3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)  (Read 372 times)

Offline Brett Hammons

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Well, the title explains it all!  I haven't made a post on here in years, but I visit the site often.  I was bored today, and had a thick hard cover Cabelas catalog lying about the house and thought maybe I should shoot broadheads into it for "research".   I used my light poundage recurve the venerable Martin X-200 @ 35# draw weight at 28".  Arrows were CX Heritage 90's and all shots were from 12 yards. Results:
175 grain Eclipse Werewolf (2 blade) 802 pages
125 Magnus Snuffer SS (3 blade) 924 pages
125 Slicktrick Razortrick (4 blade) 725 pages
I thought it was interesting I got more from the 3 blade coc broadhead.  Like I stated unscientific, but fun and interesting for sure.  Also, should be noted that a tuned 35pound bow is plenty for deer sized game.  At least at my 28" draw.   :deadhorse:

Offline Alexander Traditional

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3696
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2016, 02:47:00 PM »
I like messing around like that too. I saw a you tube video where a guy got more penetration out of the three blade as well.

Online Longtoke

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1093
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2016, 04:21:00 PM »
It's all relevant to the medium being used to test penetration. Go buy a bunch of meat and shoot through that, or get a bunch of drywall, or plywood.  I bet the two blades will edge out the 3 blade in some. Heck I bet a blunt would be the best penetrators on some of those tests. It's important to remember that none of these mediums are a good representation of the way broadheads work in live game.
Toelke Pika t/d 54" 52#
Bear Polar 56” 40#
Black Hunter 60" 40#

Offline Shadowhnter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1045
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2016, 04:44:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Longtoke:
It's all relevant to the medium being used to test penetration. Go buy a bunch of meat and shoot through that, or get a bunch of drywall, or plywood.  I bet the two blades will edge out the 3 blade in some. Heck I bet a blunt would be the best penetrators on some of those tests. It's important to remember that none of these mediums are a good representation of the way broadheads work in live game.
X2!!!!!

Offline Brett Hammons

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2016, 05:52:00 PM »
I think the main point being all styles will penetrate through the deer regardless.  Even with a low poundage bow.  Pun intended.

Offline nineworlds9

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4605
  • Northman
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2016, 06:13:00 PM »
I shot a 46# Zipper once and missed the bag at 25+ yds.  The 10gpp arrow with field point completely penetrated one side wall of a galvanized steel fence post that was part of the target stand. I'm pretty sure a traditional bow can get the job done when called upon.
52" Texas Recurve
58" Two Tracks Ogemaw
60" Toelke Chinook
62" Tall Tines Stickflinger
64" Big Jim Mountain Monarch
64" Poison Dart LB
66" Wes Wallace Royal
            
Horse Creek TAC, GA
TBOF

Online Pine

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 4299
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2016, 02:15:00 AM »
Something to consider , when shooting a deer sized animal , the head and arrow get lubricated on the way through .
This makes me wonder why there is so much concern about penitration and the silly gimics like Teflon coating .
Did enjoy your experiment , it reminds me of one done back in the 1960s comparing broadheads to hunting rifles . Was done with a New York phone book .
The broadheads from a 45# bow far out penetrated the rifles .
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they have been fooled. Mark Twain

If you're afraid to offend, you can't be honest.

TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline Brett Hammons

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2016, 12:06:00 PM »
I want to see how Underwood 10mm ammo does against the evil Cabelas Catalog.

Offline Sam McMichael

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6873
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2016, 01:58:00 PM »
The problem with these tests is that the sample is usually too small to get a reliable statistical result. Even when one logs the hits on game, there is often great variance. I don't think it really matters, though. If a broad head is sharp, and the arrow is well tuned, it will kill a deer. That is all the testing I need to see. I guess I don't share the same level of curiosity some others do.
Sam

Offline YosemiteSam

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1092
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2016, 02:39:00 PM »
If I had to, I'd feel fine lobbing an arrow at medium-sized game with my 30# recurve.  Modern recurves, laminates, R/D bows & fast flight strings easily add 5-10# over the average primitive bow.  Heavy arrows are hard to stop at any speed.  

Thankfully, I don't have to...
"A good hunter...that's somebody the animals COME to."
"Every animal knows way more than you do." -- by a Koyukon hunter, as quoted by R. Nelson.

Offline Brett Hammons

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2016, 04:46:00 PM »
So I shot the same book, but this time with a 2 blade Magnus classic and it went through the whole 1200 page book.  Well the tip punctured the back cover anyways.  After I pulled it out it still shaved hair!  Makes me wonder why I bought Silverflames earlier this year?!

Offline monterey

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 4248
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2016, 11:02:00 PM »
It seems that At 12 yards there can be a wide variation in the quality of flight of the arrow. Wonder what the results would be at 20 to 25 yards?
Monterey

"I didn't say all that stuff". - Confucius........and Yogi Berra

Online Steelhead

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2545
Re: Boredom and the Mad Scientist! ( unscientific penetration test)
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2016, 12:27:00 PM »
I think the main benefit of the 2 blade in regard to penetration is when you hit bone.Especially heavier bone.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©