I have used them. They are good broadheads. Not sharp out of package and point needs chiseled where not as much of a needle. They sharpended nicely. However, I do think they are much better 3 blade broadheads on the market. I have shot two deer with razorcaps. One was a 70 pound doe the other was a 130 pound buck. Both were broadside 12 to 18 yards shots both hit ribs and both broadheads were damaged. Doe the tip curled, the buck one of the blades broke off. Now both deer were killed and recovered in less than 100 yards with good bloodtrails. Now many others have probably had better results. I am a woodsman shooter now, and it looks like there are even better heads than the original woodsmans out now, all being a beefed up looking woodsman design. So to answer your questions, do I like them, nope. Kill pics yes, but don't know how to post and would not add anything to post. With just two critters shot with them compared to probably 20 deer shot with woodsmans in the past few years. The narrower length the width ratio of a woodsman or similar design of broadhead will lead to increased penetration over the less narrow razorcaps. the front end of the original woodsman head is tougher and less likely to fail when the tip is chiseled than the razor caps. You can get 6 origianl woodsmans for the price of 3 razorcaps. Although I have not shot any just seen pictures the woodsman elites, the VPA terminators (i think that is correct name) would have to be at the pinnacle for three blade heads that are on the market. All of the before mentioned non technical research was conducted shooting a 54 lb 62 inch Silvertip recurve with fast flight string shooting easton axis 400's cut to 30.5 inches on slickheads ranging from 70 lbs to bucks field dressing 185 pounds. All shots were less than 20 yards if it adds anything to your inquiry.
Topic: Tell me about RAZORCAPS (Read 370 times)
