INFO: Trad Archery for Bowhunters



Author Topic: Bear Kodiak  (Read 594 times)

Offline Irish

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1116
Bear Kodiak
« on: January 08, 2012, 12:39:00 PM »
I have been looking for an older Bear, and did find one.   Problem is it is 60lb at 28.   How much weight can those old bows be reduced without really effecting performance?  Bow is a 60 inch 1971 model.  Hoping to get to 53 or 54 lbs.
Mel Riley

Offline raghorn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 865
Re: Bear Kodiak
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2012, 01:28:00 PM »
Maybe 5 lbs, I have done it a couple of times and just not happy with the results. Some guys have taken off more than 5 lbs but I think you either end up with a narrow limb which loses stability or thinner glass which means that the wood core is doing more work, which can result is some limb follow. It is better to find the weight you need. My opinion.

Online cacciatore

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8316
Re: Bear Kodiak
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2012, 02:47:00 PM »
I second Raghorn,usually a 71 Bear is rarer in 60# thatit is in 50#
1993 PBS Regular
Compton
CBA
CSTAS

Offline Steve95

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 79
Re: Bear Kodiak
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2012, 02:47:00 PM »
I would not look to change a older bear bow to your desired weight but look until I found a bow that was made to your weight. Lots of bows and most guys have to drop weight with age. Young guys going elk, moose or bear hunting can still use that 60#  SK.

Offline d. ward

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 5791
Re: Bear Kodiak
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2012, 07:47:00 AM »
those bows were built using a formula of the glass and corewood thicknesses.If you change that formula to much you'll end up with a bow that does not shoot as well as it did originaly.I've done several myslef and have had a couple done by another and as mentioned above I was never as happy as I would have been with the correct draw weight bow ... just some food for thought bd

Online shick

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1337
Re: Bear Kodiak
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2012, 08:33:00 AM »
I believe the recurves don't fair out as well as the deep core longbows with weight reduction.  Just my experience.  It takes more than weight out of them.
Shick
TGMM Family of the Bow
DAV

Offline Irish

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Bear Kodiak
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2012, 09:25:00 AM »
Thanks guys!   I will keep on looking.
Mel Riley

Offline SportHunter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Bear Kodiak
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2012, 03:05:00 PM »
I would wait for a bow closer to your target weight. Plenty of Bear bows out there.

Offline Widow's Son

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 303
Re: Bear Kodiak
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2012, 03:29:00 PM »
Lots of old Bear bows out there. I had to quit looking at them. My credit card can't take anymore. LOL Good luck on your search.
1969 Bear Super Kodiak 45#
1966 Bear Kodiak 52#
2000 Black Widow MAII
46# at 28"
Roy Hall Navajo Stick, 64" Caddo 55#@28"

Offline Blackhawk

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3863
Re: Bear Kodiak
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2012, 03:30:00 PM »
I have a '68 Super kodiak at 52# that showed some hard use, so decided to have "Whip" do some refinish work.  During the process, Joe found some problems that required some weight reduction which put it at 48#.  

It now shoots better than ever and looks like new.  Joe says he can safely remove 10% from most bows, so if you find one that you just have to have, but want the weight a little less, "Whip" is your man.
Lon Scott

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©