The lead question I have is this: How could issuing more non-resident archery tags hurt you guys? Tell me!
lets see, we are in the bottom 5 (i think we are second from the bottom) states for public land, so more hunters means more competition for land.
when mr. moneybags NR hunter offers my neighbor big bucks to lease his land away from me.
these guys that lease the land, show up for a week or 2, just to shoot the "buck of a lifetime". me, on the other hand, hunt the property 2 or 3 seasons, taking numerous does, which in turn, keeps the crop damage down.
if we were to just "open the gates" and start selling deer tags over the counter at wallyworld, it would only be a few years and then we are yesterday's news..no one wanting to hunt here. or, we become pike county illinois, with dozens of outfitters driving up land prices, and driving others out of the sport.
the reason people only get to draw every 3 years or so, is because of the DNR, and the landowners deer herd management. one of the main things that sets iowa's deer herd apart, is that gun hunters aren't allowed durring the rut. gives the deer a fighting chance.
if you got to hunt here every year, all you would get to see is a 100-120 inch buck. doesn't everyone have some of those in their home state?
sure the IBA tries to keep NR tags at a reasonable level. we are protecting the rights of the IOWA BOWHUNTER. i'm sure the KBA does all they can to protect the intrests of kansas' bowhunters...kinda seems natural.
sorry to be all over the board on my reasons, but you will burn your eyesockets out on iowawhitetail.com if you run a search. or, like has been mentioned before, come on over, get your free membership, and start up a lively discussion.