I don't want to speak for Clay and I'm assuming he'll chime in sometime here, too. Mr. Evans, I think I agree with both of you... To obtain your JS stamp, you clearly have a high level of understanding in all the aspects necessary to make a great knife and if I'm lucky (and persistent...), I'm hopeful to get that good someday
.
I agree with you that for a knife to pass the performance test, it has superior cutting abilities and edge retention. Blade geometry and the entire heat treatment process must have been very good in order to pass. The latter must also be true in order to pass the bend test and depending upon what "in the field" means, that may be a great knife that will serve it's user very well for decades to come.
If in the field pertains, for instance, to bushcraft, the performance test knife with such a soft spine MAY not be the ideal. By that, I mean such tasks as splitting wood (using a baton to hammer the spine, forcing the blade into and splitting the wood) would potentially end up deforming the spine. M.S. Burt Foster wrote something about his experience (albeit very hard use) with a knife doing just that. He chose to utilize a process leaving him with a bit harder spine to avoid that potential problem.
Of course, this whole theory depends upon just how soft that spine is. I've watched videos where the knife came back SO FAR towards straight after being bent, it was just plain impressive. Perhaps a knife that stays far more bent is much softer and would be more prone to the problem I mentioned.
I'm certainly not all that experienced and don't mean to make any statement here as fact. I value any of your thoughts, Mr. Evans-I've got a lot to learn
.
Jeremy