I know the issue of longbow vs. recurve has been hashed over ad nauseum. Each has its advocates here. I know also that the way each contributes to "hand shock" has been equally debated. Having been solidly in the longbow camp for a while now, I agree wholeheartedly with the fact that properly gripping a longbow ensures it has no more handshock than anything else. I'm not interested in igniting a debate about that, again. If gripped properly, I've proven to myself that my longbow is as smooth as silk on release.
HOWEVER, I'm getting old, and my joints are really starting to bark at me. I find that on those occasions where I DON'T grip properly, or something goes wrong in my form, even for a single shot, I am painfully chastised by my longbow in my shoulder and elbow. I can shoot beautifully for 10 shots, but it's that 1 where I let down on my form that beats me up. And it beats me bad enough that I pay for quite a while thereafter. It's affecting my accuracy, just like recoil does on a gun - I find myself starting to flinch - fearing the spanking.
SO, my question is - would switching to a recurve minimize the repercussions of periodic lapses in form? When your form slips with a recurve, does it spank you as badly as a longbow?
Just to reiterate - I'm not asking about when everything goes well, which has more shock. I'm asking about when things go bad -your grip is wrong, you have a bad release - your form just plain goes south - will a recurve be kinder in THAT case?
BillJ