First of all, Easton's chart is not inaccurate, we use it inaccurately. The chart shows the actual deflection at 28", with a 1.94# weight.
There's nothing inaccurate about that. When we read it we need to understand how to apply it to our bows.
Now, if your bow is cut at or past center, you can use a little heavier spine than those that are not. If you use an elevated rest, you can sometimes use a wider variety of spines. The bottom line is a 2018 has a deflection of .420 at 28" length. That puts it in the 60+ poundage range for a 28" arrow. You would need to add a good bit of front weight, "unless" your longbow is cut past centershot.
Spines, and spine charts, are simply a starting point, and have always been such. There are so many variables that create dynamics in a bow that one must try different spines to see what the bow will tolerate. Example: I have a 42#, 1961 Bear Polar, 66" AMO length. I have an elevated rest on it and a TS-1 string. I shoot 28", 2016 arrows from it, 125/130 grain points with perfect flight. They should be too stiff by the chart....470 deflection.
Take five guys, with the same bow/weight/length of draw, stand them side by side, and they will struggle to be able to shoot the same arrow effectively. Individual dynamics will turn those into five different bows. The human equation.
One thing I like about archery is the individualism that is required. There is no "black and white" chart that will fit everyone. Same with brace height....same with nock height...same with string type and strand numbers.
Try the 2018. They will probably be too stiff. If you don't want an ultra-heavy arrow then you will probably need to get into a 1916. Or, a 2016 with maybe 160 grains up front. You see you are the one who will dictate what that bow will shoot, and you are the one who needs to experiment. Personally, I think a 2018 loaded up front is going to be on the line of dimishing returns. You have to decide, however.