Author Topic: Stack Question  (Read 1205 times)

Offline mwosborn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1678
Stack Question
« on: May 17, 2017, 09:58:00 PM »
Planning my swap bow and have a question...

I made a recurve form this past winter and have made 2 bows on it.  The first came in heavier than I wanted at #58.  I reduced the stack and the second came in at #49 - just as the lam stack calculator predicted.

I want to make a #40 bow on my 3rd attempt and need to reduce the stack by .03.  My question is if it makes a difference if I take this off of the parallel lam or the tapered lam?

Here are my first two stacks:

Bow 1 - .280 total
Glass - .04 x2
Parallel - .07
.003 taper - .130


Bow 2 - .265 total
Glass - .04 x2
Parallel - .06
.003 taper - .125

Thanks,

Mitch
Enjoy the hunt!  - Mitch

Offline Robertfishes

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3490
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2017, 11:09:00 PM »
you might have to take some from both parallel and taper.. Some vendors don't like to grind a 003 tapers thinner than 0.125

Online kennym

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17337
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2017, 07:49:00 AM »
If .015 took off 9#, you want to take off .030 to go 9# more?

I'm not much of a recurve guy but that sounds like a lot. But the stack calc worked the first time!

I won't go less than .010 over the lam's taper which on a .003 taper is .108 so .118 is minimum for a .003.

That should give Roy a decimal headache!
Stay sharp, Kenny.

   https://www.kennysarchery.com/

Online Roy from Pa

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 20676
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2017, 08:18:00 AM »
OMG..

Help, I just fell off my chair... LOL

Online kennym

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17337
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2017, 08:20:00 AM »
LOL
Stay sharp, Kenny.

   https://www.kennysarchery.com/

Offline Bvas

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2458
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2017, 09:23:00 AM »
You could also cut your tapers to length off of the thick end  instead of the thin end to reduce stack.
Some hunt to survive; some survive to hunt

Offline mwosborn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1678
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2017, 09:28:00 AM »
Thanks Kenny and Robert -

Kenny - I meant .03 from the original stack so the 3rd attempt would be .250 total.  How's this look?

3rd bow - .250 total
glass - .04 x2
parallel - .05
.003 taper - .120

Sorry Roy!
Enjoy the hunt!  - Mitch

Offline Robertfishes

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3490
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #7 on: May 18, 2017, 12:15:00 PM »
Yes, Bvas nailed it. that's what I do too. Some times you have to make stack height  adjustments using the tapers since 040 fiberglass is sometimes not 040..I have seen it run 038 to 043. Same with grinding parallels, A good accurate dial caliper is a must have tool for me. I used to use digital calipers but switched over to dials 2 years ago.

Offline Mad Max

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6565
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #8 on: May 18, 2017, 02:04:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Robertfishes:
Yes, Bvas nailed it. that's what I do too. Some times you have to make stack height  adjustments using the tapers since 040 fiberglass is sometimes not 040..I have seen it run 038 to 043. Same with grinding parallels, A good accurate dial caliper is a must have tool for me. I used to use digital calipers but switched over to dials 2 years ago.
X2
Be quite Kenny, your going to mess him up.   :bigsmyl:
I would rather fail at something above my means, than to succeed at something  beneath my means  
}}}}===============>>

Online Roy from Pa

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 20676
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #9 on: May 18, 2017, 02:05:00 PM »
You could also cut your tapers to length off of the thick end instead of the thin end to reduce stack.

That's how I make gwass bows too, Bvasy...

Robert, I hear ya dude. Gwass is not always what they say. That's why I quit making gwass bows...

Mitch, it's ok bro... I've been going to school for them decimal thing ah mah jigs...

Offline mwosborn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1678
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #10 on: May 18, 2017, 04:51:00 PM »
Cutting off the thick end should work just fine - thanks. I have a digital caliper that will have to do!     ;)  

Roy - can you get those bamboo backings down to .04?  Be just like glass then!     :D
Enjoy the hunt!  - Mitch

Online kennym

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17337
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #11 on: May 18, 2017, 06:17:00 PM »
:D
Stay sharp, Kenny.

   https://www.kennysarchery.com/

Offline Robertfishes

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3490
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #12 on: May 18, 2017, 06:43:00 PM »
Nothing wrong with a digital, I still use my igaging digital when I build ILF limbs and wedges..but I got a good deal on 2 used Mitutoyo dials and they seem to be more user friendly for laminations..

Online kennym

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17337
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #13 on: May 18, 2017, 07:24:00 PM »
I prefer dial calipers too. Not sure why, just do.

More traditional I suppose...   :biglaugh:
Stay sharp, Kenny.

   https://www.kennysarchery.com/

Offline mwosborn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1678
Re: Stack Question
« Reply #14 on: May 18, 2017, 09:30:00 PM »
quote:
Originally posted by kennym:
I prefer dial calipers too. Not sure why, just do.

More traditional I suppose...    :bigsmyl:

Emailed you an order Kenny.
Enjoy the hunt!  - Mitch

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©