The article by G. Fred Asbell in the latest traditional bowhunter magazine titled "Avoiding Easier" might be an interesting topic. He talks about.. how do I put it.. its kinda like death by a thousand cuts. He acknowledges how gadgets individually seem OK but when you acquire all of them or to many of them, it takes away from what it is to be traditional. Your paper could be about how the opinions of individuals in a group contrast with the ideals of the group and what is best for the group. Just about every archer has something that makes the hunt easier, but if everyone used every gadget the group would not be what its core belief says it should be. It's like a slippery slope ethical dilemma that has no solid answer that can be absolute, and as soon as you argue into one position you find that you have contradicted your beliefs, or the groups, in some way. Might be a tough paper, but an "A" if you take you time.