INFO: Trad Archery for Bowhunters



Author Topic: Low-maintenance: D2 vs 440c - preview pic added  (Read 690 times)

Offline Rusty Snuffers

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 439
Low-maintenance: D2 vs 440c - preview pic added
« on: January 05, 2012, 02:47:00 PM »
I've been asked to assemble a knife for my nephew and the blades I'm looking at come in either 440c or D2 tool steel.  Which of the two would require less maintenance?  I envision the knife sitting in the glove box of his Jeep Wrangler (in a sheath, of course) while driving through 3' of mud and water...    ;)  

Thanks in advance,
Rusty
Black Widow PSA V 48# @27"
Samick Deermaster T/D 50# @28"
Dale Dye Good Medicine 50# @27"
"All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost."  JRR Tolkien

Offline easyup

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 139
Re: Low-maintenance: D2 vs 440c - preview pic added
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2012, 11:14:00 AM »
440C should have ~50% more chromium than D-2 and so should be much more resistant to moisture but the cutting edge will need more maintenance (sharpening).

Offline TheBigRedArcher

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 255
Re: Low-maintenance: D2 vs 440c - preview pic added
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2012, 03:16:00 PM »
In my opinion D2. it is very close to the level of chromium that makes a steel "stainless" ~13% according to the steel chart provided online by spyderco knives. All the knives I make are D2 and I have never had an issue with them rusting. You could always put a light coat of some various type of rust preventer on the blade for long term storage, I use Boeshield T9.

Again, just my $.02

Post pics of the blade when done.


TBRA

Offline amar911

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2860
Re: Low-maintenance: D2 vs 440c - preview pic added
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2012, 10:53:00 PM »
I would pick D-2 over 440C almost every time, given the choice. Some of what is marketed as 440C today does not seem to be the same alloy or quality as the 440C steel used in the past. But if corrosion resistance is one of the most important factors, a good 440C blade might fit the purpose better.

Allan
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline 75diagg

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 170
Re: Low-maintenance: D2 vs 440c - preview pic added
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2012, 06:20:00 AM »
D2  can rust          proper 440C  will not....

Offline Ringneck

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 978
Re: Low-maintenance: D2 vs 440c - preview pic added
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2012, 12:38:00 PM »
As a test I have left blood on my D-2 blades for 3 days and had no discoloration. If I was going to to leave my knife in a bucket of saltwater I would choose the 440C. In daily use I don't think it matters one bit.

Offline Rusty Snuffers

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 439
Re: Low-maintenance: D2 vs 440c - preview pic added
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2012, 04:30:00 PM »
Thanks for all the input, guys.  Because my sister asked me to order the blades the same day I posted the original question, I chose 440c (simply because it SAID stainless).  The blade is one of Jantz's US-made blanks, so I'm hoping the quality is high and the 440c is "proper".  I can tell you it FEELS really nice with the micarta scales attached and pinned.  We'll just have to see how well it holds up.   ;)

I'll post pics once I have it buffed and ready for its photo shoot.

Oh ok... here's a sneak peek.   :D

 
Thanks again,
Rusty
Black Widow PSA V 48# @27"
Samick Deermaster T/D 50# @28"
Dale Dye Good Medicine 50# @27"
"All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost."  JRR Tolkien

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©