3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?  (Read 943 times)

Offline Butch Speer

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1176
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #20 on: October 26, 2009, 10:04:00 PM »
I shoot a 52 in. Bear Kodiak Magnum & a 60 in. Bear T/D Hunter. For me either works fine at hunting distances. I don't target shoot so it's good enough for me.
God Bless

Butch the Yard Gnome

67 Bear Kodiak Hunter 58" 48@28
73 Bear Grizzly 58" 47@ 28
74 Bear Kodiak Hunter 45@28
Shakespeare Necedah 58" 45@28

Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much.
- Erastus Wiman

Offline Zradix

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 5798
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #21 on: October 27, 2009, 12:18:00 AM »
Ive seen the stalker. It is a clone of my old herters in shape. Pete ward has a good review of one
If some animals are good at hunting and others are suitable for hunting, then the Gods must clearly smile on hunting.~Aristotle

..there's more fun in hunting with the handicap of the bow than there is in hunting with the sureness of the gun.~ F.Bear

Offline Tom Leemans

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2339
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #22 on: October 27, 2009, 09:22:00 AM »
In the mean time, here are instructions for correcting the limb twist.
  fixing limb twist by Ric Anderson
Got wood? - Tom

Offline Zradix

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 5798
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #23 on: October 27, 2009, 09:25:00 AM »
I honestly don't know. The bow I have lets me draw 28 3/4". Its a short bow and it stops there. I'm 6'2" 230#'s. Pretty average arm length, maybe slightly longer than normal. I just had to shoot what I had.
If some animals are good at hunting and others are suitable for hunting, then the Gods must clearly smile on hunting.~Aristotle

..there's more fun in hunting with the handicap of the bow than there is in hunting with the sureness of the gun.~ F.Bear

Offline reddogge

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4926
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #24 on: October 27, 2009, 09:32:00 AM »
Actually to quote an author Anthony Camera "the shorter bow will require greater force to be drawn to a specific draw length but will tend to shoot an arrow faster than a longer bow."
Traditional Bowhunters of Maryland
Heart of Maryland Bowhunters
NRA
Mayberry Archers

Offline Zradix

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 5798
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #25 on: October 27, 2009, 10:19:00 AM »
Thanks for the how to. Guess I'm takin a bath tonite1!
If some animals are good at hunting and others are suitable for hunting, then the Gods must clearly smile on hunting.~Aristotle

..there's more fun in hunting with the handicap of the bow than there is in hunting with the sureness of the gun.~ F.Bear

Offline mustoffa

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #26 on: October 28, 2009, 09:24:00 PM »
shooting a shorter bow is harder .theres alot of reason usally the sight window is smaller you have to cant the bow more to shoot them well finger pinch not as forgiving just a lot of things
vernon thompson

Offline xtrema312

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3163
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #27 on: October 28, 2009, 10:12:00 PM »
I shoot a 56" mojo at 29 3/4" draw.  It is the best shooting bow I have had.  I have had curves up to 62" and LB's up to 66". A lot of it depends on the bow.
1 Timothy 4:4(NKJV)
For every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be refused if it is received with thanksgiving.

Firefly Long Bow  James 4:14
60" MOAB 54@29 James 1:17

Michigan Longbow Association

Offline KentuckyTJ

  • SPONSOR
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8651
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #28 on: October 28, 2009, 10:37:00 PM »
I've owned long bows and short. I personally like a shorter bow. I think it has to do more with the bow. A well made short bow is no harder to shoot than a longer bow. I have a relatively short draw at 27" and have found three short bows that shoot very well at my draw. I have a 56" Morrison Cheyenne that is an awesome bow. I also have a 58" Schafer Silvertip that is equally as good. I also had a 58" KajikaStik by Whisperstik that also could handle being short with ease. Very smooth to draw with no hand shock and hit where you were aiming. Just great consistent shooters all of these.
www.zipperbows.com
The fulfillment of your hunt is determined by the amount of effort you put into it  >>>---->

Offline George D. Stout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3467
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #29 on: October 29, 2009, 01:11:00 AM »
I don't consider bows 56 or 58 inches as short. I would say a short recurve is 52 inches and under.  And what do we call a 60 or 62 inch bow?
They aren't short, and they aren't really long; so are they medium bows, or medium long, or kinda, sorta short.

The bow needs to satisfy the guy pulling the string, for the purpose in which he intends to use it.  For my draw, just a tad under 28",  I like a 58" bow for hunting.  If I'm going to the field range, I'll probably take a recurve over 62" and maybe even 66".  The longer ones are more comfortable over a long shooting period....at least to me.  We are talking recurves here.  I like longbows to be long....  66 to 68 inches.

For many years, many years ago, we shot those 52" rascals and did very well with them.  We didn't realize they were hard to shoot 8^).

Offline Curtis Haden

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 620
Re: Are short recurves really harder to shoot?
« Reply #30 on: October 29, 2009, 01:38:00 AM »
You might check these out.  Mike and Brent are both Trad Gang Sponsers, and the Black Mountain Bows have gotten good reviews from everyone I've heard from.

  http://www.dryadbows.com/blackmountain/index.htm  

The three piece isn't showing up on the website yet, but it's a dandy looking little bow!  54" nock-to-nock.

  http://tradgang.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=079763;p=1

I'm personally a fan of longer bows, but I'd sure like to get my hands on one of those Shamans!
Rose Oak Ace 41@28
Super Shrew Gold 42@28
Black Widow PCH-X 40@28
Toelke Pika 43@28
_ _ _

A subtle play on words is better than a poke in the eye.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©