3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....  (Read 327 times)

Offline skychief

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 450
2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« on: July 18, 2008, 10:58:00 PM »
How do these shafts compare to each other in spine and grains/inch?   I am currently using 30" 2013's with 125 grain heads and they fly very well (100 grain hex heads fly great on these shafts too).   I am just curious about 1916s in comparison as I (like many here) am looking for perfection!    My thinking is that the 1916s would penetrate better if they are nearly as heavy.   I can NOT find this information on Easton's website, by the way and appreciate your help!    Thanks much, Skychief.

Offline SpankyNeal

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1264
Re: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2008, 11:12:00 PM »
The 2013's are listed at 9.8 gpi and spine .460 while the 2016 list at 10.6 gpi and spine .530 - hope this helps ya out.

Regards.....Spanky
Ken "Spanky" Neal

4 Sunset Hills and counting!

66" 59# "White Dragon"
65" 56# "El Tigre"
67" 47# "Quiet Places"
66" 57# "Lionheart"

"Speed is vital, however it is absolutely worthless when you exchange it for stability and accuracy"...John Schulz

Offline tacomadm18

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 19
Re: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2008, 11:15:00 PM »
I too have been playing with with shafts,,,

* I've always liked cedar,,, they just seem to fly well for me,,,,

* I've never liked carbon for my longbow,,, just couldn't get them to feel right,,, maybe it was just me,,,

* I have however just started playing with Easton Legacy's,,,,,
--- I end up with 2016's,,, 29" long,,, 125gr,,, 3 5" LW feathes,,,, with a wrap,,, they are about 485gr,,,,, maybe a little heavy for my setup, but they fly very well and feel great come off the bow,,,, I think the rule of thumb is 7-8gr per pulling pound,,,, I like around 9-10gr per pulling pound,,,,,,

glen

Offline TXRED

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 224
Re: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2008, 11:23:00 PM »
According to Easton's 2006 catalog:
1916 xx75 shaft weight-10gpi,spine-0.623
2013 xx75 shaft weight-9gpi,spine-.610
Hope that's what your looking for.If you need any more info from this catalog,just ask!
John
    Too young for Medicare,
    Too old for women to care

Offline SpankyNeal

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1264
Re: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2008, 11:42:00 PM »
Ooops, thought you meant 2016! The info I posted is what's listed on Eastons current website shaft selector. Maybe they are measuring at different centers now since the info is not the same as TXRED's. I like 2016's, but also use 1916's in my lighter bows.
Ken "Spanky" Neal

4 Sunset Hills and counting!

66" 59# "White Dragon"
65" 56# "El Tigre"
67" 47# "Quiet Places"
66" 57# "Lionheart"

"Speed is vital, however it is absolutely worthless when you exchange it for stability and accuracy"...John Schulz

Offline skychief

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 450
Re: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2008, 12:02:00 AM »
Thanks for all the information guys.   So, in the end, do you think the 1916's will work as well as my 2013's?   Maybe with 100 grains up front?   Could I expect more penetration with the 1916's?   Thanks again, Skychief.

Offline sweet old bill

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 505
Re: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2008, 05:59:00 AM »
I am using 1916 cut to 29 1/2 long, 125 gr point or BH. the bow I am shooting  is a checkmate firebird model 49 lbs at 28 inch draw... so for me the 1916 fly great...

what is your bow and lbs at 28 inch and your actual draw length...I do think you will get a slight increase in peneration with the 1916 due to the increase in total arrow weight..
you should see how I use to shoot
Sand dune archers Myrtle beach SC
Senior archers of Oneonta NY

Offline mike g

  • Tradbowhunter
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *
  • Posts: 2301
Re: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2008, 10:35:00 AM »
I would go with the 1916 it has a thicker wall and will be more durable....
"TGMM Family of the Bow"

Online Magnum in Ms

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 293
Re: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2008, 06:10:00 PM »
If you want more weight than the 1916, try a 2016 with a 145 or 175gr point.
Every one is ignorant its just on different subjects

Offline Shawn Leonard

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 7837
Re: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2008, 09:59:00 PM »
What Mike g said! Shawn
Shawn

Offline skychief

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 450
Re: 2013 vs. 1916 ? Quick question please....
« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2008, 12:40:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by sweet old bill:
I am using 1916 cut to 29 1/2 long, 125 gr point or BH. the bow I am shooting  is a checkmate firebird model 49 lbs at 28 inch draw... so for me the 1916 fly great...

what is your bow and lbs at 28 inch and your actual draw length...I do think you will get a slight increase in peneration with the 1916 due to the increase in total arrow weight..
My recurve is 50# @ 28".   My draw length is 26 1/2".    Thanks for the help!

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©