Nope. Those ambiguous measurements at brace height are useless to me. I can dynamically balance three bows for the same person and they could each end up with different tiller measurements at brace. Maybe even one would be negative, one even, one positive. Wouldn't surprise me one tiny bit. But all would be balanced the same.
The bow's bend profile will absolutely change if the tiller stick is shifted on the bow or string. Same effect as moving your hands on bow or string. This is why it befuddles me that so many folks tiller their bows while holding and drawing on center, then move their hand an inch or two when they begin shooting. Why not just tiller it(adjust limb strengths) relative to how it will be held when shot?
I put the bow on the rope & pulley type tillering tree, hook on and draw it from where my string hand fulcrum will be, and adjust limb strength so the hook comes straight down. Done. No guessing or assuming what measurements at brace height might translate to at full draw. Balanced limbs bend in unison, arrow nock comes straight back and leaves straight away upon release. No moving nock points to 'fix' the effects of unbalanced limbs after the fact either.
Mad Max, what about a bow that unbraced, has one tip a little behind the other? This happens frequently in bows of all natural material. What are the correct tiller measurements? Tillering for dynamic balance on the tree has distinct advantages. One of them being that regardless of such disparities in limb profiles or internal anomalies, adjusting limb strength so the hook/fulcrum comes straight down balances those limbs... in spite of whatever the tiller measurements might end up as. Balanced is as balanced does.