Author Topic: Holmegaard question?  (Read 4322 times)

Offline Springbuck

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Re: Holmegaard question?
« Reply #20 on: October 09, 2008, 01:35:00 AM »
I have done a lam Holmegaard, although they haven't been pretty.  I lammed up a boofloo and black locust blank with a short power lam at the handle.  I added long reverse-wedges through the outer limbs.  I was trying to make it so the thickening of the limb happened just before the limbs narrow in side to side width, but the wedges were too thin and too gradually tapered.  I had to add another set just like them under the backing, which was linen cloth.

  I glued it up with just a tiny bit of reflex only in the skinny part of the limb.  It shot very well and was really easy to tiller.  The inner limbs were parallel in thickness and width, about 2", and the stiff ends were just a bit more than 1/3 the limb length.

  Unfortunately I killed it trying to mess with it, as I often do, and i have been scheming an all wood, no linen version, as soon as I get to it.

  In the meantime, I made an elm copy, but it came in low weight.
42% of statistics are made up, and the other 62% are inaccurate.

Offline RayMO

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 531
Re: Holmegaard question?
« Reply #21 on: October 09, 2008, 08:46:00 AM »
I have not seen this thread before.
Wow! Those bows are really something.

Offline Springbuck

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Re: Holmegaard question?
« Reply #22 on: October 18, 2008, 01:59:00 AM »
I was gonna tell Glenn that I also especially liked the bow on the far right in the picture.  It looks almost like a Holemegaard/Sudbury hybrid, very eye-catching, and I bet it shoots very quiet in the hand.  Congratulate your friend for me..
42% of statistics are made up, and the other 62% are inaccurate.

Online Pat B

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 15027
Re: Holmegaard question?
« Reply #23 on: October 18, 2008, 10:30:00 AM »
Beautiful bows Glenn. That is an excellent shape and style for hunting.     Pat
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline vanislebowyer

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 27
Re: Holmegaard question?
« Reply #24 on: June 21, 2009, 02:37:00 PM »
i might be the guy bernie was talking about who made osage/hickory bows on that other site...i'm radius on primitive archer...i love the holmegaard that i made then, i just recently traded it for a great painting that my friend robert ives created...
dumb as a bag of hammers

Offline dutchwarbow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 326
Re: Holmegaard question?
« Reply #25 on: June 22, 2009, 07:22:00 AM »
stringstretcher, ask yourself a few questions;

- what is a holmegaard design?
- why couldn't you make a laminated holmegaard?

let me answer these for you;
- we usually call a bow a holmegaard when it's got long, stiff, narrow tips. these can run fluently into the bending part(like the 4th bow in glenns picture), or pretty abrupt, with a so called 'shoulder' like the first and third.

- I don't see any reason why you can't add this feature to a bbo.

Nick
in the old days religion had it's use to keep nations together. Today, religion tears nations apart.

Nick

Offline bigcountry

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1027
Re: Holmegaard question?
« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2009, 06:00:00 PM »
All I can say is after seeing your fine bamboo and IPE bows in Baltimre, I can't wait until next year to see your laminated holmegaaard

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©