3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: 70# to 90# longbow  (Read 211 times)

Offline Converml

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 625
70# to 90# longbow
« on: April 12, 2012, 10:53:00 PM »
When going up to higher weights what D style longbows do you prefer ? Do you feel  some are  better than others for the higher weights? If so  Why and does bow length matter? Thanks Merle
Howard Hill Cheetah

Offline straitera

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3860
Re: 70# to 90# longbow
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2012, 11:05:00 PM »
My Hills & Hill style (Maulding Big Horn, Hill, Schulz, Kramer) are in your said range & all pull 31" smooth even my 66" bows. But, I prefer the longer bows (70" ntn) are smoother still. Makes a difference at heavier weights. Any stacking up here & you'll have your spinchter in a sling. None of mine stack.
Buddy Bell

Trad is 60% mental & about 40% mental.

Offline Kentucky Jeff

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 318
Re: 70# to 90# longbow
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2012, 11:16:00 PM »
Longer bows have less of a tendency to stack.  

I shoot a 70# Hill style bow 70" ntn and 31" draw.

Offline Raging Water

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 1292
Re: 70# to 90# longbow
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2012, 12:00:00 AM »
Best heavy weight D Shaped bow.......Jack B Harrison.

I will put any my 70# or 80# plus Harrison's up against any other bow for speed, flat cast, forgiveness and smooth draw.

Matt
Matt

TGMM - Family of the Bow
TG Contributor
All Around Good Guy

Statistically, 6 out of 7 Dwarves are not Happy… which Dwarf do you CHOOSE to be?

Two things that can never be taken back...Harsh Words and Time, Wasted

Offline oxnam

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 576
Re: 70# to 90# longbow
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2012, 12:03:00 AM »
A lot of people think that all bows really start to stack after 60# regardless of style ;-)

I only have one real heavy weight bow at 80#.  It is a 70" Martin D style longbow.  I don't notice it stacking, it's just heavy.  I haven't had the opportunity to shoot any other heavy weights so I don't have much to compare it to.

  • Guest
Re: 70# to 90# longbow
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2012, 01:59:00 AM »
I have had a number bows from 80 to 96 pounds at my draw, I have seen a number of bows that were as different from bow to bow with the same company as with bows from different builders. I have had bows that looked fairly similar that had noticeable personality differences as well.  I sometimes think that different layups have different efficiency levels at particular poundages. It could be how the lams are stacked sometimes just to achieve the poundage, but efficiency variables can show up in the heavy weights. I had one that was 89 pounds that shot bear 308s (2016) with 145 grains up front and nothing stiffer, while a 64 pounder would not tolerate the 308s but was perfect with 2018s with the same point weight and 2117s with slightly heavier point. The sight windows depth was as far as I could tell identical on both bows.

Offline BowHunterGA

  • Tradbowhunter
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *
  • Posts: 1106
Re: 70# to 90# longbow
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2012, 02:10:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kentucky Jeff:
Longer bows have less of a tendency to stack.  

I shoot a 70# Hill style bow 70" ntn and 31" draw.
Agreed. I love the longer bows as the weight increases. I doubt I will ever own another bow shorter than 68" and 70" will be my preference from now on.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©