INFO: Trad Archery for Bowhunters



Author Topic: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special  (Read 1783 times)

Offline Mojostick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« on: July 21, 2014, 07:02:00 PM »
I had mentioned this bow before, but after a chat with Blackhawk/Lon about the 1962 Kodiak Special's and how sweet they are, I thought I'd get around to a couple pictures showing the highlights of this bow. I got this bow from Bearbowman and we worked out a deal because he felt I should have this bow because I love how the 1962 Kodiak Special feels in the hand, shoots and looks. Plus I have a nice collection of '62 KS's. The 1962 Kodiak Special is the epitome of early 1960's Americana, with that first year of the wild and cool sea foam green glass. If they used bows on the TV show Mad Men, it'd be the 1962 Kodiak Special.

My personal opinion is, the 1962 Kodiak Special is the best of the best to ever come out of Grayling. It's got the best grip of any Bear bow. I love the 1958-1960 Kodiak Special's and I also love the 1957-1962 Kodiak's, but I'm of the opinion that if the 1962 Kodiak Special came in dark green or brown glass, the 63" would be the most coveted Bear for collector-hunters and the 66" would be close behind.

Frankly, if Bear re-introduced the 63" 1962 Kodiak Special specs, but in typical "hunting colors", I think they'd have another retro hit on their hands. These bows are that good. I think most folks are hung up on the original color of the glass. Deer typically see dark blue. I suspect sea foam green will appear yellow to deer. If re-made in "Grayling Green", it'd be a super hunting bow.

The EXP bow I have has the 1961 Kodiak Special glass (avocado green) and a consensus of Brazilian bocote for the riser. It's 66", 36lbs and mint. It's not for sale or trade and while some collectors may think I'm nuts, I will be starting my bow season off with this bow this coming deer archery season. This bow needs to see the field and some blood. A bow unused is a useless bow, in my opinion. Another bow I'm going to try is a minty "standard" 63" 1962 Kodiak Special that's marked 30@24" and shoots like an absolute dream. There's no stack at 29". We'll settle the question if deer can see that sea foam green or not. If they can, I'll find out rather immediately, and if no reaction, then we'll also have an answer.

This EXP bow has a really cool thumb print below the glass. I wonder who at Bear left it? Normally, a thumb print on the limbs wouldn't be a positive, but given the uniqueness of this bow, I think the thumb print is a cool addition.

     

     

     

Offline Mojostick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2014, 07:06:00 PM »
The pictures still don't do the riser justice...
 

 

Offline Mojostick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2014, 07:08:00 PM »
Thumb print. A bit hard to see in the picture...
   

Offline Blackhawk

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3863
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #3 on: July 21, 2014, 08:26:00 PM »
Holy Cow!  What wood!!!  That's got to be one of the first bows ever with bacote.  Brazillian Rosewood was the standard, but the finest customs today cannot match that bow IMO.  

For hunting, just slip on those retro camo limb covers and go kill something.

Your praise is just going to make it tough for us novices to now find this bow at discount prices...but if you didn't, some of us would not know about this sleeper.

I only have one of these at 66" and it does perform like a high priced custom.

   

   

 

Did they only make these in 66" and 63"?
Lon Scott

Offline Mojostick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2014, 08:37:00 PM »
69" too. I think many guys are still spooked by the glass color to buy them. Those of us reading here are tiny in number. The guys that love them typically hold onto them.

At some point I'm going to try hunting with the "standard" sea foam green because I'm really interested if deer can pick it up in the least. I already have a good name for the bow...Electric Lady Land.      ;)        :D

Offline Mojostick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2014, 09:11:00 PM »
I just want to clarify, since my pictures aren't great, this EXP bow has avocado green glass like the 1961 Kodiak Special (another super sleeper), not the typical sea foam green glass that the 1962 Kodiak Special and 1963 Grizzly made famous. It's hard to pick up when taking a quick picture on the porch, in the sun.

Offline Blackhawk

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3863
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2014, 09:20:00 PM »
It's possible that 1962 was the epitome of American craftsmanship.  It was a time when workers took pride in their work, whether it was bows or cars.

Was there a better production car than the '62 Chevy Impala?

   

or a better production bow than the '62 Kodiak?

 
Lon Scott

Offline 59Alaskan

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 2336
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2014, 09:42:00 PM »
Beatiful bows!!!  That's a stunning EXP Bob.  Wow!  I would hunt it but likely put limb covers on to protect the bow
TGMM Family of the Bow

"God has given us two hands, one to receive with and the other to give with.” - Billy Graham

Offline Larry m

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1006
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2014, 09:46:00 PM »
Lon
Is that looking out your front door and at the driveway. If so you are a lucky man. Looks all original and a two door none the less.
Good looking bow Bob and I agree one of the finer out of the Bear line. Yours is certainly a unique eye catcher. 29" draw and your at 39#. I have a 1966 36# Polar I matched up with some barreled woods spined in the low 40# with 5" shield fletch and 125 gn field points and it shoots very nice!! No doubt you are going to like it a lot!!!!!     [url=http://http://http://http://s291.photobucket.com/user/toxo-collector/media/Bears012_zpsc965a7aa.jpg.html]   [url=http://s291.photobucket.com/user/toxo-collector/media/Bears007_zps778b8679.jpg.html]   [/url] [/url]
Here is my 62 on the right. I think I may have shown you this before.

Offline Mojostick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2014, 09:47:00 PM »
Lon,
Chew on this. The 1959 Bear lineup is incredible. You have the 1959 Kodiak, Kodiak Special, Grizzly and Alaskan. All of those 1959 bows are among the pinnacle of vintage production bows. Of course, we all know that. And I own and love all of those bows.

However, let's stack up the 1962 lineup against the 1959 (and 1960) lineup. You have the 1962 Kodiak, perhaps the best Kodiak made (1961 might be better but for the common stress cracks), you have the 1962 Grizzly, in my opinion no doubt the best Grizzly made (but some are spooked by white glass), the 1962 Polar (sleeper alert), then you have the gem of gems, the 1962 Kodiak Special. I dunno, you be the judge, does 1962 beat out 1959?         ;)            :thumbsup:            :)

Offline Tyler C. Moore

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 523
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2014, 11:00:00 PM »
Wow these are all ma amazing bows . Mojostick you are asking some tough questions haha.

Having recently really jumped into the 60-62 bows I actually was lucky enough to just purchase a '61 KS and a '60 Kodiak.. Really couldn't be happier and can't wait to have them side by side !
Tyler C. Moore

Offline zepnut

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 530
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2014, 08:03:00 AM »
Have to agree with Mojostick. They are some of the better shooting Bear bows.
 

Offline 59Alaskan

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 2336
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #12 on: July 22, 2014, 08:29:00 AM »
For me...the 1962 Grizzly is the best year in terms of shooting and I have owned a least a couple of dozen Grizzlies from 1958-1975.  

I will have to say I was not a huge fan of the 1962 Kodiak I owned; however, I would be willing to revise my statement if anyone wants to convince me otherwise by sending me a nice LH one!  LOL.

The 1962 Kodiak Specials do appear to be phenomenal and perhaps one day a lefty will show up I can try.  I like the sea foam glass.  I think it's unique in a way and definitely fits the era.

The pics on this thread are wonderful!  Thanks to all of you for posting
TGMM Family of the Bow

"God has given us two hands, one to receive with and the other to give with.” - Billy Graham

Offline damascusdave

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3273
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #13 on: July 22, 2014, 10:40:00 PM »
So how many Kodiak Deluxes and Kodiak Special Deluxes were made in 1962?

DDave
I set out a while ago to reduce my herd of 40 bows...And I am finally down to 42

Offline Mojostick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #14 on: July 22, 2014, 11:35:00 PM »
I dunno. Since the Deluxe bows were such failures, I assume Bear learned to never make such a poor bow again. If one notices, Bear ran from the terrible Deluxe bows they made and did everything to make other bows archers could actually use.

Also notice, it's rare to have much stress in a '62 Kodiak, '62 Grizzly or '62 Kodiak Special. Most those bows have little to no stress issues. And delamination/blow up's, the utmost worst failure of a bow design, is non-existent in 1962 models. In the 1962 models, stress isn't nearly the factor it is as in other years.

It was only by odd rarity that cash value was assumed on the rare year that Bear made an albeit beautiful, but mostly useless, flawed 1960 DLX bows. If Winchester made a Model 70 that you couldn't fire because it might blow up, I bet it'd also have some value to some people.

I've looked into several 60KSD's from members here and I'm still open to getting one and will shoot it until it fails, but they still can't shoot as well as the 1962 Kodiak Special. They can't because the 62KS grip blows the 59/60 grip away. That and the '62 Kodiak Special won't delaminate in your hands, ever.

A different question is, how many Kodiak Deluxe bows and Kodiak Special Deluxe bows can one shoot every day? Weekly? Monthly? Yearly? How long can one leave a Deluxe strung while hunting year in and year out? How many animals can one kill with a Deluxe?

If a guy likes a wall hanger, that's fine by be. Enjoy it. Spend that cash on it. Hang it above your bed if one likes. But please don't claim some collector high ground about bows that can't be bows. A bow needs to be "bowed" to be a bow. An unstrung bow is just, well, an expensive historical stick. And that's cool, but they really aren't bows anymore, because they aren't strung and bowed. As stated before, my opinion is a bow unused is a useless bow. Bows were never meant to hang on a wall. Bows are meant to shoot arrows and kill things or at least shoot targets. A bow that can't be strung is like a vintage car without an engine. If one has wall hangers, enjoy them, but please don't compare them to working bows still in the field and getting better with age.

The 1960 Deluxe bows are most certainly not getting better with age, nor is their influence on traditional archery. More and more, the 1960 DLX's are seen as what could go wrong with a bow. The 1962 line up, on the other hand, is garnering more appreciation because hunters of that era actually would like to use them in the field.

While I'd love to shoot a 1960 KSD until it blows up, I know it'd never be the bow that a 1962 KS was in fact. Just my opinion and please all readers take it as just that.

Offline 59Alaskan

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 2336
Re: EXP 1962 Kodiak Special
« Reply #15 on: July 23, 2014, 07:32:00 AM »
I 100% agree that bows should be shot and used. Regarding 1962 improvements (which I also agree were many), the 1962 Kodiak I owned was painted green at the factory (not camo but the green to match the glass color used on them).  My understanding is that quite a few were painted but definitely not all.  I figured it was glass issues?
TGMM Family of the Bow

"God has given us two hands, one to receive with and the other to give with.” - Billy Graham

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©