INFO: Trad Archery for Bowhunters



Author Topic: Heavy Weights?  (Read 819 times)

Offline Benny Nganabbarru

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 6549
Re: Heavy Weights?
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2009, 07:35:00 AM »
Well, FedEx is the best value after USPS is no longer an option due to length restrictions (FedEx cost a bit more, but deliver to my door and have no length restrictions).
TGMM - Family of the Bow

Online Charlie Lamb

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 8237
Re: Heavy Weights?
« Reply #21 on: August 06, 2009, 08:43:00 AM »
I've got a 78# and 120#+ Sunbear that I'd part with.
Hunt Sharp

Charlie

Offline TimberlineX

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Heavy Weights?
« Reply #22 on: August 06, 2009, 11:05:00 AM »
Ages ago I had a 90# Howard Hill Big Five longbow that I used as a trainer bow for my then-usual 75-80 hunting recurves. Ah, to be young and that strong again.

In fact, the very first pronghorn antelope I ever shot was taken with an 82# Archery 2000 SST recurve, while hunting in NW Wyoming with none other than this forum’s Charlie Lamb, who was living in Pinedale, WY at the time. Charlie said go here and have at it. I did.

Then a funny thing happened. With each passing decade I seemed to drop about 10 pounds in preferred hunting-bow weight. I’m not sure if that was atrophy or wisdom. Probably both. There was a long time when I couldn’t imagine dropping below 70# in a traditional hunting bow. Then, gradually and quite reluctantly, I had to admit that Fred Bear’s 65# felt good. Slowly, 60# came to make sense. And today, something around 55# seems like the ticket. In twenty more years I figure I’ll be shooting deer with a lady’s target bow.

When, for no particularly good reason, I began collecting old hunting recurves in the mid-1970s, one of the first bows I acquired was a 1959 Bear Kodiak from a man in Hawaii, of all places. He’d ordered it by mail from Bear Archery, but hadn’t shot it much. “Never did like that bow,” he told me. “Too hard to string, man.”

I still have that ‘59. And while not in the monster-weight range, it’s definitely stout.

Bill Krenz
Colorado

 

Offline newell38

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Re: Heavy Weights?
« Reply #23 on: August 06, 2009, 04:54:00 PM »
man bill...like i said before...id give a kidney for a bow like that!!! ben, ill get you some pics!  i also have an 85# super mag with the original box that id be willing to part with!
"The worst thing I can be is the same as everybody else. I hate that.” – Arnold Schwarzenegger
Endless loop strings, heavy bows, and wood and only wood arrows...my kind of archery!

Offline marlon

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 230
Re: Heavy Weights?
« Reply #24 on: August 07, 2009, 01:47:00 AM »
Does anyone have 100# plus they want to sell? Im looking Lefty.
marlon torres

Offline newell38

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Re: Heavy Weights?
« Reply #25 on: August 08, 2009, 12:29:00 PM »
"The worst thing I can be is the same as everybody else. I hate that.” – Arnold Schwarzenegger
Endless loop strings, heavy bows, and wood and only wood arrows...my kind of archery!

Offline newell38

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Re: Heavy Weights?
« Reply #26 on: August 08, 2009, 12:30:00 PM »
 
"The worst thing I can be is the same as everybody else. I hate that.” – Arnold Schwarzenegger
Endless loop strings, heavy bows, and wood and only wood arrows...my kind of archery!

Offline azdriheat

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 63
Re: Heavy Weights?
« Reply #27 on: August 08, 2009, 01:34:00 PM »
100#, LH, 68 Kodiak here. Got any trade bait?

-Joe-

Offline Benny Nganabbarru

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 6549
Re: Heavy Weights?
« Reply #28 on: August 08, 2009, 04:16:00 PM »
Thanks, Justin. That bow looks sweet! I'm keen to get her over here hunting! PM sent.
TGMM - Family of the Bow

Offline fatman

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1312
Re: Heavy Weights?
« Reply #29 on: August 08, 2009, 06:05:00 PM »
All across Australia, feral animals are trembling.....  :eek:
"Better to have that thing and not need it, than to need it and not have it"
Woodrow F. Call

Commitment is like bacon & eggs; the chicken is involved, but the pig is committed....

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©