Author Topic: Let's talk core lam's  (Read 407 times)

Offline twitchstick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3136
Let's talk core lam's
« on: January 03, 2016, 12:58:00 AM »
I bought some bamboo and some osage boards. I had not thought about doing Trilams at first but I have being seeing some post on doing them. I'm just looking for some opinions on core lams. How much do the benefit? pro's and con's, kinds of woods? Any thoughts or theory's you have would be appreciated

Offline takefive

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1098
Re: Let's talk core lam's
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2016, 02:35:00 AM »
The two main reasons I use core lams is first, the osage boards I buy are 5/8" thick and when I rip them into two 1/4" thick lams, I need a core lam or a long power lam to add to the stack to give me the thickness I need at the handle and past the fades.  Second, it's easier to get the R/D shape with 3 lams instead of two.
I've used hard maple, walnut, cherry, and red elm for cores and haven't noticed any real difference performance wise between them. They're all in the same ballpark for SG and I would imagine that the tension and compression work is done by the back and belly lam anyway.
It's hard to make a wooden bow which isn't beautiful, even if it's ugly.
-Tim Baker

Offline mikkekeswick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 988
Re: Let's talk core lam's
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2016, 03:17:00 AM »
Yes it makes little to no difference.
Common sense would tell you that low s.g. cores would perform better but I haven't really seen the evidence with the chrono.

Offline monterey

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 4248
Re: Let's talk core lam's
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2016, 09:41:00 AM »
Can one go too low in SG with the core lam?

I would not use balsa, but as an example of extremes, would it hold a risk of failure?

Like Mike says, common sense says that a lighter core wood should perform better, but can it get too light (weak)?  I have this picture in my mind of a very light core crushed between the back and belly!
Monterey

"I didn't say all that stuff". - Confucius........and Yogi Berra

Offline takefive

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1098
Re: Let's talk core lam's
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2016, 02:56:00 PM »
That's a good question, Monterey.  I have an Eastern Red Cedar board that I've thought of using as a core lam.  As light as it is, I've wondered if I'd have to go a bit thicker than I would with maple, etc.
This stuff is feather light, but pretty elastic and pretty good in compression.
It's hard to make a wooden bow which isn't beautiful, even if it's ugly.
-Tim Baker

Offline mikkekeswick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 988
Re: Let's talk core lam's
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2016, 03:39:00 AM »
All a core has to resist is shear. Not tension  or compression.
I've had core failures. African padauk being the last one. The grain wasn't the greatest and it was in an elb, hickory back, ipe belly. Started hearing the dreaded 'tick....tick' getting close to full draw...could not find a problem...it was the next day when I came back to it I noticed cracks running right through the core for almost the full length of the core.  
There are reasons why maple is a great core wood!

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©