Author Topic: Next question,, Carbon  (Read 542 times)

Offline Hill Hunter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 396
Next question,, Carbon
« on: October 23, 2012, 04:38:00 PM »
Getting ready to try my next bow, will try a take down this time, but it seems I am already looking down the road to the next one, which raises a question.
if using Carbon on back or back and belly, what kind of weight change is there if swapping carbon for a strip of .040 glass?
Ps 8:3 ¶ When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained;
 4 What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?

Offline Hill Hunter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 396
Re: Next question,, Carbon
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2012, 05:40:00 PM »
anyone??
Ps 8:3 ¶ When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained;
 4 What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?

Offline Mike Most

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 927
Re: Next question,, Carbon
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2012, 06:31:00 PM »
I am not a carbon expert, but I would put it in as a power lam. or swap out a parallel lam and leave the glass on the outside.  Maybe someone else will chime in....  :confused:
"It Shall be Life" (Ten Bears to Josie Wales)
------------------                Michael Most-Adkins Texas

Offline Dan Bonner

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 463
Re: Next question,, Carbon
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2012, 11:29:00 PM »
That's a tough question. There are many types of carbon layups. The best stuff I have used I have had custom made. I get it from ACP in California. I use .036 uni directional. It will add about 20% to the draw weight for a carbon back. Double it for back and belly on my rd lb.  Carbon only helps if it is used as a skin. Put it in the stack between glass and it's a high dollar racing stripe. I would not bother with it on a recurve. It doesn't like compound bends. It doesn't like compression either but it loves tension. Best results I have had are using it on the  back only. Double carbons I have built have been super fast but tend to blow apart at the belly. Interesting you would ask this because I just  built a carbon back 1 pc today. First carbon rig I've built in 3 years. Good luck.

Bonner

Offline psychmonky

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 490
Re: Next question,, Carbon
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2012, 07:17:00 AM »
Not to high-jack the thread, but has anybody tried it as a backing on a wood bow? Lots of places sell 1/16" unidirectional carbon and I thought it would be a cool backing.
If you're gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough.

Offline Hill Hunter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 396
Re: Next question,, Carbon
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2012, 12:43:00 PM »
Thanks Dan;
this will help, just building my form for a RD take down, after building one in Glass to test the design I would like to try one carbon backed.
Ps 8:3 ¶ When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained;
 4 What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?

Offline Dan Bonner

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 463
Re: Next question,, Carbon
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2012, 07:00:00 PM »
Psychmonkey,
I'd be real careful with a uni that's that thick. It will add a TON to the draw weight. I doubt it would work well with an all wood build. It will probably crush the belly wood with massive compression and cause the bow to explode!

Offline psychmonky

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 490
Re: Next question,, Carbon
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2012, 08:07:00 PM »
...and I thought "well 1/8 is Prolly way too thick...ill bet 1/16 is prolly perfect." See how little I know?
If you're gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough.

Offline HMlongbow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 427
Re: Next question,, Carbon
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2012, 09:05:00 PM »
If you are using carbon I don't use anything over .022 thick.  I have tryed the .030 carbon and the limb snapped in half and then no good.  The max you can safely use I would say is the .022 and use it under the veneer and not between the cores as then it becomes a high priced filler with no results.  I have found that using carbon adds about 14% in performance to a bow.  The best results with carbon is in the recovery of limbs.  This is what carbon is best for.  The smoothness and it also is lighter than most woods so that is lighter limb.
I hope this helps

Offline Hill Hunter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 396
Re: Next question,, Carbon
« Reply #9 on: October 26, 2012, 09:18:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by hitmanlongbows:
If you are using carbon I don't use anything over .022 thick.  I have tryed the .030 carbon and the limb snapped in half and then no good.  The max you can safely use I would say is the .022 and use it under the veneer and not between the cores as then it becomes a high priced filler with no results.  I have found that using carbon adds about 14% in performance to a bow.  The best results with carbon is in the recovery of limbs.  This is what carbon is best for.  The smoothness and it also is lighter than most woods so that is lighter limb.
I hope this helps
so you are using it under the veneers instead of on the back?
I knew in the core was not where I wanted it but I do like the idea of it under the veneer if possible.
Ps 8:3 ¶ When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained;
 4 What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©