3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Skinny Strings again.  (Read 378 times)

Offline Pete McMiller

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1323
Skinny Strings again.
« on: July 11, 2012, 12:04:00 PM »
It never ceases to amaze me the change in a bow's personality after I put on a skinny string.  I started with skinny strings on all my bows a couple years ago and never looked back.  More recently I have been using 8 strands of D10 with loops padded to 16 on bows up to 60 lbs.  I even went to 6 strands on a 44 lb. Whip.  I make my own strings so tinkering is easier, and cheaper.

Just this week I took delivery of a 99% new NM Shelton 52@28.  Shot the bow within 5 minutes of the postlady leaving.  I thought, Hmmmm a little hand vibration, more than on my other bows anyway.  So last night I put on a skinny D10, tied a couple nocking points on and shot it this morning.  A noticeable difference!!  Smoother at the shot for sure.

So, just for grins, I weighed the two strings.

String that came with the bow is a 12 strand D97 with puff balls - nice string - weighs 134 grains.

D10 8-strand, padded loops and 5.75" of center serving and tied on nocks - weighs 82 grains.

That 52 grains may not seem like alot but it's a 38% reduction in string mass.  I don't know what the formulas would say but intuitively it's pretty obvious that there will be less vibration with less mass.

I will say that not all bows react to skinny strings to the same degree.  My r/d bows exhibit less of a gain because they are already very smooth shooters.  It seems like the bows that skinny strings make the biggest difference on are the hill style bows.  Both of mine are much better shooters with skinny strings.
Pete
WTA
CTAS
PBS

Charter member - Ye Old F.A.R.T.S and Elkaholics Anonymous

MOLON LABE  [mo 'lon  la 've]

"That human optimism & goodness that we put our faith in, is in no more danger than the stars in the jaws of the clouds." ............Victor Hugo

Offline threeunder

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1544
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2012, 09:50:00 PM »
Just had my first experience with one.  I am super impressed.
I've shot B-50 on everything since I got my first longbow 6 years ago.
This is definitely going to be interesting!
Ken
Ken Adkins

Never question a man's choice in bows or the quality of an animal he kills.  He is the only one who has to be satisfied with either of those choices.

Offline Overspined

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3049
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2012, 11:11:00 PM »
Agreed. 6 strand 450+ or 11 strand FF. Double served and padded loops.  My Hill bows seem to have lost all vib.

They seem normal after a while.  At first it seems they would be fragile because they are so thin.

Offline Reaper TN

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 563
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2012, 12:15:00 AM »
I've thought about it, but I just can't bring myself to even try one.  I know the are supposed to be plenty strong, but 6 strands?   :scared:    12 strands of D-10 is as skinny as I have gone. Could a 6 strand string be any more quiet than my 12 strand D-10? How much performance gain?
TT Pinnacle II  45# 62"
Hoyt Excel  50# 64"

Offline cahaba

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1773
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2012, 06:52:00 AM »
I put a D10 10 strand on my Hill and it shot better. Less shock and it shoots noticeably faster.
cahaba: A Choctaw word that means
"River from above"

Offline KentuckyTJ

  • SPONSOR
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8651
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2012, 07:29:00 AM »
Absolutely...I have seen the benefits on my 5 bows.
www.zipperbows.com
The fulfillment of your hunt is determined by the amount of effort you put into it  >>>---->

Offline BowMIke

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • Posts: 839
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2012, 07:43:00 AM »
I shoot 6 strand SBD strings on all my bows 52 lbs and under and they work great. I use 8 strand 52 lbs to 57lbs. Quiet and quick!

  • Guest
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #7 on: July 12, 2012, 08:58:00 AM »
I resisted for a while but every bow I have switched to a skinny string (mostly 8-strand D-10 SBD) has improved in speed, and silence. I am now trying to make my own but they're harder to make than a 14-16 strand string, at least for me.

Offline Pete McMiller

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1323
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #8 on: July 12, 2012, 09:06:00 AM »
huntryx,  Any particular area of your skinny string build you are having problems with?  When I started making strings a few years ago I started with skinny strings.  Not that I'm and expert but might be able to help.
Pete
WTA
CTAS
PBS

Charter member - Ye Old F.A.R.T.S and Elkaholics Anonymous

MOLON LABE  [mo 'lon  la 've]

"That human optimism & goodness that we put our faith in, is in no more danger than the stars in the jaws of the clouds." ............Victor Hugo

Offline BWD

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #9 on: July 12, 2012, 09:34:00 AM »
With the weight I shoot, I could get by with six strands, but them eight stand strings suit my eye a little better.
"If I had tried a little harder and practiced a little more, by now I could have been average"...Me

Offline Grabwad

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 139
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #10 on: July 12, 2012, 09:49:00 AM »
Did changing to a skinny string affect arrow spine?  I just ordered a SBD but I hope I won't need new arrows.

Offline Pete McMiller

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1323
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #11 on: July 12, 2012, 10:24:00 AM »
In my experience, bows with skinny strings 'appear' to like a little stiffer spine.  It could just be my imagination too since the bows shoot smoother.  Unless you are on the edge of your spine to begin with I don't think you will have to change arrows.  I'd like to hear others' experiences with spine.
Pete
WTA
CTAS
PBS

Charter member - Ye Old F.A.R.T.S and Elkaholics Anonymous

MOLON LABE  [mo 'lon  la 've]

"That human optimism & goodness that we put our faith in, is in no more danger than the stars in the jaws of the clouds." ............Victor Hugo

Offline Overspined

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3049
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #12 on: July 12, 2012, 10:38:00 AM »
Just shorten those arrows a touch. Use a lighter head, or aim left...

Offline sledge

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 216
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #13 on: July 12, 2012, 01:42:00 PM »
i'm entirely ignorant on this stuff.

just received my new bamabow with d97 string, though.  bow is 75#@28".

string is .078".  the only other bow i have strung right now is a 56#@28" o'brien.  its string (old, surely dacron), measures .102".

is my bamabow string a skinny string, or is "skinny" skinnier yet?

joe

  • Guest
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #14 on: July 12, 2012, 01:54:00 PM »
The bundles are so thin that I'm having trouble on the reverse wind before I build the second loop. Also, the padding is a bit clumsy, needing a lot of wax to stay together. Using Dynaflight 97 with B-50 padding to 16 strands.I think I just need a lot of practice.

Sledge--the "skinny" refers to the # of strands in the string, not the material.

Offline Pete McMiller

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1323
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #15 on: July 12, 2012, 02:22:00 PM »
Yep, I think practice will help with the thin bundles.  With the padded loops, I use the same D10 on those as I do with the rest of the string.  I swore off anything to do with B50 after the 2nd string - that stuff just does not want to behave.  Try a loop with D10 padding and I think you'll have a little less stress in your life.

Sledge:  I just measured two 8 strand D10 strings and they are both at .062  I wouldn't know what to recommend for a 75# bow.
Pete
WTA
CTAS
PBS

Charter member - Ye Old F.A.R.T.S and Elkaholics Anonymous

MOLON LABE  [mo 'lon  la 've]

"That human optimism & goodness that we put our faith in, is in no more danger than the stars in the jaws of the clouds." ............Victor Hugo

Offline Grabwad

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 139
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #16 on: July 20, 2012, 08:30:00 PM »
Why would the string affect my nock point?  It doesn't make any sense to me but I can't find the right nock point.  I measured the nock point on my bow before changing the string and even checked my other bow (which is the same).  

I'm scratching my head because I cant get it right.  Put the bow up until tomorrow.

Offline Red Tailed Hawk

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #17 on: July 20, 2012, 09:05:00 PM »
I agree hill style bows really benefit from a skinny string. I took the shock right out of my tembo.
I'm drinking from a saucer 'cause my cup has overflowed

Offline rastaman

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 7863
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #18 on: July 20, 2012, 09:44:00 PM »
I use 6 to 8 strands on all my bows.
TGMM Family of the Bow

                                                   :archer:                                               

Randy Keene
"Life is precious and so are you."  Marley Keene

Offline sledge

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 216
Re: Skinny Strings again.
« Reply #19 on: July 20, 2012, 10:06:00 PM »
thanks, pete-

i have every reason to have confidence in nate.

i appeeciate your taking the time to measure and respond, though.

joe

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©