What struck me as interesting is the manner that the anti-hunter stated in a nonchalant, matter of fact manner that gun hunters are expected to demonstrate the ability to keep 4 shots within 1" at 100 yards, when the truth is that very few localities had any such requirement. Plus, he stated the elimination of predators by hunters was the major cause of over population of game, rather than habitat destruction.
Then, as now, the other side has no concern for accuracy when making their arguments regarding the validity of hunting. They embrace an ideology with no concern about the logic (or lack thereof) of their position. These people, in my opinion, are not our friends, and their intent has not diminished at all.