3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: 52" vs 60"  (Read 322 times)

Offline H-MANEOD

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 93
52" vs 60"
« on: March 13, 2013, 07:01:00 PM »
I currently shoot a 54" recurve and I am thinking about getting a new bow.  What does anyone feel the pros/cons are for a new 52" or a 60" bow. I will be ordering it at 45#@28".
Kurt Heitman
Retired USAF EOD 1989-2009
MADDOG
FEDORA

Offline Orion

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8258
  • Contributing Member
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2013, 07:07:00 PM »
A lot depends on your draw length (and bow design, of course) .  Folks with short draw lengths can shoot either.  Folks with longer draw lengths, more than 28 inches, often find that short bows stack more and are more unstable for them.

Offline Gump21Bravo

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 128
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2013, 07:40:00 PM »
I will second what Orion said

Offline NIGEL01

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 705
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2013, 08:06:00 PM »
I have a short draw and shoot a Kmag with no problems, course I've got a 60" Browning and the draw seems smooth as butter, so I guess it depends on your draw length and what kind of hunting you do.

Offline Bruinbow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2013, 08:42:00 PM »
Short bows are beter for hunting but dont pinch yourself . With your short draw you should have no problem .

Offline H-MANEOD

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 93
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #5 on: March 13, 2013, 09:11:00 PM »
If you were just shooting for pleasure, which bow would you choose?
Kurt Heitman
Retired USAF EOD 1989-2009
MADDOG
FEDORA

Offline Brock

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1445
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #6 on: March 13, 2013, 09:33:00 PM »
as mentioned...if draw length is under 27 inches then either...if 28+ then I would worry about stacking and finger pinch.

for pleasure I would want same as for hunting without the weight...smooth, steady, natural pointing, encourages good clean release, easy to match arrows for proper flight.
Keep em sharp,

Ron Herman
Compton's Traditional Bowhunters
Backcountry Hunters & Anglers
PBS Assoc since 1988
NRA Life
USAF Retired (1984-2004)

Offline Fletcher

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 4523
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #7 on: March 13, 2013, 09:44:00 PM »
If shooting for pleasure, I would definitely go with the 60".  Shorter bows are fine, but just not as stable or comfortable.  I draw 27 with a recurve and am most comfortable with 58" for a hunter and 60 or 62 for just shooting.  Find a 45 lb Martin Hunter and you will see what I mean.
Good judgement comes from experience.  Experience comes from bad judgement.

"The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and losing."

"An archer doesn't have to be a bowhunter, but a bowhunter should be an archer."

Offline chanumpa

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 567
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #8 on: March 13, 2013, 10:35:00 PM »
Just my own preferance here but its no contest for the longer bow.

Offline Sharpend60

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 287
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #9 on: March 13, 2013, 11:00:00 PM »
I prefer longer myself, even for hunting.

Online Ray Lyon

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #10 on: March 14, 2013, 01:21:00 PM »
I think bow design plays a part in it. I have a 56" Super Shrew Classic Hunter and a 1971 60" Bear Super Kodiak.  I use them interchangably and last year at the 30 target 3D range I shot a couple of times each week. I would notice no significant difference in my scores between the two bows. The Super Shrew is handier in my Double Bull ground blind as I can shoot without conciously canting it to avoid the roof of the blind.
Tradgang Charter Member #35

Online Wheels2

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1043
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #11 on: March 14, 2013, 01:47:00 PM »
A lot depends on the riser.  Short riser with longer working limb length will feel smoother than the same length if the bow has a longer riser and shorter working limb length.
Either way you can't cheat on string pinch/angle
Super Curves.....
Covert Hunter Hex9h
Morrison Max 6 ILF
Mountain Muffler strings to keep them quiet
Shoot as much weight as you can with accuracy

Offline longrifle346

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 140
Re: 52" vs 60"
« Reply #12 on: March 14, 2013, 02:04:00 PM »
I really think it depends on the bow. I shoot a longer draw length, 29+, but I have a 1971 52" Kodiak Magnum I use for tree stands, stillhunting through thick brush, and from some ground blinds. It just barely starts to stack at anchor, nothing uncomfortable, like a "soft" wall on a compound. Normally I shoot long bows, 66", but this old KMag has become a really good friend....
If you find yourself in a fair fight? Your tactics suck!

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©