Actually, I don't think the arrows are the problem. I also understand that the Hunter typically requires a very high nocking point. I will venture the hypothesis that this is just a design flaw that Martin chooses not to address. I'm not positive it's tiller, but In the case of my bow it's enough that I can't fix the porpoising with simple nocking point adjustments. I just measured the tiller at the fade-outs. The UL is 7 7/8 the LL is 7 3/4. Does that seem right?
I prefer shooting three under as it puts my eye closer to the action, but I tried one over to try and correct the tuning issue, and it got worse.
As for bare shaft tuning, I have tried it, and found there is no signifigant difference within the range of the first and biggest wobble of an out of tune arrow. It works on the same principal as paper tuning with the target acting as the paper. When I shot a compound (gasp!) I found once I got a bullet hole through paper, my broadheads (not mechanicals) went to my point of aim and grouped nearly as tightly. I try to be objective about these things. Those have been my observations, not my opinions. I hope to form an opinion someday, maybe.
Thanks, Dano and A.P. You guys are awesome, and much more genteel than the guys on some of the other forums. They can be downright nasty.
Cave-art rocks.