3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Fastflight pros vs cons  (Read 407 times)

Offline LBR

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4221
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #20 on: June 11, 2011, 08:18:00 AM »
I've never come across a bow I couldn't get quiet with a FF type string.  Heard a lot about it, had a few brought by my shop that "couldn't be quieted" that left quiet.  Some bows are noisier than others, and will be loud regardless...but most can be just as quiet or quieter with a FF type string.  

Again, how the string is made, how you tune, nock fit, silencer type and placement, etc. all make a difference.

One thing is you can't just swap from one string to a totally different one and expect to just string it up and go.  You'll have to re-tune, possibly swap arrows or point weights, to get the best results.

Chad

Offline Rob DiStefano

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 12245
  • Contributing Member
    • Cavalier Pickups
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #21 on: June 11, 2011, 09:17:00 AM »
if yer bow can handle a modern hmpe fiber string, then by all means, USE IT!  

it really makes absolutely no sense using dacron that will have lotsa stretch and creep.  

hmpe fiber (i.e. - fast flight, dynaflight, whatever) is not about limb/arrow speed, it's all about performance stability.

get yerself a custom hmpe bowstring and don't look back.   :thumbsup:
IAM ~ The only government I trust is my .45-70 ... and my 1911.

Offline BD

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 498
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #22 on: June 11, 2011, 09:32:00 AM »
With the bows I've used both on, all but one were considerably more quiet with FF. The only exception was a used Palmer that I just couldn't get quiet with any type of string/silencer combo. I sold it-it sounded like a .22 going off regardless of the string
BD

Offline ishoot4thrills

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3445
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #23 on: June 11, 2011, 09:35:00 AM »
What LBR and Rob said.

You gotta spend a little time to retune the bow after changing to a high performance string. Like said before, "you can't just swap from one string to a totally different one and expect to just string it up and go".

I have yet to find that a high performance string is noisier than dacron after I have spent the time to make adjustments where needed.

Heck, I find that I don't even need silencers on my Kanati with it's ten strand, D10 string with padded loops.   :thumbsup:
58" JK Traditions Kanati Longbow
Ten Strand D10 String
Kanati Bow Quiver
35/55 Gold Tip Pink Nugents @ 30"
3 X 5" Feathers
19.9% FOC
49# @ 26.75"
165 FPS @ 10.4 GPP (510 gr. hunting arrow)
171 FPS @ 9.7 GPP (475 gr. 3D arrow)
3 Fingers Under

Offline Rusty Snuffers

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 439
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #24 on: June 11, 2011, 09:46:00 AM »
The only drawback I saw when I switched the SBD string is that I had just bought the "right" arrows for my B50.     :banghead:   I noticed a significant increase in speed and the bow seemed a bit quieter with the SBD.

Just my $.02
Black Widow PSA V 48# @27"
Samick Deermaster T/D 50# @28"
Dale Dye Good Medicine 50# @27"
"All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost."  JRR Tolkien

Online TIM B

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1774
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #25 on: June 11, 2011, 11:06:00 AM »
Thanks for all the responses!!  I really appreciate it- I'm gettin FF and gettin it dialed in..  Only 73 days till I head west for elk- not that I'm countin haha

Offline frank bullitt

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2417
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #26 on: June 12, 2011, 10:00:00 PM »
First and Foremost, Fast Flight is a tradename of Brownell. Spectra is this product, of which is a creation of DuPont.

I have a p.p. when folks "blanket", the materials under this name!

Rob is right, when he calls them "hmpe' materials.

There is alot more to these materials than just "Fast"! Please take note.

Offline mattmcdonald

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #27 on: June 12, 2011, 10:07:00 PM »
there was a thread on here a while back about dry firing your bow and most bows that got damaged from dry fires used fast flight strings it might be worth trying to recover that thread and read on it a little

Offline Javi

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 704
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #28 on: June 12, 2011, 10:09:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by frank bullitt:
First and Foremost, Fast Flight is a tradename of Brownell. Spectra is this product, of which is a creation of DuPont.

I have a p.p. when folks "blanket", the materials under this name!

Rob is right, when he calls them "hmpe' materials.

There is alot more to these materials than just "Fast"! Please take note.
while I agree with you, calling HMPE material "fastflight" is like folks calling any soda water a coke.. it's just a generalization...    :thumbsup:
Mike "Javi" Cooper
TBoT Member

Offline LBR

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4221
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #29 on: June 12, 2011, 11:47:00 PM »
HMPE, Dyneema, Spectra, FF...I'm with Javi on this one.

I've had several bows break on me, known of several more.  Only two of them had a FF type string on them (it actually was original FF).  Both were old bows with skinny strings and unpadded loops.

I've said it a ton of times before--when a bow blows up and it has a FF type string on it, the knee-jerk reaction is to blame the string.  When one blows up with a dacron string on it, then something else gets blamed.

Well, let me back up a minute.  I do know of one other bow added to the list, that pretty much exploded and it had a FF type string on it.  Thing is, it blew up the first time the owner pulled it to full draw, and according to the bowyer it was a new bow.  Obviously the string had nothing to do with it.

Anyway, my point is without any other evidence, just based on my experience, dacron shortens the life of bows more than FF.  I don't think that's the case at all, just making a point.

Chad

Offline BD

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 498
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #30 on: June 13, 2011, 12:46:00 AM »
Right on Chad-I dry fired a bow with dacron once and cracked a limb. Have done it twice unfortunately with FF and not a problem!
BD

Offline P.J. Petiniot

  • SRBZ
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #31 on: June 13, 2011, 01:01:00 AM »
I would never shoot a dacron string on a longbow ever again--a Fast flite style string improves the performance and feel of a longbow to the point where you will wonder what you were thinking by not changing years ago--

On recurves, well designed recurves, I have never noticed the night and day difference that I always notice with a longbow--

When I change from dacron to FF on a recurve, it usually means changing the arrow to one that would work on a bow of 10#s heavier in weight--
If your bow has a trigger, it’s not a bow. If your bow has a trigger and a stock, it’s an abomination.

Offline JParanee

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 592
Re: Fastflight pros vs cons
« Reply #32 on: June 13, 2011, 03:06:00 PM »
If ya can use it

I have never not been able to quiet down a ff bow
Morrison & Titan ILF & BF Extreme Limbs
Silvertip 1 Piece 57#-Silvertip 57#-Black Widow Ma II 61#&69#-Fedora 560 69#- 560 57#-560 60#-560 55#-Brakenbury Shadow 60#-Hoyt Buffalo 55#- Bob Lee 58#- fishing bows PSE's

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©