I've not noticed the additional length of the heavier inserts to significantly change point of impact on the basis of them acting as an internal footing. I just got done testing this among other things.
For my particular bow/arrows, I have two arrow builds with just north of 225gr total weight up front:
- My stumping/target/small game arrows are being shot with a 100gr insert, 8gr aluminum footing cut to length of insert, and 125gr heads.
- My broadhead specific arrows are built with a standard 12gr Gold Tip insert, no external footing, and 225gr broadheads. (This puts my total broached point weights of all of my arrows within <5gr of each other which is close enough.)
From my testing, I get the same point of impact out to 40 yards (longest distance I have to shoot) with the following varied arrow builds using full length GT Traditionals with a combined point/insert/footing weight of ~235gr:
- Fletched shaft, 100gr insert, 125 gr field point
- Fletched shaft, 100gr insert, 125 gr broadhead
- Bare shaft, 100gr insert, 125 gr field point
- Fletched shaft, 100gr insert, 125gr RFA Talon/screw in rubber blunt/Judo point
- Fletched shaft, standard insert, 225 gr field point
- Fletched shaft, standard insert, 225 gr broadhead
- Bare shaft, standard insert, 225 gr field point
Therefore, based off of my tests, I've concluded that from my bow with a well tuned Gold Tip Traditional arrow as long as the overall point weight is equivalent and the shaft length is equivalent then the differences in weight distribution of points vs inserts, head length, head type, and insert length are negligible.