Nock point and brace height are the same as before. I put on a new Martin rug rest which may be a little higher than the old one, but I would think that difference would be taken into account when I set my nock point on the new string. I did tell them to throw in a new string, since the old one had been on there a long time. This is the same company that made the bow, and the new string is no doubt whatever they're sending out with their new bows. I didn't give this much thought, and I don't remember what my old string was. If it was one I made myself, it is possible that it was better quality than the stock string. Maybe I should make another new string myself, and see if that makes any difference.
It hadn't occurred to me to re-weigh the bow. As far as I can tell, the weight hasn't changed. I keep notes on all of these things, and while the spring scale I use probably isn't all that accurate, I use the same scale for all my weight measurements, and so hopefully it at least is consistently inaccurate from one use to the next.
I could accept the fact that my chronograph could change, or my form could change over time, but the fact remains that my 50 yard gap hasn't changed with other comparable bows, while it has changed with this one. And the change seems to be related to a change in performance of the bow, as opposed to other factors that could change my 50 yard gap, since there is a correlating change in arrow velocity from the last time I measured it.
BTW, I like to use the 50 yard gap because it is pretty close to point on with all of my bows, so changes are easy to see. In the tournaments I shoot in, we have a 50 yard max distance for trad shooters, so I get a lot of practice shooting 50 yard shots. Plus, when you blow a shot at 50 yards, it's pretty obvious, so you can ignore it when you're trying to measure things.