Kirk, it sounds like you and I might be a lot alike. I hate to admit it, but years ago I used to spend hours pondering the quest for greater knowledge of what makes this or that traditional, or acceptable. I did accept that 'no wheels' defined the bow as traditional; but that definition alone was pretty narrow; focusing only on the bow...... and left the broader equipment issue too open for my acceptance.
I began to think that much of the traditional appeal for me dealt with the 'historical reenactment' of actual events which went well beyond the narrow definition of traditional archery. I didn't want to be like the guy in the local civil war reenactment that was located on the left flank, 2nd row that was carrying a scoped 30-06 while the script called for a black powder rifle:)
I guess I eventually landed on the enlightened thought that you can't live in the 60's....if only because it doesn't exist anymore. Due to that fact, at some point tradition and technology have to meet on equal terms in the broader sense of traditional archery. I now use the idea that as long as the spirit of 'style and function' of the traditional quest aren't violated, its acceptable to me. Example? Does a carbon arrow violate style and function?....no because nothing has changed in the style or function of what an arrow is supposed to do. Carbon just makes the arrow more durable.
How about a high performance bow made from the newest CNC machines and resins?...no, because the style and function of the bow in the hands of the archer remains the same.
So to answer your question about 'lighted nocks', I would apply the question "is the style or function of the lighted nock fundamentally different than a normal nock?" It really doesn't matter one way or the other how you answer the question.... because you will make your decision as to what fits you best. The 'style and function' litmus test is just how I approach such things.
Thing only truly constructive thing I can add is perhaps if you are going to watch youtube video's...watch those with Clay Hayes. That guy is awesome.....and you won't see lighted nocks:)
Great comments and some good food for thought, Mark!
I originally went from shooting...um, them other things...and came back home to the trad bows of my youth after being continually disgusted with the techno-race, where everything became obsolete and the object of scorn and derision after a few short years. After watching some original footage of Fred Bear and Howard Hill, I thought, "Eureka! That's what I'm looking for!" In the process I ditched the sights and learned to shoot instinctive (read; bare bow) and got into building my own cedars. I can appreciate the fact that I'm hunting with pretty much the same equipment that Fred used 50 years ago...and he was no slouch as a hunter! I would never begrudge anyone for using CF limbs, ILF risers, sights and all the latest truck that goes with all that, it that's their chosen 'thing'. And I'm not opposed to using carbon arrows either.
We (sadly) can't go back and live the 60's over, but to me, part of being trad is handicapping myself to some extent by limiting my effective yardage, lessening my precision by not using sights, and using handmade arrows that I built. But I'm also a realist and some of the comments made about seeing where the shot entered, where it exited (if), and finding one under the snow all have merit. While I will no doubt continue my back yard shooting with my standard cedars, I may just give lighted nocks a try-out on my hunting and stumping arrows just to see which way the wind blows. I'll be sure to update this thread if I do!
BTW, I have watched most of Clay's videos in the past. Very inspiring!