Originally posted by Doc Nock:
I'd like to throw in my $.02 if I may.
Good examples and questions so far...about butchers and such.
Thing we may not be considering is that cutting yourself and STARTING to bleed or cutting up dead meat...isn't comparitive to the ultimate objective of a broad head!
What WE'RE trying to do with a broad head is KILL...by extensive and prolonged hemmorage...
We do NOT want the bleeding to stop.
Having said that, ever wonder why SURGEONS use polished edge scapels...blood clots kill patients!
Those tiny "burrs" leave a ragged edge. Ragged edges on vessels and arteries promote clotting by giving the blood plattelets a place to grab a hold and start the clot.
Deer in general have been eating green, leafy vegetables all summer...that are packed with Vitamin K...that enhances clotting!
Researches believe this is an evolutionary (God-incident?)that prepares the animals for the rigor of the rut...so they can heal quickly from injuries during that time of fighting.
We hunt then, too, eh?
Facts won't ever change opinions, but the poster asked. Clean, polished edge cuts take longer to clot up. Science. Not personal opinions.
Don't mean that to sound authoritative, but medical science is what taught me what I share (not a real doctor, just play one on the internet but was a bio major and a Spanish leutinent)
Then there is the 2 blade vs. 3 blade debate that never will end... plugged exit holes, fat plugging, arteries stick together (really?) that works with pressure bandages till you MOVE the cut part...then it starts like a "stuck pig" all over again.
Just something I researched and felt led to share.
I'll go now!
Doc, Excellent post Sir
At the risk of
and only to add my 02.... broadhead sharpness is far more critical in upping our chances of successful game
recovery than it is to the BHDs ability to kill. Our ultimate goal is not just to kill, we need to be able to recover the animals we shoot. Many animals have been killed that never made it into the back of a truck. With that in mind, here's my thoughts on the matter-
The amount of blood left on the ground is primarily influenced by 3 critical factors (although there are other less influential factors too). The big 3 are in order of importance:
1) Shot placement
2) The level of broadhead sharpness
3) The presents or absence of an exit wound
I'm a devout 2 blade shooter but even so, given the choice between shooting an animal with a wicked sharp 3 blade or a pretty sharp 2 blade head, I'll take the wicked sharp 3 blade every time because it's not the broadheads size or blade count that matters most, it's the level of sharpness and how that relates to and influences the internal physiological responses triggered in any animal by any form of cutting of tissue (lacerating wound). (Wow, that even sounds complicated to me). As Doc Nock stated, the science is there to support this argument but lets try and simplify it for a minute. I recently cut the back of my right leg on a pretty dang sharp piece of sheetmetal. Cut is an understatement, opened it up like a zippered pouch is more like it. Haven’t had a wound like that in years. Right though skin, fat, and about ¾” deep into the muscle tissue and about 3 inches long. Nasty for sure. Now here’s the cool part- It didn’t bleed at all. I mean not at all. Less than ¼ teaspoon in the 1 ½ hours it took till it was closed up. Now why is that? Because although the “blade” was plenty sharp enough to cut me it wasn’t sharp enough to trigger the massive hemorrhage that we’d expect from this type of wound. Conversely, why does a shaving nick bleed forever? Simple, because the cut of a true razor edge cuts each individual microscopic capillary and blood vessel perfectly cleanly. They may be only microscopic blood vessels but the cut ends are wide open and the blood just flows and flows. A cut from a semi-sharp blade on the other hand tears as much as it cuts. As a result those tiny blood vessels have many loose and ragged ends which are extremely helpful to the body’s natural clotting response. The duller the blade is, the rougher the cut will be and even though the rough cut causes far more cellular damage than a surgically sharp blade will, the surgically sharp blade will produce copious amounts of free flowing blood.
In fact, the greater level of cellular damage is the cause of the rapid clotting because the more cellular damage to the tissue the greater the body’s clotting response will be. In short, the duller the blade, the greater the cellular damage and therefore the greater the natural clotting response. The sharper the blade the less cellular damage and the less natural clotting response. (translation- the amount of blood on the ground is directly related to the level of BHD sharpness).
Ron