Author Topic: Tri-lam taper rate vs bow length question  (Read 531 times)

Offline Zradix

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 5798
Tri-lam taper rate vs bow length question
« on: November 29, 2013, 08:04:00 PM »
Hey Gang...

In general....
Should you use a higher taper rate lam/core in a shorter bow than a longer one?
..all other things being about equal..amount of r/d etc..

Thanks     :thumbsup:
If some animals are good at hunting and others are suitable for hunting, then the Gods must clearly smile on hunting.~Aristotle

..there's more fun in hunting with the handicap of the bow than there is in hunting with the sureness of the gun.~ F.Bear

Offline LittleBen

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2970
Re: Tri-lam taper rate vs bow length question
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2013, 01:11:00 PM »
All things being equal, including stack thickness, width at fades and at tips, and same front profile, I believe the shorter bow will typically need more taper.

In practice this will almost never matter because you're never going to have two bows that fit that description ...

My advice is if you really wanna try to calculate the proper taper, use supertiller. I spent 7 years studying engineering and I wouldn't waste my time bothering any other way, Especially for a wood bow ehere you need to have nice even stress along the limb so you don't get hinges.

If you don't wanna go the supertiller route, my advice is give yourself a little extra width on the bow and a little extra thickness on the belly lam so you're got room to maneuver.

I've found that with bows ranging from 58" and 1.5" wide, to 68" and 1.75" wide (all with 1/2-3/8" tips) that a good starting point is roughly .00125" taper for every .100" of stack thickness.

So if you're bow is going to be .500" thick immediately after the fade, then you'll want .00125" X 5 = .00625" total taper, or .006" total taper. You'll probably end up tillering a little more taper in, but that'll be darn close. I'd say it varies typically between .00125" and .0015" of taper for every .100" of stack thickness.

The takedown I just posted has a 22 or 23" working limb, the stack thickness is .450" at the fade, and the stack at the tip is .310" thick.

Thats .140"/23" or so which is a total taper of about .00625", which is .00138" taper for every .100" of stack ... so right in the middle of the range I gave you.

Online Roy from Pa

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 20649
Re: Tri-lam taper rate vs bow length question
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2013, 01:50:00 PM »
A shorter bows needs a higher taper rate because there is less limb working compared to a longer bow. Now get the darn thing started there Mr. Engineer... This is a wooden bow your making, not a rocket going to the moon.    :laughing:

Offline Zradix

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 5798
Re: Tri-lam taper rate vs bow length question
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2013, 02:49:00 PM »
Hell..I KNOW I could put a rocket into space in about 3 days.
...Landing on the moon..nope...maybe crash it if I got lucky.

This bow stuff does get me over thinking things...lol

Roy that was my thinking too...but I think wrong all the time..just nice to hear I'm going down the right thought path.

Thanks for the info Ben.
That whole post is copied and pasted in my "Bible".   :thumbsup:
If some animals are good at hunting and others are suitable for hunting, then the Gods must clearly smile on hunting.~Aristotle

..there's more fun in hunting with the handicap of the bow than there is in hunting with the sureness of the gun.~ F.Bear

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©