Author Topic: wood backings  (Read 334 times)

Offline walkabout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1057
wood backings
« on: May 20, 2010, 11:57:00 AM »
just wondering if anyone has used a wood thats easy to get straight grain, like say poplar or something similar to back a bow. i know alot of people use hickory or boo but poplar is easy to get straight grain and one could rip a ton of backings from one piece.
Richard

Offline rbbhunt

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 478
Re: wood backings
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2010, 03:57:00 PM »
I've been advised not to use poplar, too weak.
RBBHUNT
"Those who will trade liberty for
security, deserve niether" B. Franklin (a long time ago and still valid)

Offline frank bullitt

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2417
Re: wood backings
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2010, 08:10:00 PM »
I've seen and read of Maple, Elm and White Ash being used, also for backings.

Offline Cherry Tree

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 207
Re: wood backings
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2010, 08:19:00 PM »
Hickory and Maple are great!

Offline limbcracker

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: wood backings
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2010, 09:30:00 PM »
I have used 1/4"  ash successfully as backing on several cherry bows, very nice shooters too. But its too light for hickory, maple, walnut or american elm, it would probably work on hackberry or red elm as they are less dense woods like cherry. By the way ash makes a pretty good bow by its self too, or with a hickory backing. Hickory backing is not too picky about being perfectly straight, you can usually get away with a few run off grains in the working area, unless you are trying to make an elephant bow.

Offline walkabout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1057
Re: wood backings
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2010, 02:03:00 AM »
its kind of amusing that people are told poplar is too weak for a backing when tons of us use paper for backings every day.lol. this is why i was pondering it. i know a thin piece of poplar will bend pretty well. might try it out on a test piece first, ill post any results i get if anyones interested.
Richard

Offline chrisg

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 296
Re: wood backings
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2010, 04:27:00 AM »
I think its the nature of wood that has early growth and late growth, the early wood in poplar must be pretty soft indeed, whereas paper is a homogenised fibrous material with all those fibres interlocked? Also the moment of force on a thin layer of paper is minute compared to the leverage on even  1/4" backing of wood. How's that for a thumbsuck answer? :)
chrisg

Offline walkabout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1057
Re: wood backings
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2010, 07:33:00 AM »
lol. thank you for elaborating chris. makes sense though when you look at it like that.
Richard

Offline No-sage

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 483
Re: wood backings
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2010, 08:44:00 AM »
I'd also bet that 95% of paper backed bows wouldn't have broken if they weren't backed at all.

Laminated bows and backed bows are quite different from oneanother.  The backings don't do any actual work, they're just an attempt to hold down a splinter that may or may not appear. A slat of wood in a back lamination is under great tension and does a great deal of work in the finished bow.

Offline walkabout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1057
Re: wood backings
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2010, 10:39:00 AM »
i back my bows hoping that the backings would hold any splinters from lifting. from what i gather, using paper or other backing materials just makes it so theres a layer thats pristine , similar to one growth ring on a self bow. i thought the poplar or similar wood would do this as well, seeing how straight grained some of it is.
Richard

Offline Pat B

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 15009
Re: wood backings
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2010, 10:54:00 AM »
For wood backings a few things should be considered. First what is your belly wood? On bows of osage, ipe and other compression strong a tension strong wood backing(ie, hickory, boo)is acceptable but on woods that are less strong in compression ash, elm and hard maple would suffice. These woods would be good backings on osage and ipe too but I wouldn't use boo on less compression strong woods even though others have done it successfully.
  You have to consider more than looks when backing a bow. It takes more prep work and gluing skills to make a good backed bow so why use something that just "might" work. Appropriate backings for bellies and bellies for backings should be considered. IMO
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline walkabout

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1057
Re: wood backings
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2010, 11:28:00 AM »
very good points. i know poplar is weak but hadnt really thought that any backings needed to be particular since such a variety of improvised backings exist. as stated id want my backing as insurance against splinters, and i know from experience that the right backings are a must. just trying to broaden my horizon. thanks for all the input.
Richard

Offline Pat B

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 15009
Re: wood backings
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2010, 12:39:00 PM »
The only thing I'd use poplar for in archery would be arrows and handle risers.
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!
TGMM Family of the Bow

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©