JC: Actual holding weight and stored energy aren't the same thing. A newer fast compound will be 60 lbs, peak weight, and an older, moderate cam or round wheel compound will also have a 60lb peak weight. However, because the newer bow gets to peak quicker and holds it longer (little valley), it stores more energy. It might also lose less energy due to hysteresis (friction) than the older bow (more effecient). That's why you actually do as much work to pull the newer bow at 60lbs as you do to pull the older bow at 70lbs. There are only a few things that can make one 53lb recurve faster than another of the same weight: 1. It can be more effecient,i.e., delivers more of the stored energy to the arrow. 2. It has a longer power stroke, which is usually governed by either brace height, or amount of reflex/deflex in the riser. 3. It catches weight quicker and holds more (a higher percentage) of the peak weight longer. I know many people post about how the new bow shoots just as fast as the old one at a lesser poundage. The only way that can be is that it stores the same energy, and that energy can only be stored when you pull it. You perceive it as "easier" to pull because it has lower peak weight, but you did the same amount of work overall, because you generated the same energy. Unless the newer bow is delivering a substantially greater percentage of stored energy to the arrow (dynamic efficiency), you do the same work to pull either bow. I don't see how this principle can be different for a traditional bow as compared to a compound. JMHO, Paul.