ddauler
Thanks, I have a bunch more, much better pignut hickory all dried and ready to go. I too like the cambial back of hickory, looks good and makes for a perfect unbroken surface to trust.
I did the same my original meare heaths were overbuilt and I reworked them and narrowed the tips great hunting bows.This is sort of what I was eluding to with my comment Re: "teeth jarring". In other words, if a bow shoots good with "over built" tips, it'll likely shoot even better with refined tips, unless something else becomes mucked up, i.e. tiller.
I have not made hundreds or thousands of bows like Hamm, Baker, Comstock or Gardner have, so I use their experience to evaluate different designs. These thoughts & ideas are not my own but shared knowledge. Things these authors wrote about 20 years ago are not the vogue of today's wood bow builders, some concepts have been swept under the rug.
I too have recently been working down "over-built" bows from previous ventures with good outcomes and improved qualities. As one becomes more bold, one removes un-needed wood at the expense of nothing and the gain of improved likability and performance. I don't care for clunky bows, especially selfbows.
Jim Hamm's Chapter 6 in TBB IV illustrates this wonderfully and if anyone pooh poos the prowess of a selfbow, he only needs to review the results of the MOJAM BOW TEST DATA on page 110. I always find this inspiring.
A selfbow wouldn't have to perform to any standard for me to like it or appreciate it though; it goes much deeper than that and on many levels. If I had to explain it, one likely wouldn't get it anyway. This however, doesn't refer to anyone reading this thread
Kris