3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Longbow question, HH vs Martin  (Read 529 times)

Offline riot1013

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 53
Longbow question, HH vs Martin
« on: January 20, 2008, 01:31:00 AM »
I have a Martin Mountaineer 68" longbow that pulls 75# at 27" and shoots a 640 gr arrow 175.  I ordered a Hill Wesley Special that should be @75# at 27" and 66" long.  Will the performance be similar?  I am thinking (hoping) the Hill may be a bit quicker.  What do you guys think?

Riot

Offline TheArc

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Longbow question, HH vs Martin
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2008, 01:42:00 AM »
The Martin's shorter limbs should be just a tad faster both bows being D style long bows. The Hill may be slightly smoother with the longer working limbs and have a bit less finger pinch though neither will really have any at your draw length or that of most folks under 30 inch draws. I have several of both makers bows but my Martins are R/D style so that is apples and oranges.
"And Moab, he lay us upon the band of the Canaanites, and yea, though the Hindus speak of karma, I implore you: give her a break." Rev. Clark Griswold

Offline Stone Knife

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
Re: Longbow question, HH vs Martin
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2008, 08:47:00 AM »
The Hill should be a little faster seeing it has shorter limbs, I read somewhere that the Wesley special is one of the faster bows that Howard Hill Archery makes. Regardless you have purchased a nice bow and it will bring you a lot of enjoyment.
Proverbs 12:27
The lazy do not roast any game,
but the diligent feed on the riches of the hunt.


John 14:6

Offline Bob Barnes

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 349
Re: Longbow question, HH vs Martin
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2008, 09:00:00 AM »
you'll like it...just had both bows and the Hill bow is as trim as a bow can be...nothing extra to add weight to the bow or limbs.  It has some reflex glued in as well and is pretty quick for that style.
enjoy.
Bob
"Hello, My name is Bob and I'm a BowAholic"

Offline riot1013

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 53
Re: Longbow question, HH vs Martin
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2008, 01:30:00 PM »
Thanks guys.  My Martin is one of the older Mountaineers (with the glass inserts for limb tip reinforcements rather than the overlays that they used in later production) and does not have reflex/deflex limbs.  They are fairly straight with about an inch of reflex if you were to lay the back flat against a wall.  My old Pioneer that I had about 8-9 years ago had what I would call a slight reflex/deflex design.  But it wasn't any faster, slower if I remember correctly.  But overall I am excited about the bow.  Bamboo and Cocobolo with clear glass, should be beautiful.

Riot

Offline HunterLawyer

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Longbow question, HH vs Martin
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2008, 02:31:00 PM »
Riot:

Howard Hill Archery says a rule of thumb for Hill bows is 115 + bow weight=fps. I don't know what arrow weight that is with. I'd be interested to know how your bow chronos,at least for academic purposes and to test their belief. I have a 69@29 that I will chrono this weekend, and a 50@29 Wesley Special takedown that is coming soon. I hope. Not that I am eagerly awaiting it or anything...

Of course, as my brother said to me, why do I care what it chronos, as long as it gets the job done? The speed isn't exactly the point of longbow shooting (but it is good to know).

Either the Martin or the Hill will take care of business. Shoot what feels best to you.

Bill
Howard Hill Wesley Special 68", 55#@29 takedown
Howard Hill Halfbreed 70", 70#@29
Robertson Mystical 70", 66#@29
Chekmate Hunter II 60", 60#@28
Howard Hill recurve 66", 51#@28
Pearson Colt recurve 62", 52#@28

Online Orion

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8253
  • Contributing Member
Re: Longbow question, HH vs Martin
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2008, 02:37:00 PM »
Your Mountaineer has a bit more set back than the Hill will have, but the shorter length, and the bamboo limb cores should make the Hill faster.  IMO, bamboo is faster than the same weight wood core.

Offline TheArc

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Longbow question, HH vs Martin
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2008, 07:41:00 PM »
Oops I got mixed up on which bow had the longer limbs. So I claim the duuhoh right to reverse my assessment:)
"And Moab, he lay us upon the band of the Canaanites, and yea, though the Hindus speak of karma, I implore you: give her a break." Rev. Clark Griswold

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©