Summit in the past. I was 29 lbs and I should have never sold it. It did have a bar around the front of it which made it difficult to shoot from. However, I could sit and climb.

Cable or belt? I think that the belt would be a bit more quite. I have used the cable and that did make some noise going into the metal holder. Not bad but I always had to be careful. I ride a motorcycle and know that some bikes come with a belt drive. I know that they can be built very sturdy. But you do bring up a good point.

Well, I only have a few more hours to make a decision. Tomorrow is coming fast...

Thanks for all the input.

Martin
You can sit and climb with the hand climber. They include a strap that connects to the hand climber for this purpose. It works reasonably well but I never use it since climbing is relatively easy.

The Summit Open Shot is a good stand but when you do a point by point comparison you will see what I mean. I did the same and looked very carefully at the Open Shot and that was the second time I bought a Lone Wolf hand climber.
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: J. Cook on August 18, 2011, 05:33:00 PM
I have to go against the crowd a bit here...I'm a summit fan, and have owned a few of their models.  Not the open shot -- but the Cobra (from 2000 or so) and it's the same, open front.  I did not like climbing with the LW hand climber at all!  Just didn't like the feel of it.  Both are good stands, but you can buy a dozen arrows, superior fletching, and some nice trimmings for the difference in costs.
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: BUCKY on August 18, 2011, 08:57:00 PM
I have the Lone Wolf hand climber top and a Loggy bottom,great combo.
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: Kapellmeister on August 18, 2011, 09:02:00 PM
I like the Lone Wolf Sit & Climb (the one for a WIDE load!)   ;)
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: BD on August 18, 2011, 11:09:00 PM
LW
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: Gordon Jabben on August 18, 2011, 11:09:00 PM
I really like my LW hand climber.
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: mmisciag on August 18, 2011, 11:10:00 PM
Jon,

That is the problem! Cost.

Thanks everyone for the input.

Martin
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: babs on August 19, 2011, 01:11:00 AM
summit is all I use, I use the goliath platform and use a open top section works great the summit is a solid stand been using them for years
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: Apex Predator on August 19, 2011, 05:50:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by babs:
summit is all I use, I use the goliath platform and use a open top section works great the summit is a solid stand been using them for years
I do the same.  The only fault with the open shot is the small platform.  I use my Razor platform with the open shot climbing section.  Perfect stand!
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: Tim on August 19, 2011, 09:31:00 AM
Martin,

Must I speak with you again on this subject?   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Climbing Tree Stand Decision
Post by: tecum-tha on August 19, 2011, 09:38:00 AM
LW, period.
Set it up and climbed a tree 50 yards from an elk herd. So the thing is light and quiet...
Yes, they're expensive, but worth it.
Mine is going strong for 12 years now...