3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Skinny strings  (Read 483 times)

Offline Rob DiStefano

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 12245
  • Contributing Member
    • Cavalier Pickups
Re: Skinny strings
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2010, 05:14:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by onewhohasfun:
NDterminator, Ron has been using 6 strand 450 on his Shrews for many yrs.
as i recall, 450 is a very large diameter string fiber, twice that of df'97.  

'skinny string' means to me cutting down on the number of hmpe strands of the string fiber you commonly use, to decrease string weight and vibration, while still keeping an acceptable level of string tensile strength.  

so, if yer using 12 or 14 strands of df'97, that would safely equate to to 6 or 8 strands of the same fiber.  

all if this is based on your bow's holding weight, and the tensile strength of the type of hmpe string fiber you're using.
IAM ~ The only government I trust is my .45-70 ... and my 1911.

Offline Rob DiStefano

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 12245
  • Contributing Member
    • Cavalier Pickups
Re: Skinny strings
« Reply #21 on: January 25, 2010, 05:19:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ishoot4thrills:
 
Quote
Originally posted by Rob DiStefano:
 but i can't perceive a speed increase, and i refuse to resort to a chrono.
Rob, why the negative bias concerning chronographs? Don't you ever get curious? I have experimented with chronos for years. You can learn very much from shooting through them.

And I thought you were a "techie"!     ;)  [/b]
i've owned 3 or 4 good chronos at one point or another over the last 15 years or so.  i did a lot of bow and arrow and string testing.  while the speeds were interesting to take and review, none of that stuff had anything to do with my real world of bowhunting.

all that matters to me is the best compromise of trajectory and quietness.  whatever arrow speed it takes for an acceptable result for me, is more important than arrow speed.  

i'm techie enuf to rely on that gray computer lodged 'tween my ears and thinning hair.  :D
IAM ~ The only government I trust is my .45-70 ... and my 1911.

Offline 30coupe

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3114
Re: Skinny strings
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2010, 06:38:00 PM »
I've pretty much settled on 8 strand D97 strings on both of my Kanatis. I don't know about huge speed gains. I'm like Rob...no chrono. They were fast enough to begin with. The 8 strands do seem quieter, and I use up less material.

The Kanatis have no hand shock anyway, so that didn't change, but I made a padded loop 8 strand D97 with yarn serving for my old Mahaska longbow and got rid of the hand shock completely! If you have a bow that has hand shock, I'd give the skinny strings a try if for no other reason than that.
Kanati 58" 44# @ 28" Green glass on a green riser
Bear Kodiak Magnum 52" 45# @ 28"
Bodnik Slick Stick longbow 58" 40# @ 28"
Bodnik Kiowa 52" 45# @ 28"
Kanati 58" 46# @ 28" R.I.P (2007-2015)
Self-made Silk backed Hickory Board bow 67" 49# @ 28"
Bear Black Bear 60" 45# @28"
NRA Life Member

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©