« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Primitive/Classic strings v Dacron?  (Read 296 times)

Offline BrokenArrows

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 45
Primitive/Classic strings v Dacron?
« on: January 04, 2013, 12:43:00 PM »
How do hemp, linen, etc strings compare to Dacron when it comes to temporary/permanent elongation (stretch/creep)?
Logged
>>>>----->

Offline rainman

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1221
Re: Primitive/Classic strings v Dacron?
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2013, 05:16:00 PM »
Good linen string is stronger and has less stretch than Dacron.  I have not used Hemp.
Logged
Semper Fidelis
Dan Raney

Offline ChrisM

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1889
Re: Primitive/Classic strings v Dacron?
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2013, 12:18:00 PM »
I have wondered the same thing.  If Linen is stronger and has less stretch then why did people swap to Dacron?
Logged
Gods greatest command:  Love your neighbor as you love yourself.

Offline Traxx

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 615
Re: Primitive/Classic strings v Dacron?
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2013, 08:42:00 PM »
Because Linnen has a habit,of just lettin go and breaking,without much sign of wear n tear.Folks used to just change the strings out after so much use,just to avoid it happening.
Logged
Target archery is seeing how far away you can get and still hit the bull's eye. Bowhunting is seeing how close you can get and never miss your mark.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©