3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Hill and Low Stretch String  (Read 422 times)

Online Rick Wiltshire

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 715
Hill and Low Stretch String
« on: December 16, 2009, 12:50:00 PM »
I know that Craig does not recommend it - but any of you shoot a Hill, without tip overlays, with a low stretch string?  If so what are your thoughts?

Offline Dick in Seattle

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1673
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2009, 01:04:00 PM »
Yep... goes with the spoiler I welded to the back of my classic MG.


Seriously, why are you shooting a Hill if you're struggling to keep up with modern developments?   I went through something similar and even tried a carbon lammed Hill, but it just didn't feel right.  It's contrary to the nature of the beast.   I decided the idea isn't to see what a Hill or American Flatbow can be made to be today, but to see what it was like to shoot one as Howard et al shot them back in the day.

That said, these bows, especially those that don't have the inserts or overlays (and Howard was adamantly against both) shouldn't be used with skinny strings.   Aside from the issue of lack of stretch, i.e. shock, these bows have very narrow tips and the skinny, abrasive strings will eat into them fairly quickly.  You can pad the loops, but that's a pain.   Of course, you do gain about 6 fps, but the bow gets noisier.   You can quiet it with silencers, but they cost you about 6 fps.

Okay, I guess I'm done... still haven't had my morning coffee so I'm feeling kind of ornery.   Sorry 'bout that....  8^)
Dick in Seattle

"It ain't how well the bow you shoot shoots, it's how well you shoot the bow you shoot."

Offline SpankyNeal

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1264
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2009, 01:09:00 PM »
My Tembo does not have overlays and I asked Craig point blank about it. He said it would not be a problem. I use a padded loop D97 and have a couple thousand shots through it along with two broken nock dry fires - not so much as a stress crack in the finish! Other bowyers of Hill style bows, like Steve Turay and Nate Steen provide FF strings with their bows without overlays so obviously have no worries about it either. I'm a firm believer in modern strings on these bows, and not for the speed gain, but for the decrease in shock and vibration. Howards linen strings actually had less stretch than FF. Some folks prefer the B50 and that's just fine as we're all different, but I see no advantage to it in the shooting i've done with a lot of different Hill style bows. I've also found that mine are actually quieter with the D97 than dacron!

Ken   :archer:
Ken "Spanky" Neal

4 Sunset Hills and counting!

66" 59# "White Dragon"
65" 56# "El Tigre"
67" 47# "Quiet Places"
66" 57# "Lionheart"

"Speed is vital, however it is absolutely worthless when you exchange it for stability and accuracy"...John Schulz

Offline Bjorn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 8789
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2009, 01:50:00 PM »
I use skinny D97 with padded loops on my self bows with or without overlays-LB and RC-no problems.
Not making recommendations-do your own research.   :readit:

Offline Jason Jelinek

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 485
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2009, 01:55:00 PM »
I only use FF on bows with tip overlays that have rounded string grooves.  I don't like shooting any type of string on a bow that doesn't have rounded string grooves.

Honestly Dick, FF behaves more like linen than B50.  I don't shoot a Hill to shoot just like Howard did back in the day.  It shooot Hill bows because they are quiet, simple to use and don't take up much space!  That does not mean I won't push the edge of design within the constraints of a straight limb bow.

I'm even planning on building a Hill style bow with ACS limbs.  If carbon was a little cheaper I'd build one with it.

Offline straitera

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3860
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2009, 01:56:00 PM »
Just got a heavy Hill w/D-97 string. It worries me much; but, I can't miss with it. Any padding how to's you'd recommend? Or, do I just wrap the loop with leather?
Buddy Bell

Trad is 60% mental & about 40% mental.

Offline Greg Skinner

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 279
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2009, 02:13:00 PM »
I have a Tembo blank (57#@27) that I finished, including adding tip overlays.  I have used an 8 strand DF97 string (padded to 16 strands) for almost a year and shot hundreds of arrows through it without the least problem. I like the quietness, softness and lack of shock using this setup and see absolutely no reason to change anything.  When I got my first blank back in 2002 I asked Craig then about the use of low-stretch string and he said the wedge in the tips would allow use of those strings even without tip overlays.  I added tip overlays to that bow, anyway, and shot it for a couple of years with DF97 until it got burned in a house fire.  Never had any problems with it either. I also have a St. Charles yew TD (staight limb HH style) that was built without tip overlays back in 1991.  I asked Jay about using DF97 on it and he said it was OK. So I've been shooting it for over a year as well - no problem. I always pad the loops with DF97 to 16 strand thickness. No creep, good speed, quiet, durable - what's not to like?
And in the end of our exploring we shall return to the place where we started and know that place for the first time.

Offline JRY309

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4383
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2009, 02:13:00 PM »
All of my Hill's have tip overlays and I shoot a padded loop D97 on all of them.I feel longbows with a deep core are not as easliy damaged by low stretch strings.Older thin limbed recurves are more easliy damaged by low stretch strings.

Online Ben Maher

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3752
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2009, 04:56:00 PM »
i've tried many types of string on my Hills and Hill stylebows . to get them quiet like dacron i have to add string silencers , so i just stick with dacron . and most importantly its cheaper !!!
ben
" All that is gold does not glitter , not all those who wander are lost "
J.R.R TOLKIEN

Online tippit

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6239
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2009, 06:46:00 PM »
I use 450+ on all my longbows from selfbows to to Hybrids.  I pad my loops and usually use an 8 strand sting.  As to more expensive than B50, I tend to switch strings to similar length bows and haven't worn out a 450+ string yet over years...Doc
TGMM Family of the Bow
VP of Consumption MK,LLC

Online frank bullitt

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2417
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2009, 08:23:00 PM »
Like Doc says, 450+! I have a a couple buddies in Idaho, I make strings for and they are Hill shooters, most of the bows are over 85lbs.

A longbow of the Hill or American style, has a deep, narrow core, limb. Also a straigth or set-back is not under the shooting stress, as say a highly reflexed limb.

If it's an older bow, check that there are no cracks or fractures in the tips. Just like splitting wood, if there is a wedge of force, it will open it up. Oh, and shoot heavy, as in arrow weight!

  :thumbsup:

Offline Ric O'Shay

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2143
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #11 on: December 16, 2009, 08:33:00 PM »
I just received a new carbon backed Wesley Special from Craig. I had him put water buff tips overlays on along with the carbon. I love the way it feels and shoots. This 55# bow is faster and quieter than my 58# Wesley Special that does not have carbon. That said, I have tried FF+ and B-50 on all of my Hills. The dacron is a little quieter, but other than that, there's not fifteen cents worth of difference in the two string types...IMHO.   :)
I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just.   - Thomas Jefferson

Online Rick Wiltshire

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 715
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #12 on: December 16, 2009, 11:02:00 PM »
Thanks to all who have shared their experiences.  Looks like guys shoot whatever they want for whatever reason they want.  Sounds like independent, traditional archery at its core.

Offline NomadArcher

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #13 on: December 17, 2009, 12:07:00 AM »
I have a 6 strand 450 plus string on my Cheetah, it is silent too. My string only weighs 60 gr. with silencers and a tied on nocking point.

The B50 string was 90-100 gr. heavier and had a lot of string vibration/noise and some hand shock too.

The modern material really makes a better shooting experience in my opinion.

Offline Mudd

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 12391
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #14 on: December 17, 2009, 06:29:00 AM »
I have a question. Thanks in advance for whatever information I gain.
 If I wanted to try some of the new string material but didn't want to invest in making my own, is it possible to buy a string for my Big 5 that would come with padded loops? Serving strings ranks right up there with making arrows to me.. Yuck!
Thanks again!
God bless,Mudd
Trying to make a difference
Psalm 37:4
Roy L "Mudd" Williams
TGMM- Family Of The Bow
Archery isn't something I do, it's who I am!
The road to "Sherwood" makes for an awesome journey.

Offline WESTBROOK

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3385
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2009, 06:45:00 AM »
Mine dont have overlays, but has tip wedges, I use skinny S4 with padded loops.

Shot a Hill with Dacron once, never again, FF makes it a new bow for the better.

Eric

Offline SpankyNeal

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1264
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #16 on: December 17, 2009, 09:05:00 AM »
Mudd, every string maker I know will padd the loops for you if you request it. Getting ready to try an 8 strand from SBD here real soon as i've heard nothing but good things about his taper padded loop strings. They're a sponsor here as well.

Ken
Ken "Spanky" Neal

4 Sunset Hills and counting!

66" 59# "White Dragon"
65" 56# "El Tigre"
67" 47# "Quiet Places"
66" 57# "Lionheart"

"Speed is vital, however it is absolutely worthless when you exchange it for stability and accuracy"...John Schulz

Offline far rider

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Hill and Low Stretch String
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2009, 11:11:00 PM »
Ok, I'm still in a learning curve with my Hills. So if I do have tip overlays, and have not modified my string nocks (ie rounded them), I can shoot something like D-97 on it IF I have the loops padded? Or am I missing the mark?
Noli rogare pro onia pauciora, rogate pro scapulas latiores.

I go afield with bent wood, stick and string in search of serenity  through my primal quest.

Venatôr

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©