3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Not very scientific penetration test.  (Read 172 times)

Offline Rank Bull

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Not very scientific penetration test.
« on: October 09, 2010, 08:47:00 PM »
I was shooting today at a new layered foam target and I figured i would try and see just how much difference poundage makes.  

So the arrow weighs about 600 grains and has pretty high foc and fly well out of both bows.

I shot the same arrows out of a 51#and 63# longbows. Each time the 63# bow would out penetrate the lighter bow by about .5 inches.  Not very much difference when you consider both arrows would penetrate over 14 inches into the target.

Anyway I thought it was kind of interesting. Has anyone had the same experience?

Offline Zradix

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 5798
Re: Not very scientific penetration test.
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2010, 09:15:00 PM »
shoot them through a chrono.
that might help you to understand.
If some animals are good at hunting and others are suitable for hunting, then the Gods must clearly smile on hunting.~Aristotle

..there's more fun in hunting with the handicap of the bow than there is in hunting with the sureness of the gun.~ F.Bear

Offline S.C. Hunter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1342
Re: Not very scientific penetration test.
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2010, 11:17:00 PM »
The lighter bow was more efficient because it was moving a greater weight in proportion to speed . The 51# bow was shooting 11.76 grains per pound and the 63# bow was shooting 9.52 grains per pound. I read in a article a few months ago that bow speed has to increase by a large percentage to make a difference when using a similiar weight arrow. The heavier bow would need a arrow weighing 740 grains to be as efficient as the lighter bow. The 740 grain arrow would give you 11.75 grains per pound. That's your difference. The best way to view this is a faster arrow without the mass will lose energy faster than a heavy slower moving arrow. You take a football sled have your running back at 200 lbs hit it with his 4.4 40 speed and your defensive lineman weighing 290 lbs with his 5.3 40 speed and see who moves that sled more.   :thumbsup:
USMC 82-86

  • Guest
Re: Not very scientific penetration test.
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2010, 11:20:00 PM »
Could be the arrow was straighter coming out of the lighter bow.

Offline Rank Bull

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Not very scientific penetration test.
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2010, 10:35:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by S.C. Hunter:
The lighter bow was more efficient because it was moving a greater weight in proportion to speed . The 51# bow was shooting 11.76 grains per pound and the 63# bow was shooting 9.52 grains per pound. I read in a article a few months ago that bow speed has to increase by a large percentage to make a difference when using a similiar weight arrow. The heavier bow would need a arrow weighing 740 grains to be as efficient as the lighter bow. The 740 grain arrow would give you 11.75 grains per pound. That's your difference. The best way to view this is a faster arrow without the mass will lose energy faster than a heavy slower moving arrow. You take a football sled have your running back at 200 lbs hit it with his 4.4 40 speed and your defensive lineman weighing 290 lbs with his 5.3 40 speed and see who moves that sled more.    :thumbsup:  
That actually makes sense. I'll have to compare the heavier arrows that I made up for the heavier bow to these arrows.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©