3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Hill 64" opinions  (Read 1107 times)

Offline rnharris

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #20 on: January 07, 2013, 01:41:00 PM »
thanks Greg it hurt but i had to pass on it!
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline Bill Turner

  • Moderator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 3009
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #21 on: January 08, 2013, 02:23:00 PM »
I own a 64" TD "RedMan" 53@28" and several other Hill bows that are 66" in length. My draw length is just short of 28". Although I do not have a problem shooting the 64" bow, I much prefer the 66" length in the 56/57@28"range. Craig will tell you to stick with the 66/68" bow at your 29" draw.With that said I went with less draw weight to accomodate for the shorter length on my 64" "Red Man" and I'm very happy with the results.

Offline Rob DiStefano

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 12251
  • Contributing Member
    • Cavalier Pickups
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #22 on: January 08, 2013, 06:52:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by rnharris:
Hi guys I have a chance to trade for a nice Wesley but its 64" and I draw 29" I know everyone  recommends a longer bow but can this length be shot @29" without stacking? Thnx
you could pull 31" with that bow, no problem there.

but @ 29" for a 64" hill, it will stack on ya like crazy and make you very very sad.

with a 29" draw length on a hill style american flat longbow, you will get some stack with a 66" length.  i wouldn't get less than a 68" amo length for a true 29" draw length.

choose wisely and as always, ymmv.
IAM ~ The only government I trust is my .45-70 ... and my 1911.

Offline rnharris

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #23 on: January 08, 2013, 07:23:00 PM »
thnx guys i truly appreciate the info and looking back over the hills iv'e owned one of the sweetest was a 70" redman stacked arrows like crazy just too long for the thickets i hunt!
TGMM Family of the Bow

  • Guest
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #24 on: January 08, 2013, 11:50:00 PM »
If you were looking for a good shooting 64"longbow for your draw, I would suggest a Mohawk or a Robertson and I would not worry much about the extra little bends, nor would I complain about the Schulz reflexed longbow speed.

Offline rnharris

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2013, 09:34:00 AM »
both are fine bows for sure and i've owned both just never had a chance to trade for a 64" Hill thnx
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline cahaba

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1773
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2013, 10:22:00 AM »
I draw 26.5" and I won't buy any Hill style bow under 66". 67" shoots best for me.
cahaba: A Choctaw word that means
"River from above"

Online Tajue17

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2850
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #27 on: January 09, 2013, 12:18:00 PM »
I'd go minimum 66" for my 27" draw,,, on a hill style bow.. reflex/deflex I'd go 64 minimum..
"Us vs Them"

Offline rnharris

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #28 on: January 10, 2013, 10:34:00 AM »
Thnx again guys
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline Sant-Ravenhill

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 441
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #29 on: January 10, 2013, 11:33:00 AM »
I'll just add to the chorus...I draw 26.5 and wouldn't go less than 66".

One fall I hunted with a 68" Hill and never found it a problem because of it's length. And I hunted some pretty thick stuff.

Offline falconview

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 121
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #30 on: January 10, 2013, 11:58:00 AM »
I have 7 hills, the shortest hill is 60" reverse handle, a 66" a couple 68" and three 70" and I draw around 29.  the 60" is an outstanding
tight cover hunting bow but in know way feels like a hill there somthing about the 70" bows that just feels right and my Kramer "big five" 5 lam, even more so,  so the length will balance speed vs  classic feel, short/ fast or long/elegant

good luck

Offline Flying Dogg

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 132
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #31 on: January 10, 2013, 02:46:00 PM »
David took the words out of my mouth.

I wouldn't do it myself. I draw 28" and like 68" bows the best--66" is marginal in a Hill style bow for me.

Offline rnharris

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #32 on: January 10, 2013, 02:52:00 PM »
:campfire:  out of the several Hills iv'e owned a 70" cheetah was my favoite thnx for all the posts!
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline normf

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 101
Re: Hill 64" opinions
« Reply #33 on: January 10, 2013, 02:57:00 PM »
I have a 66 in. Northern Mist Shelton that I put on a digital scale and it stacked under 3 lb. from 28 in. to 29 in. I draw a 29 in. and it shoots fine for me.
NFetscher

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©